Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Riccardo Bortolameotti
dblp:171/4007
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 6 · 4 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Network security · 85% Usable security · 15% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Network measurement and analytics · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Network security › intrusion detection and prevention
intrusion detection |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | DEEPCASE: Semi-Supervised Contextual Analysis of Security Events · SP 2022 |
Network measurement and analytics › traffic analysis
encrypted traffic analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | FlowPrint: Semi-Supervised Mobile-App Fingerprinting on Encrypted Network Traffic · NDSS 2020 |
Network security
traffic analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | FlowPrint: Semi-Supervised Mobile-App Fingerprinting on Encrypted Network Traffic · NDSS 2020 |
Usable security
security operations |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | DEEPCASE: Semi-Supervised Contextual Analysis of Security Events · SP 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
semi-supervised learning · 1.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | DEEPCASE: Semi-Supervised Contextual Analysis of Security EventsabstractSecurity monitoring systems detect potentially malicious activities in IT infrastructures, by either looking for known signatures or for anomalous behaviors. Security operators investigate these events to determine whether they pose a threat to their organization. In many cases, a single event may be insufficient to determine whether certain activity is indeed malicious. Therefore, a security operator frequently needs to correlate multiple events to identify if they pose a real threat. Unfortunately, the vast number of events that need to be correlated often overload security operators, forcing them to ignore some events and, thereby, potentially miss attacks. This work studies how to automatically correlate security events and, thus, automate parts of the security operator workload. We design and evaluate DEEPCASE, a system that leverages the context around events to determine which events require further inspection. This approach reduces the number of events that need to be inspected. In addition, the context provides valuable insights into why certain events are classified as malicious. We show that our approach automatically filters 86.72% of the events and reduces the manual workload of security operators by 90.53%, while underestimating the risk of potential threats in less than 0.001% of cases. Thijs van Ede, Hojjat Aghakhani, Noah Spahn, Riccardo Bortolameotti, Marco Cova, Andrea Continella, Maarten van Steen, Andreas Peter 0001, Christopher Krügel, Giovanni Vigna |
SP | 4 |
| 2020 | FlowPrint: Semi-Supervised Mobile-App Fingerprinting on Encrypted Network Traffic
Thijs van Ede, Riccardo Bortolameotti, Andrea Continella, Daniel J. Dubois, Martina Lindorfer, David R. Choffnes, Maarten van Steen, Andreas Peter 0001 |
NDSS | 2 |
| 2019 | Victim-Aware Adaptive Covert Channels
Riccardo Bortolameotti, Thijs van Ede, Andrea Continella, Maarten H. Everts, Willem Jonker, Pieter H. Hartel, Andreas Peter 0001 |
SecureComm (1) | 1 |
| 2017 | DECANTeR: DEteCtion of Anomalous outbouNd HTTP TRaffic by Passive Application FingerprintingabstractWe present DECANTeR, a system to detect anomalous outbound HTTP communication, which passively extracts fingerprints for each application running on a monitored host. The goal of our system is to detect unknown malware and backdoor communication indicated by unknown fingerprints extracted from a host's network traffic. We evaluate a prototype with realistic data from an international organization and datasets composed of malicious traffic. We show that our system achieves a false positive rate of 0.9% for 441 monitored host machines, an average detection rate of 97.7%, and that it cannot be evaded by malware using simple evasion techniques such as using known browser user agent values. We compare our solution with DUMONT [24], the current state-of-the-art IDS which detects HTTP covert communication channels by focusing on benign HTTP traffic. The results show that DECANTeR outperforms DUMONT in terms of detection rate, false positive rate, and even evasion-resistance. Finally, DECANTeR detects 96.8% of information stealers in our dataset, which shows its potential to detect data exfiltration. Riccardo Bortolameotti, Thijs van Ede, Marco Caselli, Maarten H. Everts, Pieter H. Hartel, Rick Hofstede, Willem Jonker, Andreas Peter 0001 |
ACSAC | 1 |
| 2016 | Reliably determining data leakage in the presence of strong attackers
Riccardo Bortolameotti, Andreas Peter 0001, Maarten H. Everts, Willem Jonker, Pieter H. Hartel |
ACSAC | 1 |
| 2015 | Indicators of Malicious SSL Connections
Riccardo Bortolameotti, Andreas Peter 0001, Maarten H. Everts, Damiano Bolzoni |
NSS | 1 |