EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Lukas Schott
dblp:172/1043
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
7 papers |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 28% Trustworthy machine learning · 18% Learning paradigms · 11% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
loss balancing |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Investigating Uncertainty Weighting for Multi-Task Learning: Insights and Analytical Alternative · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2026 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › loss function design
loss weighting |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Investigating Uncertainty Weighting for Multi-Task Learning: Insights and Analytical Alternative · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2026 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-task learning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Investigating Uncertainty Weighting for Multi-Task Learning: Insights and Analytical Alternative · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | A Simple Way to Make Neural Networks Robust Against Diverse Image Corruptions · ECCV (3) 2020 Towards the first adversarially robust neural network model on MNIST · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
ensemble learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Understanding Neural Coding on Latent Manifolds by Sharing Features and Dividing Ensembles · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › shared representation
feature sharing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Understanding Neural Coding on Latent Manifolds by Sharing Features and Dividing Ensembles · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › computational neuroscience
neural coding |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Understanding Neural Coding on Latent Manifolds by Sharing Features and Dividing Ensembles · ICLR 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
compositional generalization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Visual Representation Learning Does Not Generalize Strongly Within the Same Domain · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
visual representation learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Visual Representation Learning Does Not Generalize Strongly Within the Same Domain · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
disentangled representation learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Towards Nonlinear Disentanglement in Natural Data with Temporal Sparse Coding · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › corruption robustness
image corruption robustness |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Simple Way to Make Neural Networks Robust Against Diverse Image Corruptions · ECCV (3) 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Towards the first adversarially robust neural network model on MNIST · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › interactive segmentation
seeded segmentation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Learned Watershed: End-to-End Learning of Seeded Segmentation · ICCV 2017 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › image segmentation › region-based segmentation
watershed segmentation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Learned Watershed: End-to-End Learning of Seeded Segmentation · ICCV 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
uncertainty weighting · 1.0temperature scaling · 1.0softmax normalization · 1.0latent manifold learning · 0.7ensemble learning · 0.7sparse coding · 0.5independent component analysis · 0.5data augmentation · 0.4adversarial training · 0.4convolutional neural network · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Investigating Uncertainty Weighting for Multi-Task Learning: Insights and Analytical AlternativeabstractAbstract Multi-task learning (MTL) enables a single neural network to solve multiple tasks simultaneously, offering efficiency and improved generalization potential through shared representations. A central challenge in MTL is balancing task-specific losses during training to avoid performance degradation. While uncertainty-based loss weighting (UW) is a popular and competitive approach, we argue that it suffers from several limitations, including overfitting, rigid homoscedastic assumptions, and a lack of theoretical grounding for various loss functions. Therefore, we propose Soft Optimal Uncertainty Weighting (UW-SO), a novel loss weighting method that builds on UW by deriving analytically optimal weights and applying softmax normalization with adaptable temperature parameter, thereby alleviating several of the shortcomings of UW. Through extensive experiments across diverse datasets and architectures, we show that UW-SO achieves superior and robust performance compared to a variety of existing loss weighting methods. Additionally, we provide insights into the effects of temperature selection and propose measures to reduce computational demand. Lukas Kirchdorfer, Tobias Sesterhenn, Christian Bartelt, Heiner Stuckenschmidt, Lukas Schott, Jan Mathias Köhler |
Int. J. Comput. Vis. | 5 |
| 2023 | Understanding Neural Coding on Latent Manifolds by Sharing Features and Dividing Ensembles
Martin Bjerke, Lukas Schott, Kristopher T. Jensen, Claudia Battistin, David A. Klindt, Benjamin A. Dunn |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2022 | Visual Representation Learning Does Not Generalize Strongly Within the Same Domain
Lukas Schott, Julius von Kügelgen, Frederik Träuble, Peter V. Gehler, Chris Russell 0001, Matthias Bethge, Bernhard Schölkopf, Francesco Locatello, Wieland Brendel |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2021 | Towards Nonlinear Disentanglement in Natural Data with Temporal Sparse Coding
David A. Klindt, Lukas Schott, Yash Sharma 0001, Ivan Ustyuzhaninov, Wieland Brendel, Matthias Bethge, Dylan M. Paiton |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2020 | A Simple Way to Make Neural Networks Robust Against Diverse Image Corruptions
Evgenia Rusak, Lukas Schott, Roland S. Zimmermann, Julian Bitterwolf, Oliver Bringmann 0001, Matthias Bethge, Wieland Brendel |
ECCV (3) | 2 |
| 2019 | Towards the first adversarially robust neural network model on MNIST
Lukas Schott, Jonas Rauber, Matthias Bethge, Wieland Brendel |
ICLR (Poster) | 1 |
| 2017 | Deep learning on symbolic representations for large-scale heterogeneous time-series event predictionabstractIn this paper, we consider the problem of event prediction with multi-variate time series data consisting of heterogeneous (continuous and categorical) variables. The complex dependencies between the variables combined with asynchronicity and sparsity of the data makes the event prediction problem particularly challenging. Most state-of-art approaches address this either by designing hand-engineered features or breaking up the problem over homogeneous variates. In this work, we formulate the (rare) event prediction task as a classification problem with a novel asymmetric loss function and propose an end-to-end deep learning algorithm over symbolic representations of time-series. Symbolic representations are fed into an embedding layer and a Long Short Term Memory Neural Network (LSTM) layer which are trained to learn discriminative features. We also propose a simple sequence chopping technique to speed-up the training of LSTM for long temporal sequences. Experiments on real-world industrial datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach. Shengdong Zhang, Soheil Bahrampour, Naveen Ramakrishnan, Lukas Schott, Mohak Shah |
ICASSP | 4 |
| 2017 | Learned Watershed: End-to-End Learning of Seeded SegmentationabstractLearned boundary maps are known to outperform handcrafted ones as a basis for the watershed algorithm. We show, for the first time, how to train watershed computation jointly with boundary map prediction. The estimator for the merging priorities is cast as a neural network that is convolutional (over space) and recurrent (over iterations). The latter allows learning of complex shape priors. The method gives the best known seeded segmentation results on the CREMI segmentation challenge. Steffen Wolf 0001, Lukas Schott, Ullrich Köthe, Fred A. Hamprecht |
ICCV | 2 |