Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Milad Ghaznavi

dblp:171/5715 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0003-1341-7203ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 3 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
2 papers
Software-defined and programmable networks · 93% Network management and operations · 7%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Distributed systems · 91% Cloud and datacenter computing · 9%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software-defined and programmable networks
network function virtualization
0.722020
Fault Tolerant Service Function Chaining · SIGCOMM 2020
Distributed Service Function Chaining · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2017
Software-defined and programmable networks › network function virtualization
service function chaining
0.722020
Fault Tolerant Service Function Chaining · SIGCOMM 2020
Distributed Service Function Chaining · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2017
Distributed systems
fault tolerance
0.412020
Fault Tolerant Service Function Chaining · SIGCOMM 2020
Distributed systems › fault tolerance › failure recovery
state restoration
0.412020
Fault Tolerant Service Function Chaining · SIGCOMM 2020
Software-defined and programmable networks › network function virtualization
virtual network function placement
0.312017
Distributed Service Function Chaining · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2017
Cloud and datacenter computing
resource management
0.112017
Distributed Service Function Chaining · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

state migration · 0.9failover · 0.9mixed integer programming · 0.6local search heuristic · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Fault Tolerant Service Function Chaining
abstract
Network traffic typically traverses a sequence of middleboxes forming a service function chain, or simply a chain. Tolerating failures when they occur along chains is imperative to the availability and reliability of enterprise applications. Making a chain fault-tolerant is challenging since, in the event of failures, the state of faulty middleboxes must be correctly and quickly recovered while providing high throughput and low latency.
Milad Ghaznavi, Elaheh Jalalpour, Bernard Wong 0001, Raouf Boutaba, Ali José Mashtizadeh
SIGCOMM1
2019 TMAS: A Traffic Monitoring Analytics System Leveraging Machine Learning
Elaheh Jalalpour, Milad Ghaznavi, Raouf Boutaba, Toufik Ahmed
IM2
2017 Distributed Service Function Chaining
abstract
A service-function chain, or simply a chain, is an ordered sequence of service functions, e.g., firewalls and load balancers, composing a service. A chain deployment involvesselectingand instantiating a number of virtual network functions (VNFs), i.e., softwarized service functions,placingVNF instances, androutingtraffic through them. In the current optimization-models of a chain deployment, the instances of the same function are assumed to be identical, while typical service providers offer VNFs with heterogeneous throughput and resource configurations. The VNF instances of the same function are installed in a single physical machine, which limits a chain to the throughput of a few instances that can be installed in one physical machine. Furthermore, theselection,placement, androutingproblems are solved in isolation. We present distributed service function chaining that coordinates these operations, places VNF-instances of the same functiondistributedly, and selects appropriate instances from typical VNF offerings. Such a deployment uses network resources more efficiently and decouples a chain’s throughput from that of physical machines. We formulate this deployment as a mixed integer programming (MIP) model, prove its NP-Hardness, and develop a local search heuristic called Kariz. Extensive experiments demonstrate that Kariz achieves a competitive acceptance-ratio of 76%–100% with an extra cost of less than 24% compared with the MIP model.
Milad Ghaznavi, Nashid Shahriar, Shahin Kamali, Reaz Ahmed, Raouf Boutaba
IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun.1