This paper presents a novel scene text detection algorithm, Canny Text Detector, which takes advantage of the similarity between image edge and text for effective text localization with improved recall rate. As closely related edge pixels construct the structural information of an object, we observe that cohesive characters compose a meaningful word/sentence sharing similar properties such as spatial location, size, color, and stroke width regardless of language. However, prevalent scene text detection approaches have not fully utilized such similarity, but mostly rely on the characters classified with high confidence, leading to low recall rate. By exploiting the similarity, our approach can quickly and robustly localize a variety of texts. Inspired by the original Canny edge detector, our algorithm makes use of double threshold and hysteresis tracking to detect texts of low confidence. Experimental results on public datasets demonstrate that our algorithm outperforms the state-of the-art scene text detection methods in terms of detection rate.

The maximally stable extremal region (MSER) method has been widely used to extract character candidates, but because of its requirement for maximum stability, high text detection performance is difficult to obtain. To overcome this problem, we propose a robust character candidate extraction method that performs ER tree construction, sub-path partitioning, sub-path pruning, and character candidate selection sequentially. Then, we use the AdaBoost trained character classifier to verify the extracted character candidates. Then, we use heuristics to refine the classified character candidates and group the refined character candidates into text regions according to their geometric adjacency and color similarity. We also apply the proposed text detection method to two different color channels Crand Cband obtain the final detection result by combining the detection results on the three different channels. The proposed text detection method on ICDAR 2013 dataset achieved 8%, 1%, and 4% improvements in recall rate, precision rate and f-score, respectively, compared to the state-of-the-art methods.