Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Verena Heinrich

dblp:170/9405 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
0000-0001-9775-3276ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › population genetics
pedigree reconstruction
0.312017
A likelihood ratio-based method to predict exact pedigrees for complex families from next-generation sequencing data · Bioinform. 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology
case-control study
0.212015
Strategies to improve the performance of rare variant association studies by optimizing the selection of controls · Bioinform. 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics
0.212015
Strategies to improve the performance of rare variant association studies by optimizing the selection of controls · Bioinform. 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology › population genetics
population stratification correction
0.212015
Strategies to improve the performance of rare variant association studies by optimizing the selection of controls · Bioinform. 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics › rare variant analysis
rare variant association testing
0.212015
Strategies to improve the performance of rare variant association studies by optimizing the selection of controls · Bioinform. 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

likelihood ratio test · 0.3simulation · 0.2similarity-based matching · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 A likelihood ratio-based method to predict exact pedigrees for complex families from next-generation sequencing data
abstract
MOTIVATION: Next generation sequencing technology considerably changed the way we screen for pathogenic mutations in rare Mendelian disorders. However, the identification of the disease-causing mutation amongst thousands of variants of partly unknown relevance is still challenging and efficient techniques that reduce the genomic search space play a decisive role. Often segregation- or linkage analysis are used to prioritize candidates, however, these approaches require correct information about the degree of relationship among the sequenced samples. For quality assurance an automated control of pedigree structures and sample assignment is therefore highly desirable in order to detect label mix-ups that might otherwise corrupt downstream analysis. RESULTS: We developed an algorithm based on likelihood ratios that discriminates between different classes of relationship for an arbitrary number of genotyped samples. By identifying the most likely class we are able to reconstruct entire pedigrees iteratively, even for highly consanguineous families. We tested our approach on exome data of different sequencing studies and achieved high precision for all pedigree predictions. By analyzing the precision for varying degrees of relatedness or inbreeding we could show that a prediction is robust down to magnitudes of a few hundred loci. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: A java standalone application that computes the relationships between multiple samples as well as a Rscript that visualizes the pedigree information is available for download as well as a web service at www.gene-talk.de CONTACT: [email protected] information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Verena Heinrich, Tom Kamphans, Stefan Mundlos, Peter N. Robinson, Peter M. Krawitz
Bioinform.1
2015 Strategies to improve the performance of rare variant association studies by optimizing the selection of controls
abstract
MOTIVATION: When analyzing a case group of patients with ultra-rare disorders the ethnicities are often diverse and the data quality might vary. The population substructure in the case group as well as the heterogeneous data quality can cause substantial inflation of test statistics and result in spurious associations in case-control studies if not properly adjusted for. Existing techniques to correct for confounding effects were especially developed for common variants and are not applicable to rare variants. RESULTS: We analyzed strategies to select suitable controls for cases that are based on similarity metrics that vary in their weighting schemes. We simulated different disease entities on real exome data and show that a similarity-based selection scheme can help to reduce false positive associations and to optimize the performance of the statistical tests. Especially when data quality as well as ethnicities vary a lot in the case group, a matching approach that puts more weight on rare variants shows the best performance. We reanalyzed collections of unrelated patients with Kabuki make-up syndrome, Hyperphosphatasia with Mental Retardation syndrome and Catel-Manzke syndrome for which the disease genes were recently described. We show that rare variant association tests are more sensitive and specific in identifying the disease gene than intersection filters and should thus be considered as a favorable approach in analyzing even small patient cohorts. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Datasets used in our analysis are available at ftp://ftp.1000genomes.ebi.ac.uk./vol1/ftp/ CONTACT: : [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Verena Heinrich, Thorsten Dickhaus, Jochen Hecht, Peter N. Robinson, Stefan Mundlos, Tom Kamphans, Peter M. Krawitz
Bioinform.2