Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Richard W. Thorne

dblp:171/3092 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1980
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Computer animation and physical simulation · 50% Rendering · 50%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computing education · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computing education › visual computing education
computer graphics education
0.011980
BUMPS: A program for animating projections · SIGGRAPH 1980
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1980 BUMPS: A program for animating projections
abstract
BUMPS (Brown University Multiple Projection System) is a program that illustrates the implementation of viewing transformations using animation. The program uses the viewing model defined in the Core Graphics System. BUMPS employs interactive computer graphics to demonstrate how planar geometric projections are generated, what the effects of different projections and projection parameters are on the projected object, and how the viewing functions of the Core Graphics System work. After presenting background material on projections, the features of BUMPS are described, followed by a pictorial user scenario of BUMPS in action. The paper concludes with a discussion of the merits of user controlled animation for teaching and possible improvements to the program.
Robert F. Gurwitz, Richard W. Thorne, Andries van Dam, Ingrid Carlbom
SIGGRAPH2