Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mahsa Taheri

dblp:171/8627 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-7931-6889ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 67% Computational complexity · 33%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Learning theory · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization error
0.912025
How many samples are needed to train a deep neural network? · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity
0.912025
How many samples are needed to train a deep neural network? · ICLR 2025
Mathematical optimization › regularization
regularized estimation
0.712023
Balancing Statistical and Computational Precision: A General Theory and Applications to Sparse Regression · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2023
Mathematical optimization › statistical estimation › regression
sparse regression
0.712023
Balancing Statistical and Computational Precision: A General Theory and Applications to Sparse Regression · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2023
Computational complexity
statistical-computational gaps
0.712023
Balancing Statistical and Computational Precision: A General Theory and Applications to Sparse Regression · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

group-sparse regression · 1.3entropy lower bounds · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 How many samples are needed to train a deep neural network?
abstract
Even though neural networks have become standard tools in many areas, many important statistical questions remain open. This paper studies the question of how much data are needed to train a ReLU feed-forward neural network. Our theoretical and empirical results suggest that the generalization error of ReLU feed-forward neural networks scales at the rate $1/\sqrt{n}$ in the sample size $n$-rather than the "parametric rate" $1/n$, which might be suggested by traditional statistical theories. Thus, broadly speaking, our results underpin the common belief that neural networks need "many" training samples. Along the way, we also establish new technical insights, such as the first lower bounds of the entropy of ReLU feed-forward networks.
Pegah Golestaneh, Mahsa Taheri, Johannes Lederer
ICLR2
2023 Balancing Statistical and Computational Precision: A General Theory and Applications to Sparse Regression
abstract
Modern technologies are generating ever-increasing amounts of data. Making use of these data requires methods that are both statistically sound and computationally efficient. Typically, the statistical and computational aspects are treated separately. In this paper, we propose an approach to entangle these two aspects in the context of regularized estimation. Applying our approach to sparse and group-sparse regression, we show that it can improve on standard pipelines both statistically and computationally.
Mahsa Taheri, Néhémy Lim, Johannes Lederer
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1
2021 Statistical guarantees for regularized neural networks
Mahsa Taheri, Johannes Lederer
Neural Networks1
2019 A self-adaptive local metric learning method for classification
Mahsa Taheri, Zahra Moslehi, Abdolreza Mirzaei, Mehran Safayani
Pattern Recognit.1
2018 Discriminative Fuzzy C-Means as a Large Margin Unsupervised Metric Learning Algorithm
abstract
In this paper, a new unsupervised metric learning algorithm with real-world application in clustering is proposed. To have a desirable clustering, the separability among different classes of data needs to be improved. A common manner in accomplishing this objective is to utilize the advantages of metric learning in clustering and vice versa. Clustering provides an estimation of class labels and metric learning maximizes the separability among these different estimated classes of data. This procedure is performed in an iterative fashion, alternating between clustering and metric learning. Here, a new method is proposed, called discriminative fuzzy c-means (Dis-FCM), in which FCM and metric learning are integrated into one joint formulation. Unlike traditional approaches, which simply alternate between clustering and metric learning, Dis-FCM applies both simultaneously. Here, FCM provides an estimation of class labels. This can avoid the problem of fast convergence, which is common in previous algorithm. Moreover, Dis-FCM is able to handle not only numerical data, but also categorical data, which are not found in traditional methods. The experimental results indicate its superiority over other state-of-the-art algorithms in terms of extrinsic and intrinsic clustering measures.
Zahra Moslehi, Mahsa Taheri, Abdolreza Mirzaei, Mehran Safayani
IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst.2