Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dominic Horsman

dblp:172/0811 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0003-4965-0584ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 3 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Quantum computing and quantum information · 56% Information theory · 28% Coding theory · 17%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information theory
graphical models
0.412020
Quantum Codes From Classical Graphical Models · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2020
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum error correction
quantum code
0.412020
Quantum Codes From Classical Graphical Models · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2020
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum error correction
0.412020
Quantum Codes From Classical Graphical Models · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2020
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › error detection and correction
classical codes
0.112020
Quantum Codes From Classical Graphical Models · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2020
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › decoding › iterative decoding
factor graphs
0.112020
Quantum Codes From Classical Graphical Models · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

graphical models · 0.4factor graph · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Kindergarden quantum mechanics graduates ...or how I learned to stop gluing LEGO together and love the ZX-calculus
Bob Coecke, Dominic Horsman, Aleks Kissinger
Theor. Comput. Sci.2
2020 Quantum Codes From Classical Graphical Models
abstract
We introduce a new graphical framework for designing quantum error correction codes based on classical principles. A key feature of this graphical language, over previous approaches, is that it is closely related to that of factor graphs or graphical models in classical information theory and machine learning. It enables us to formulate the description of the recently-introduced `coherent parity check' quantum error correction codes entirely within the language of classical information theory. This makes our construction accessible without requiring background in quantum error correction or even quantum mechanics in general. More importantly, this allows for a collaborative interplay where one can design new quantum error correction codes derived from classical codes.
Joschka Roffe, Stefan Zohren, Dominic Horsman, Nicholas Chancellor
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory3
2019 SZX-Calculus: Scalable Graphical Quantum Reasoning
abstract
Recent developments in the ZX-Calculus have resulted in complete axiomatisations first for an approximately universal restriction of the language, and then for the whole language. The main drawbacks were that the axioms that were added to achieve completeness were numerous, tedious to manipulate and lacked a physical interpretation. We present in this paper two complete axiomatisations for the general ZX-Calculus, that we believe are optimal, in that all their equations are necessary and moreover have a nice physical interpretation.
Titouan Carette, Dominic Horsman, Simon Perdrix
MFCS2