Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chunchuan Lyu
dblp:172/1054
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 4 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Information extraction and text analysis · 60% Trustworthy machine learning · 16% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 8% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › semantic parsing
abstract meaning representation parsing |
0.8 | 2 | 2021 | A Differentiable Relaxation of Graph Segmentation and Alignment for AMR Parsing · EMNLP (1) 2021 AMR Parsing as Graph Prediction with Latent Alignment · ACL (1) 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic parsing |
0.8 | 2 | 2021 | A Differentiable Relaxation of Graph Segmentation and Alignment for AMR Parsing · EMNLP (1) 2021 AMR Parsing as Graph Prediction with Latent Alignment · ACL (1) 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic role labeling |
0.8 | 2 | 2019 | Semantic Role Labeling with Iterative Structure Refinement · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019 Capturing Argument Interaction in Semantic Role Labeling with Capsule Networks · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation matching › feature alignment › embedding alignment
latent space alignment |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | AMR Parsing as Graph Prediction with Latent Alignment · ACL (1) 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | AMR Parsing as Graph Prediction with Latent Alignment · ACL (1) 2018 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial examples |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | A Unified Gradient Regularization Family for Adversarial Examples · ICDM 2015 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | A Unified Gradient Regularization Family for Adversarial Examples · ICDM 2015 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization
gradient regularization |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | A Unified Gradient Regularization Family for Adversarial Examples · ICDM 2015 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
robust learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | A Unified Gradient Regularization Family for Adversarial Examples · ICDM 2015 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | A Unified Gradient Regularization Family for Adversarial Examples · ICDM 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variational autoencoding · 0.8differentiable relaxation · 0.5capsule network · 0.4continuous relaxation · 0.3perturbation-based defense · 0.2gradient regularization · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | DeepSPIN: Deep Structured Prediction for Natural Language ProcessingabstractDeepSPIN is a research project funded by the European Research Council (ERC) whose goal is to develop new neural structured prediction methods, models, and algorithms for improving the quality, interpretability, and data-efficiency of natural language processing (NLP) systems, with special emphasis on machine translation and quality estimation. We describe in this paper the latest findings from this project. André F. T. Martins, Ben Peters, Chrysoula Zerva, Chunchuan Lyu, Gonçalo M. Correia, Marcos V. Treviso, Pedro Henrique Martins, Tsvetomila Mihaylova |
EAMT | 4 |
| 2021 | A Differentiable Relaxation of Graph Segmentation and Alignment for AMR ParsingabstractMeaning Representations (AMR) are a broad-coverage semantic formalism which represents sentence meaning as a directed acyclic graph.To train most AMR parsers, one needs to segment the graph into subgraphs and align each such subgraph to a word in a sentence; this is normally done at preprocessing, relying on hand-crafted rules.In contrast, we treat both alignment and segmentation as latent variables in our model and induce them as part of end-to-end training.As marginalizing over the structured latent variables is infeasible, we use the variational autoencoding framework.To ensure end-to-end differentiable optimization, we introduce a differentiable relaxation of the segmentation and alignment problems.We observe that inducing segmentation yields substantial gains over using a 'greedy' segmentation heuristic.The performance of our method also approaches that of a model that relies on the segmentation rules of Lyu and Titov (2018), which were hand-crafted to handle individual AMR constructions. Chunchuan Lyu, Shay B. Cohen, Ivan Titov 0001 |
EMNLP (1) | 1 |
| 2019 | Capturing Argument Interaction in Semantic Role Labeling with Capsule NetworksabstractXinchi Chen, Chunchuan Lyu, Ivan Titov. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 2019. Xinchi Chen, Chunchuan Lyu, Ivan Titov 0001 |
EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) | 2 |
| 2019 | Semantic Role Labeling with Iterative Structure RefinementabstractChunchuan Lyu, Shay B. Cohen, Ivan Titov. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 2019. Chunchuan Lyu, Shay B. Cohen, Ivan Titov 0001 |
EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) | 1 |
| 2018 | AMR Parsing as Graph Prediction with Latent Alignmentabstractmeaning representations (AMRs) are broad-coverage sentence-level semantic representations.AMRs represent sentences as rooted labeled directed acyclic graphs.AMR parsing is challenging partly due to the lack of annotated alignments between nodes in the graphs and words in the corresponding sentences.We introduce a neural parser which treats alignments as latent variables within a joint probabilistic model of concepts, relations and alignments.As exact inference requires marginalizing over alignments and is infeasible, we use the variational autoencoding framework and a continuous relaxation of the discrete alignments.We show that joint modeling is preferable to using a pipeline of align and parse.The parser achieves the best reported results on the standard benchmark (74.4% on LDC2016E25). Chunchuan Lyu, Ivan Titov 0001 |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2015 | A Unified Gradient Regularization Family for Adversarial ExamplesabstractAdversarial examples are augmented data points generated by imperceptible perturbation of input samples. They have recently drawn much attention with the machine learning and data mining community. Being difficult to distinguish from real examples, such adversarial examples could change the prediction of many of the best learning models including the state-of-the-art deep learning models. Recent attempts have been made to build robust models that take into account adversarial examples. However, these methods can either lead to performance drops or lack mathematical motivations. In this paper, we propose a unified framework to build robust machine learning models against adversarial examples. More specifically, using the unified framework, we develop a family of gradient regularization methods that effectively penalize the gradient of loss function w.r.t. inputs. Our proposed framework is appealing in that it offers a unified view to deal with adversarial examples. It incorporates another recently-proposed perturbation based approach as a special case. In addition, we present some visual effects that reveals semantic meaning in those perturbations, and thus support our regularization method and provide another explanation for generalizability of adversarial examples. By applying this technique to Maxout networks, we conduct a series of experiments and achieve encouraging results on two benchmark datasets. In particular, we attain the best accuracy on MNIST data (without data augmentation) and competitive performance on CIFAR-10 data. Chunchuan Lyu, Kaizhu Huang, Hai-Ning Liang |
ICDM | 1 |