Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Costin Badescu

dblp:172/0877 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 3 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Quantum computing and quantum information · 94% Computational complexity · 6%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum state tomography
0.922021
Improved Quantum data analysis · STOC 2021
Quantum state certification · STOC 2019
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum state tomography
shadow tomography
0.512021
Improved Quantum data analysis · STOC 2021
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum state testing
quantum state certification
0.412019
Quantum state certification · STOC 2019
Computational complexity › learning theory
sample complexity
0.112019
Quantum state certification · STOC 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

threshold search · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Improved Quantum data analysis
abstract
We provide more sample-efficient versions of some basic routines in quantum data analysis, along with simpler proofs. Particularly, we give a quantum ”Threshold Search” algorithm that requires only O((log2 m)/є2) samples of a d-dimensional state ρ. That is, given observables 0 ≤ A1, A2, …, Am ≤ 1 such that (ρ Ai) ≥ 1/2 for at least one i, the algorithm finds j with (ρ Aj) ≥ 1/2−є. As a consequence, we obtain a Shadow Tomography algorithm requiring only O((log2 m)(logd)/є4) samples, which simultaneously achieves the best known dependence on each parameter m, d, є. This yields the same sample complexity for quantum Hypothesis Selection among m states; we also give an alternative Hypothesis Selection method using O((log3 m)/є2) samples.
Costin Badescu, Ryan O'Donnell
STOC1
2020 Lower Bounds for Testing Complete Positivity and Quantum Separability
Costin Badescu, Ryan O'Donnell
LATIN1
2019 Quantum state certification
abstract
We consider the problem of quantum state certification, where one is given n copies of an unknown d-dimensional quantum mixed state ρ, and one wants to test whether ρ is equal to some known mixed state σ or else is є-far from σ. The goal is to use notably fewer copies than the Ω(d2) needed for full tomography on ρ (i.e., density estimation). We give two robust state certification algorithms: one with respect to fidelity using n = O(d/є) copies, and one with respect to trace distance using n = O(d/є2) copies. The latter algorithm also applies when σ is unknown as well. These copy complexities are optimal up to constant factors.
Costin Badescu, Ryan O'Donnell, John Wright 0004
STOC1