Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Samuel Demharter
dblp:171/4272
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0001-7352-3994ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 5 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 69% Computational science and engineering · 26% Medical and health informatics · 5% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
structural bioinformatics |
0.6 | 2 | 2018 | In silico structural modeling of multiple epigenetic marks on DNA · Bioinform. 2018 Exploring peptide/MHC detachment processes using hierarchical natural move Monte Carlo · Bioinform. 2016 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biomarker discovery
clinical biomarker discovery |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Identifying interactions in omics data for clinical biomarker discovery using symbolic regression · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › multi-omics data integration
omics data integration |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Identifying interactions in omics data for clinical biomarker discovery using symbolic regression · Bioinform. 2022 |
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning
symbolic regression |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Identifying interactions in omics data for clinical biomarker discovery using symbolic regression · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
epigenetics |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | In silico structural modeling of multiple epigenetic marks on DNA · Bioinform. 2018 |
Computational science and engineering › computational chemistry
molecular simulation |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Exploring peptide/MHC detachment processes using hierarchical natural move Monte Carlo · Bioinform. 2016 |
Medical and health informatics
precision medicine |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Identifying interactions in omics data for clinical biomarker discovery using symbolic regression · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
immunoinformatics |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Exploring peptide/MHC detachment processes using hierarchical natural move Monte Carlo · Bioinform. 2016 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › immunoinformatics
peptide-MHC binding prediction |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Exploring peptide/MHC detachment processes using hierarchical natural move Monte Carlo · Bioinform. 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
symbolic regression · 0.6feature selection · 0.6natural move monte carlo · 0.3molecular simulation · 0.3stochastic conformational optimization · 0.2hierarchical natural move monte carlo · 0.2coarse-graining · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Identifying interactions in omics data for clinical biomarker discovery using symbolic regressionabstractMOTIVATION: The identification of predictive biomarker signatures from omics and multi-omics data for clinical applications is an active area of research. Recent developments in assay technologies and machine learning (ML) methods have led to significant improvements in predictive performance. However, most high-performing ML methods suffer from complex architectures and lack interpretability. RESULTS: We present the application of a novel symbolic-regression-based algorithm, the QLattice, on a selection of clinical omics datasets. This approach generates parsimonious high-performing models that can both predict disease outcomes and reveal putative disease mechanisms, demonstrating the importance of selecting maximally relevant and minimally redundant features in omics-based machine-learning applications. The simplicity and high-predictive power of these biomarker signatures make them attractive tools for high-stakes applications in areas such as primary care, clinical decision-making and patient stratification. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The QLattice is available as part of a python package (feyn), which is available at the Python Package Index (https://pypi.org/project/feyn/) and can be installed via pip. The documentation provides guides, tutorials and the API reference (https://docs.abzu.ai/). All code and data used to generate the models and plots discussed in this work can be found in https://github.com/abzu-ai/QLattice-clinical-omics. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary material is available at Bioinformatics online. Niels Johan Christensen, Samuel Demharter, Meera Vieira Machado, Lykke Pedersen, Marco Salvatore, Valdemar Stentoft-Hansen, Miquel Triana Iglesias |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2018 | In silico structural modeling of multiple epigenetic marks on DNAabstractAbstract There are four known epigenetic cytosine modifications in mammals: methylation (5mC), hydroxymethylation (5hmC), formylation (5fC) and carboxylation (5caC). The biological effects of 5mC are well understood but the roles of the remaining modifications remain elusive. Experimental and computational studies suggest that a single epigenetic mark has little structural effect but six of them can radically change the structure of DNA to a new form, F-DNA. Investigating the collective effect of multiple epigenetic marks requires the ability to interrogate all possible combinations of epigenetic states (e.g. methylated/non-methylated) along a stretch of DNA. Experiments on such complex systems are only feasible on small, isolated examples and there currently exist no systematic computational solutions to this problem. We address this issue by extending the use of Natural Move Monte Carlo to simulate the conformations of epigenetic marks. We validate our protocol by reproducing in silico experimental observations from two recently published high-resolution crystal structures that contain epigenetic marks 5hmC and 5fC. We further demonstrate that our protocol correctly finds either the F-DNA or the B-DNA states more energetically favorable depending on the configuration of the epigenetic marks. We hope that the computational efficiency and ease of use of this novel simulation framework would form the basis for future protocols and facilitate our ability to rapidly interrogate diverse epigenetic systems. Availability and implementation The code together with examples and tutorials are available from http://www.cs.ox.ac.uk/mosaics Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Konrad Krawczyk, Samuel Demharter, Bernhard Knapp, Charlotte M. Deane, Peter Minary |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2017 | Ten simple rules for surviving an interdisciplinary PhDabstractDOAJ is a unique and extensive index of diverse open access journals from around the world, driven by a growing community, committed to ensuring quality content is freely available online for everyone. Samuel Demharter, Nicholas Pearce, Kylie Beattie, Isabel Frost, Jinwoo Leem, Alistair Martin, Robert Oppenheimer, Cristian Regep, Tammo Rukat, Alexander Skates, Nicola Trendel, David Gavaghan, Charlotte M. Deane, Bernhard Knapp |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 1 |
| 2016 | Exploring peptide/MHC detachment processes using hierarchical natural move Monte CarloabstractMOTIVATION: The binding between a peptide and a major histocompatibility complex (MHC) is one of the most important processes for the induction of an adaptive immune response. Many algorithms have been developed to predict peptide/MHC (pMHC) binding. However, no approach has yet been able to give structural insight into how peptides detach from the MHC. RESULTS: In this study, we used a combination of coarse graining, hierarchical natural move Monte Carlo and stochastic conformational optimization to explore the detachment processes of 32 different peptides from HLA-A*02:01. We performed 100 independent repeats of each stochastic simulation and found that the presence of experimentally known anchor amino acids affects the detachment trajectories of our peptides. Comparison with experimental binding affinity data indicates the reliability of our approach (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.85). We also compared to a 1000 ns molecular dynamics simulation of a non-binding peptide (AAAKTPVIV) and HLA-A*02:01. Even in this simulation, the longest published for pMHC, the peptide does not fully detach. Our approach is orders of magnitude faster and as such allows us to explore pMHC detachment processes in a way not possible with all-atom molecular dynamics simulations. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The source code is freely available for download at http://www.cs.ox.ac.uk/mosaics/. CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Bernhard Knapp, Samuel Demharter, Charlotte M. Deane, Peter Minary |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2015 | Current status and future challenges in T-cell receptor/peptide/MHC molecular dynamics simulationsabstractThe interaction between T-cell receptors (TCRs) and major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-bound epitopes is one of the most important processes in the adaptive human immune response. Several hypotheses on TCR triggering have been proposed. Many of them involve structural and dynamical adjustments in the TCR/peptide/MHC interface. Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations are a computational technique that is used to investigate structural dynamics at atomic resolution. Such simulations are used to improve understanding of signalling on a structural level. Here we review how MD simulations of the TCR/peptide/MHC complex have given insight into immune system reactions not achievable with current experimental methods. Firstly, we summarize methods of TCR/peptide/MHC complex modelling and TCR/peptide/MHC MD trajectory analysis methods. Then we classify recently published simulations into categories and give an overview of approaches and results. We show that current studies do not come to the same conclusions about TCR/peptide/MHC interactions. This discrepancy might be caused by too small sample sizes or intrinsic differences between each interaction process. As computational power increases future studies will be able to and should have larger sample sizes, longer runtimes and additional parts of the immunological synapse included. Bernhard Knapp, Samuel Demharter, Reyhaneh Esmaielbeiki, Charlotte M. Deane |
Briefings Bioinform. | 2 |