Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Noam Segev

dblp:172/0816 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-1468-4330ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Web and social media mining · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Web and social media mining › social influence analysis
influence estimation
0.312018
Measuring Influence on Instagram: A Network-Oblivious Approach · SIGIR 2018
Web and social media mining
social network analysis
0.312018
Measuring Influence on Instagram: A Network-Oblivious Approach · SIGIR 2018
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
model-based transfer learning
0.312017
Learn on Source, Refine on Target: A Model Transfer Learning Framework with Random Forests · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

regression · 0.3random forest · 0.3ensemble learning · 0.3decision tree · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Generating Product Insights from Community Q&A
abstract
In e-commerce sites, customer questions on the product details-page express the customers' information needs about the product. The answers to these questions often provide the necessary information. In this work, we present and address the novel task of generating product insights from community questions and answers (Q&A). These insights can be presented to customers to assist them in their shopping journey. Our method first generates concise, self-contained sentences based on the information in the Q&A. Then insights are selected based on the prominence of their associated questions. Empirical evaluation attests to the effectiveness of our approach in generating well-formed, objective, and helpful insights that are often not available in the product description or in summaries of customer reviews.
Lital Kuchy, Ran Levy 0001, Avihai Mejer, Noam Segev, Shunit Agmon, Miriam Farber
CIKM4
2018 Measuring Influence on Instagram: A Network-Oblivious Approach
abstract
This paper focuses on the problem of scoring and ranking influential users of Instagram, a visual content sharing online social network (OSN). Instagram is the second largest OSN in the world with 700 million active Instagram accounts, 32% of all worldwide Internet users. Among the millions of users, photos shared by more influential users are viewed by more users than posts shared by less influential counterparts. This raises the question of how to identify those influential Instagram users. In our work, we present and discuss the lack of relevant tools and insufficient metrics for influence measurement, focusing on a network oblivious approach and show that the graph-based approach used in other OSNs is a poor fit for Instagram. In our study, we consider user statistics, some of which are more intuitive than others, and several regression models to measure users' influence.
Noam Segev, Noam Avigdor, Eytan Avigdor
SIGIR1
2017 Learn on Source, Refine on Target: A Model Transfer Learning Framework with Random Forests
abstract
We propose novel model transfer-learning methods that refine a decision forest model M learned within a "source" domain using a training set sampled from a "target" domain, assumed to be a variation of the source. We present two random forest transfer algorithms. The first algorithm searches greedily for locally optimal modifications of each tree structure by trying to locally expand or reduce the tree around individual nodes. The second algorithm does not modify structure, but only the parameter (thresholds) associated with decision nodes. We also propose to combine both methods by considering an ensemble that contains the union of the two forests. The proposed methods exhibit impressive experimental results over a range of problems.
Noam Segev, Maayan Harel, Shie Mannor, Koby Crammer, Ran El-Yaniv
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.1