Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tsung-Ju Lii
dblp:172/1037
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program verification · 50% Requirements engineering and software design · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Program verification
model checking |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | PAC learning-based verification and model synthesis · ICSE 2016 |
Requirements engineering and software design › model-driven engineering
model synthesis |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | PAC learning-based verification and model synthesis · ICSE 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sampling · 0.2PAC learning · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | PAC learning-based verification and model synthesisabstractWe introduce a novel technique for verification and model synthesis of sequential programs. Our technique is based on learning an approximate regular model of the set of feasible paths in a program, and testing whether this model contains an incorrect behavior. Exact learning algorithms require checking equivalence between the model and the program, which is a difficult problem, in general undecidable. Our learning procedure is therefore based on the framework of probably approximately correct (PAC) learning, which uses sampling instead, and provides correctness guarantees expressed using the terms error probability and confidence. Besides the verification result, our procedure also outputs the model with the said correctness guarantees. Obtained preliminary experiments show encouraging results, in some cases even outperforming mature software verifiers. Yu-Fang Chen 0001, Chiao Hsieh, Ondrej Lengál, Tsung-Ju Lii, Ming-Hsien Tsai 0001, Bow-Yaw Wang, Farn Wang |
ICSE | 4 |