Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Saeed Masoudian

dblp:172/1027 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Reinforcement learning · 80% Learning theory · 20%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Approximation and online algorithms · 33% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 33% Mathematical optimization · 33%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-armed bandit
adversarial bandit
1.832024
A Best-of-both-worlds Algorithm for Bandits with Delayed Feedback with Robustness to Excessive Delays · NeurIPS 2024
A Best-of-Both-Worlds Algorithm for Bandits with Delayed Feedback · NeurIPS 2022
Improved Analysis of the Tsallis-INF Algorithm in Stochastically Constrained Adversarial Bandits and Stochastic Bandits with Adversarial Corruptions · COLT 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-armed bandit
1.832024
A Best-of-both-worlds Algorithm for Bandits with Delayed Feedback with Robustness to Excessive Delays · NeurIPS 2024
A Best-of-Both-Worlds Algorithm for Bandits with Delayed Feedback · NeurIPS 2022
Improved Analysis of the Tsallis-INF Algorithm in Stochastically Constrained Adversarial Bandits and Stochastic Bandits with Adversarial Corruptions · COLT 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
delayed feedback
1.322024
A Best-of-both-worlds Algorithm for Bandits with Delayed Feedback with Robustness to Excessive Delays · NeurIPS 2024
A Best-of-Both-Worlds Algorithm for Bandits with Delayed Feedback · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
regret bounds
1.322024
A Best-of-both-worlds Algorithm for Bandits with Delayed Feedback with Robustness to Excessive Delays · NeurIPS 2024
A Best-of-Both-Worlds Algorithm for Bandits with Delayed Feedback · NeurIPS 2022
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
multi-armed bandit
0.712023
Delayed Bandits: When Do Intermediate Observations Help? · ICML 2023
Approximation and online algorithms
online algorithms
0.712023
Delayed Bandits: When Do Intermediate Observations Help? · ICML 2023
Mathematical optimization › online optimization
regret bounds
0.712023
Delayed Bandits: When Do Intermediate Observations Help? · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-armed bandit
stochastic and adversarial bandits
0.512021
Improved Analysis of the Tsallis-INF Algorithm in Stochastically Constrained Adversarial Bandits and Stochastic Bandits with Adversarial Corruptions · COLT 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

implicit exploration · 1.3adaptive skipping · 0.8skipping technique · 0.6regret analysis · 0.5Tsallis-INF · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 A Best-of-both-worlds Algorithm for Bandits with Delayed Feedback with Robustness to Excessive Delays
abstract
We propose a new best-of-both-worlds algorithm for bandits with variably delayed feedback. In contrast to prior work, which required prior knowledge of the maximal delay $d_{\max}$ and had a linear dependence of the regret on it, our algorithm can tolerate arbitrary excessive delays up to order $T$ (where $T$ is the time horizon). The algorithm is based on three technical innovations, which may all be of independent interest: (1) We introduce the first implicit exploration scheme that works in best-of-both-worlds setting. (2) We introduce the first control of distribution drift that does not rely on boundedness of delays. The control is based on the implicit exploration scheme and adaptive skipping of observations with excessive delays. (3) We introduce a procedure relating standard regret with drifted regret that does not rely on boundedness of delays. At the conceptual level, we demonstrate that complexity of best-of-both-worlds bandits with delayed feedback is characterized by the amount of information missing at the time of decision making (measured by the number of outstanding observations) rather than the time that the information is missing (measured by the delays).
Saeed Masoudian, Julian Zimmert, Yevgeny Seldin
NeurIPS1
2023 Delayed Bandits: When Do Intermediate Observations Help?
abstract
We study a $K$-armed bandit with delayed feedback and intermediate observations. We consider a model, where intermediate observations have a form of a finite state, which is observed immediately after taking an action, whereas the loss is observed after an adversarially chosen delay. We show that the regime of the mapping of states to losses determines the complexity of the problem, irrespective of whether the mapping of actions to states is stochastic or adversarial. If the mapping of states to losses is adversarial, then the regret rate is of order $\sqrt{(K+d)T}$ (within log factors), where $T$ is the time horizon and $d$ is a fixed delay. This matches the regret rate of a $K$-armed bandit with delayed feedback and without intermediate observations, implying that intermediate observations are not helpful. However, if the mapping of states to losses is stochastic, we show that the regret grows at a rate of $\sqrt{\big(K+\min\\{|\mathcal{S}|,d\\}\big)T}$ (within log factors), implying that if the number $|\mathcal{S}|$ of states is smaller than the delay, then intermediate observations help. We also provide refined high-probability regret upper bounds for non-uniform delays, together with experimental validation of our algorithms.
Emmanuel Esposito, Saeed Masoudian, Hao Qiu 0004, Dirk van der Hoeven, Nicolò Cesa-Bianchi, Yevgeny Seldin
ICML2
2022 A Best-of-Both-Worlds Algorithm for Bandits with Delayed Feedback
abstract
We present a modified tuning of the algorithm of Zimmert and Seldin [2020] for adversarial multiarmed bandits with delayed feedback, which in addition to the minimax optimal adversarial regret guarantee shown by Zimmert and Seldin [2020] simultaneously achieves a near-optimal regret guarantee in the stochastic setting with fixed delays. Specifically, the adversarial regret guarantee is $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{TK} + \sqrt{dT\log K})$, where $T$ is the time horizon, $K$ is the number of arms, and $d$ is the fixed delay, whereas the stochastic regret guarantee is $\mathcal{O}\left(\sum_{i \neq i^*}(\frac{1}{\Delta_i} \log(T) + \frac{d}{\Delta_{i}}) + d K^{1/3}\log K\right)$, where $\Delta_i$ are the suboptimality gaps. We also present an extension of the algorithm to the case of arbitrary delays, which is based on an oracle knowledge of the maximal delay $d_{max}$ and achieves $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{TK} + \sqrt{D\log K} + d_{max}K^{1/3} \log K)$ regret in the adversarial regime, where $D$ is the total delay, and $\mathcal{O}\left(\sum_{i \neq i^*}(\frac{1}{\Delta_i} \log(T) + \frac{\sigma_{max}}{\Delta_{i}}) + d_{max}K^{1/3}\log K\right)$ regret in the stochastic regime, where $\sigma_{max}$ is the maximal number of outstanding observations. Finally, we present a lower bound that matches regret upper bound achieved by the skipping technique of Zimmert and Seldin [2020] in the adversarial setting.
Saeed Masoudian, Julian Zimmert, Yevgeny Seldin
NeurIPS1
2021 Improved Analysis of the Tsallis-INF Algorithm in Stochastically Constrained Adversarial Bandits and Stochastic Bandits with Adversarial Corruptions
abstract
We derive improved regret bounds for the Tsallis-INF algorithm of Zimmert and Seldin (2021). We show that in adversarial regimes with a $(\Delta,C,T)$ self-bounding constraint the algorithm achieves $\mathcal{O}\left(\left(\sum_{i\neq i^*} \frac{1}{\Delta_i}\right)\log_+\left(\frac{(K-1)T}{\left(\sum_{i\neq i^*} \frac{1}{\Delta_i}\right)^2}\right)+\sqrt{C\left(\sum_{i\neq i^*}\frac{1}{\Delta_i}\right)\log_+\left(\frac{(K-1)T}{C\sum_{i\neq i^*}\frac{1}{\Delta_i}}\right)}\right)$ regret bound, where $T$ is the time horizon, $K$ is the number of arms, $\Delta_i$ are the suboptimality gaps, $i^*$ is the best arm, $C$ is the corruption magnitude, and $\log_+(x) = \max\left(1,\log x\right)$. The regime includes stochastic bandits, stochastically constrained adversarial bandits, and stochastic bandits with adversarial corruptions as special cases. Additionally, we provide a general analysis, which allows to achieve the same kind of improvement for generalizations of Tsallis-INF to other settings beyond multiarmed bandits.
Saeed Masoudian, Yevgeny Seldin
COLT1