Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sergio Gomez Colmenarejo
dblp:172/1121 · also Sergio Gómez Colmenarejo
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 28% Optimization for machine learning · 22% Generative modeling · 20% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
learned optimizer |
0.8 | 3 | 2017 | Learned Optimizers that Scale and Generalize · ICML 2017 Learning to Learn without Gradient Descent by Gradient Descent · ICML 2017 Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent · NIPS 2016 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
offline reinforcement learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | RL Unplugged: A Collection of Benchmarks for Offline Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Learning Awareness Models · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › autoregressive model
autoregressive density estimation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Parallel Multiscale Autoregressive Density Estimation · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
autoregressive model |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Parallel Multiscale Autoregressive Density Estimation · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
density estimation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Parallel Multiscale Autoregressive Density Estimation · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration
exploration-exploitation tradeoff |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Learning to Learn without Gradient Descent by Gradient Descent · ICML 2017 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
meta-training |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Learned Optimizers that Scale and Generalize · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › autoregressive model
PixelCNN |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Parallel Multiscale Autoregressive Density Estimation · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › meta-learning
gradient-based meta-learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent · NIPS 2016 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent · NIPS 2016 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
deep reinforcement learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | RL Unplugged: A Collection of Benchmarks for Offline Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › latent representation learning › state representation learning
predictive state representation |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Learning Awareness Models · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Learning to Learn without Gradient Descent by Gradient Descent · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Learned Optimizers that Scale and Generalize · ICML 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gradient descent · 0.5reinforcement learning · 0.3predictive modeling · 0.3recurrent neural network · 0.3parallel sampling · 0.3meta-learning · 0.3hierarchical recurrent neural network · 0.3gaussian process bandits · 0.3caching activations · 0.3LSTM · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | RL Unplugged: A Collection of Benchmarks for Offline Reinforcement Learning
Caglar Gulcehre, Ziyu Wang 0001, Alexander Novikov 0001, Thomas Paine, Sergio Gomez Colmenarejo, Konrad Zolna, Rishabh Agarwal, Josh Merel, Daniel J. Mankowitz, Cosmin Paduraru, Gabriel Dulac-Arnold, Mohammad Norouzi 0002, Matt Hoffman 0001, Nicolas Heess, Nando de Freitas |
NeurIPS | 5 |
| 2018 | Learning Awareness Models
Brandon Amos, Laurent Dinh, Serkan Cabi, Thomas Rothörl, Sergio Gomez Colmenarejo, Alistair Muldal, Tom Erez, Yuval Tassa, Nando de Freitas, Misha Denil |
ICLR (Poster) | 5 |
| 2017 | Learning to Learn without Gradient Descent by Gradient DescentabstractWe learn recurrent neural network optimizers trained on simple synthetic functions by gradient descent. We show that these learned optimizers exhibit a remarkable degree of transfer in that they can be used to efficiently optimize a broad range of derivative-free black-box functions, including Gaussian process bandits, simple control objectives, global optimization benchmarks and hyper-parameter tuning tasks. Up to the training horizon, the learned optimizers learn to trade-off exploration and exploitation, and compare favourably with heavily engineered Bayesian optimization packages for hyper-parameter tuning. Yutian Chen 0001, Matt Hoffman 0001, Sergio Gomez Colmenarejo, Misha Denil, Timothy P. Lillicrap, Matt M. Botvinick, Nando de Freitas |
ICML | 3 |
| 2017 | Parallel Multiscale Autoregressive Density EstimationabstractPixelCNN achieves state-of-the-art results in density estimation for natural images. Although training is fast, inference is costly, requiring one network evaluation per pixel; O(N) for N pixels. This can be sped up by caching activations, but still involves generating each pixel sequentially. In this work, we propose a parallelized PixelCNN that allows more efficient inference by modeling certain pixel groups as conditionally independent. Our new PixelCNN model achieves competitive density estimation and orders of magnitude speedup – O(log N) sampling instead of O(N) – enabling the practical generation of 512x512 images. We evaluate the model on class-conditional image generation, text-to-image synthesis, and action-conditional video generation, showing that our model achieves the best results among non-pixel-autoregressive density models that allow efficient sampling. Scott E. Reed, Aäron van den Oord, Nal Kalchbrenner, Sergio Gomez Colmenarejo, Ziyu Wang 0001, Yutian Chen 0001, Daniel Belov, Nando de Freitas |
ICML | 4 |
| 2017 | Learned Optimizers that Scale and GeneralizeabstractLearning to learn has emerged as an important direction for achieving artificial intelligence. Two of the primary barriers to its adoption are an inability to scale to larger problems and a limited ability to generalize to new tasks. We introduce a learned gradient descent optimizer that generalizes well to new tasks, and which has significantly reduced memory and computation overhead. We achieve this by introducing a novel hierarchical RNN architecture, with minimal per-parameter overhead, augmented with additional architectural features that mirror the known structure of optimization tasks. We also develop a meta-training ensemble of small, diverse, optimization tasks capturing common properties of loss landscapes. The optimizer learns to outperform RMSProp/ADAM on problems in this corpus. More importantly, it performs comparably or better when applied to small convolutional neural networks, despite seeing no neural networks in its meta-training set. Finally, it generalizes to train Inception V3 and ResNet V2 architectures on the ImageNet dataset for thousands of steps, optimization problems that are of a vastly different scale than those it was trained on. Olga Wichrowska, Niru Maheswaranathan, Matt Hoffman 0001, Sergio Gomez Colmenarejo, Misha Denil, Nando de Freitas, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein |
ICML | 4 |
| 2016 | Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descentabstractThe move from hand-designed features to learned features in machine learning has been wildly successful. In spite of this, optimization algorithms are still designed by hand. In this paper we show how the design of an optimization algorithm can be cast as a learning problem, allowing the algorithm to learn to exploit structure in the problems of interest in an automatic way. Our learned algorithms, implemented by LSTMs, outperform generic, hand-designed competitors on the tasks for which they are trained, and also generalize well to new tasks with similar structure. We demonstrate this on a number of tasks, including simple convex problems, training neural networks, and styling images with neural art. Marcin Andrychowicz, Misha Denil, Sergio Gomez Colmenarejo, Matt Hoffman 0001, David Pfau, Tom Schaul, Nando de Freitas |
NIPS | 3 |