Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Milad Ghaznavi
dblp:171/5715
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0003-1341-7203ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 3 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
2 papers |
Software-defined and programmable networks · 93% Network management and operations · 7% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Distributed systems · 91% Cloud and datacenter computing · 9% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software-defined and programmable networks
network function virtualization |
0.7 | 2 | 2020 | Fault Tolerant Service Function Chaining · SIGCOMM 2020 Distributed Service Function Chaining · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2017 |
Software-defined and programmable networks › network function virtualization
service function chaining |
0.7 | 2 | 2020 | Fault Tolerant Service Function Chaining · SIGCOMM 2020 Distributed Service Function Chaining · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2017 |
Distributed systems
fault tolerance |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Fault Tolerant Service Function Chaining · SIGCOMM 2020 |
Distributed systems › fault tolerance › failure recovery
state restoration |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Fault Tolerant Service Function Chaining · SIGCOMM 2020 |
Software-defined and programmable networks › network function virtualization
virtual network function placement |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Distributed Service Function Chaining · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2017 |
Cloud and datacenter computing
resource management |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Distributed Service Function Chaining · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
state migration · 0.9failover · 0.9mixed integer programming · 0.6local search heuristic · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Fault Tolerant Service Function ChainingabstractNetwork traffic typically traverses a sequence of middleboxes forming a service function chain, or simply a chain. Tolerating failures when they occur along chains is imperative to the availability and reliability of enterprise applications. Making a chain fault-tolerant is challenging since, in the event of failures, the state of faulty middleboxes must be correctly and quickly recovered while providing high throughput and low latency. Milad Ghaznavi, Elaheh Jalalpour, Bernard Wong 0001, Raouf Boutaba, Ali José Mashtizadeh |
SIGCOMM | 1 |
| 2019 | TMAS: A Traffic Monitoring Analytics System Leveraging Machine Learning
Elaheh Jalalpour, Milad Ghaznavi, Raouf Boutaba, Toufik Ahmed |
IM | 2 |
| 2017 | Distributed Service Function ChainingabstractA service-function chain, or simply a chain, is an ordered sequence of service functions, e.g., firewalls and load balancers, composing a service. A chain deployment involvesselectingand instantiating a number of virtual network functions (VNFs), i.e., softwarized service functions,placingVNF instances, androutingtraffic through them. In the current optimization-models of a chain deployment, the instances of the same function are assumed to be identical, while typical service providers offer VNFs with heterogeneous throughput and resource configurations. The VNF instances of the same function are installed in a single physical machine, which limits a chain to the throughput of a few instances that can be installed in one physical machine. Furthermore, theselection,placement, androutingproblems are solved in isolation. We present distributed service function chaining that coordinates these operations, places VNF-instances of the same functiondistributedly, and selects appropriate instances from typical VNF offerings. Such a deployment uses network resources more efficiently and decouples a chain’s throughput from that of physical machines. We formulate this deployment as a mixed integer programming (MIP) model, prove its NP-Hardness, and develop a local search heuristic called Kariz. Extensive experiments demonstrate that Kariz achieves a competitive acceptance-ratio of 76%–100% with an extra cost of less than 24% compared with the MIP model. Milad Ghaznavi, Nashid Shahriar, Shahin Kamali, Reaz Ahmed, Raouf Boutaba |
IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. | 1 |