Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Costin Badescu
dblp:172/0877
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 3 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Quantum computing and quantum information · 94% Computational complexity · 6% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum state tomography |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | Improved Quantum data analysis · STOC 2021 Quantum state certification · STOC 2019 |
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum state tomography
shadow tomography |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Improved Quantum data analysis · STOC 2021 |
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum state testing
quantum state certification |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Quantum state certification · STOC 2019 |
Computational complexity › learning theory
sample complexity |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Quantum state certification · STOC 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
threshold search · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Improved Quantum data analysisabstractWe provide more sample-efficient versions of some basic routines in quantum data analysis, along with simpler proofs. Particularly, we give a quantum ”Threshold Search” algorithm that requires only O((log2 m)/є2) samples of a d-dimensional state ρ. That is, given observables 0 ≤ A1, A2, …, Am ≤ 1 such that (ρ Ai) ≥ 1/2 for at least one i, the algorithm finds j with (ρ Aj) ≥ 1/2−є. As a consequence, we obtain a Shadow Tomography algorithm requiring only O((log2 m)(logd)/є4) samples, which simultaneously achieves the best known dependence on each parameter m, d, є. This yields the same sample complexity for quantum Hypothesis Selection among m states; we also give an alternative Hypothesis Selection method using O((log3 m)/є2) samples. Costin Badescu, Ryan O'Donnell |
STOC | 1 |
| 2020 | Lower Bounds for Testing Complete Positivity and Quantum Separability
Costin Badescu, Ryan O'Donnell |
LATIN | 1 |
| 2019 | Quantum state certificationabstractWe consider the problem of quantum state certification, where one is given n copies of an unknown d-dimensional quantum mixed state ρ, and one wants to test whether ρ is equal to some known mixed state σ or else is є-far from σ. The goal is to use notably fewer copies than the Ω(d2) needed for full tomography on ρ (i.e., density estimation). We give two robust state certification algorithms: one with respect to fidelity using n = O(d/є) copies, and one with respect to trace distance using n = O(d/є2) copies. The latter algorithm also applies when σ is unknown as well. These copy complexities are optimal up to constant factors. Costin Badescu, Ryan O'Donnell, John Wright 0004 |
STOC | 1 |