Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alec Radford

dblp:172/1154 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
10 papers
Generative modeling · 23% Trustworthy machine learning · 14% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 13%

Topics — the 24 heaviest of 27, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
autoregressive model
1.432021
Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generation · ICML 2021
Distribution Augmentation for Generative Modeling · ICML 2020
Generative Pretraining From Pixels · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
zero-shot transfer
1.222023
Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervision · ICML 2023
Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
feature extraction
0.912025
Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoders · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.912025
Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoders · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › mechanistic interpretability
sparse autoencoder
0.912025
Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoders · ICLR 2025
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis › automatic speech recognition
robust speech recognition
0.712023
Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervision · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative adversarial network
0.622018
Improving GANs Using Optimal Transport · ICLR (Poster) 2018
Improved Techniques for Training GANs · NIPS 2016
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language pretraining
contrastive vision-language pretraining
0.512021
Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
text-to-image generation
0.512021
Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generation · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Generative modeling › autoregressive model
autoregressive image modeling
0.412020
Generative Pretraining From Pixels · ICML 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › neural language model
autoregressive language model
0.412020
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
few-shot learning
0.412020
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › pre-training
generative pretraining
0.412020
Generative Pretraining From Pixels · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning from human feedback
0.412020
Learning to summarize with human feedback · NeurIPS 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text summarization
0.412020
Learning to summarize with human feedback · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer
0.412020
Generative Pretraining From Pixels · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › sequence modeling
transformer-based sequence modeling
0.412020
Generative Pretraining From Pixels · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
optimal transport
0.312018
Improving GANs Using Optimal Transport · ICLR (Poster) 2018
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training objective
0.312018
Improving GANs Using Optimal Transport · ICLR (Poster) 2018
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning
0.212016
Improved Techniques for Training GANs · NIPS 2016
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
weakly supervised learning
0.212023
Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervision · ICML 2023
Computer vision › Vision and language › cross-modal supervision
natural language supervision
0.112021
Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
data augmentation
0.112020
Distribution Augmentation for Generative Modeling · ICML 2020
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification
0.112016
Improved Techniques for Training GANs · NIPS 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

scaling laws · 0.9k-sparse autoencoders · 0.9multi-task learning · 0.7large-scale weak supervision · 0.7transformer · 0.5token stream modeling · 0.5pre-training · 0.5contrastive learning · 0.5linear probing · 0.4fine-tuning · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoders
abstract
Sparse autoencoders provide a promising unsupervised approach for extracting interpretable features from a language model by reconstructing activations from a sparse bottleneck layer. Since language models learn many concepts, autoencoders need to be very large to recover all relevant features. However, studying the properties of autoencoder scaling is difficult due to the need to balance reconstruction and sparsity objectives and the presence of dead latents. We propose using k-sparse autoencoders [Makhzani and Frey, 2013] to directly control sparsity, simplifying tuning and improving the reconstruction-sparsity frontier. Additionally, we find modifications that result in few dead latents, even at the largest scales we tried. Using these techniques, we find clean scaling laws with respect to autoencoder size and sparsity. We also introduce several new metrics for evaluating feature quality based on the recovery of hypothesized features, the explainability of activation patterns, and the sparsity of downstream effects. These metrics all generally improve with autoencoder size. To demonstrate the scalability of our approach, we train a 16 million latent autoencoder on GPT-4 activations for 40 billion tokens. We release training code and autoencoders for open-source models, as well as a visualizer.
Leo Gao, Tom Dupré la Tour, Henk Tillman, Gabriel Goh, Rajan Troll, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever, Jan Leike, Jeff Wu 0003
ICLR6
2023 Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervision
abstract
We study the capabilities of speech processing systems trained simply to predict large amounts of transcripts of audio on the internet. When scaled to 680,000 hours of multilingual and multitask supervision, the resulting models generalize well to standard benchmarks and are often competitive with prior fully supervised results without the need for any dataset specific fine-tuning. When compared to humans, the models approach their accuracy and robustness. We are releasing models and inference code to serve as a foundation for further work on robust speech processing.
Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Greg Brockman, Christine McLeavey, Ilya Sutskever
ICML1
2021 Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision
abstract
State-of-the-art computer vision systems are trained to predict a fixed set of predetermined object categories. This restricted form of supervision limits their generality and usability since additional labeled data is needed to specify any other visual concept. Learning directly from raw text about images is a promising alternative which leverages a much broader source of supervision. We demonstrate that the simple pre-training task of predicting which caption goes with which image is an efficient and scalable way to learn SOTA image representations from scratch on a dataset of 400 million (image, text) pairs collected from the internet. After pre-training, natural language is used to reference learned visual concepts (or describe new ones) enabling zero-shot transfer of the model to downstream tasks. We study the performance of this approach by benchmarking on over 30 different existing computer vision datasets, spanning tasks such as OCR, action recognition in videos, geo-localization, and many types of fine-grained object classification. The model transfers non-trivially to most tasks and is often competitive with a fully supervised baseline without the need for any dataset specific training. For instance, we match the accuracy of the original ResNet-50 on ImageNet zero-shot without needing to use any of the 1.28 million training examples it was trained on.
Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, Gretchen Krueger, Ilya Sutskever
ICML1
2021 Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generation
abstract
Text-to-image generation has traditionally focused on finding better modeling assumptions for training on a fixed dataset. These assumptions might involve complex architectures, auxiliary losses, or side information such as object part labels or segmentation masks supplied during training. We describe a simple approach for this task based on a transformer that autoregressively models the text and image tokens as a single stream of data. With sufficient data and scale, our approach is competitive with previous domain-specific models when evaluated in a zero-shot fashion.
Aditya Ramesh, Mikhail Pavlov, Gabriel Goh, Scott Gray, Chelsea Voss, Alec Radford, Mark Chen 0003, Ilya Sutskever
ICML6
2020 Generative Pretraining From Pixels
abstract
Inspired by progress in unsupervised representation learning for natural language, we examine whether similar models can learn useful representations for images. We train a sequence Transformer to auto-regressively predict pixels, without incorporating knowledge of the 2D input structure. Despite training on low-resolution ImageNet without labels, we find that a GPT-2 scale model learns strong image representations as measured by linear probing, fine-tuning, and low-data classification. On CIFAR-10, we achieve 96.3% accuracy with a linear probe, outperforming a supervised Wide ResNet, and 99.0% accuracy with full fine-tuning, matching the top supervised pre-trained models. We are also competitive with self-supervised benchmarks on ImageNet when substituting pixels for a VQVAE encoding, achieving 69.0% top-1 accuracy on a linear probe of our features.
Mark Chen 0003, Alec Radford, Rewon Child, Jeff Wu 0003, Heewoo Jun, David Luan, Ilya Sutskever
ICML2
2020 Distribution Augmentation for Generative Modeling
abstract
We present distribution augmentation (DistAug), a simple and powerful method of regularizing generative models. Our approach applies augmentation functions to data and, importantly, conditions the generative model on the specific function used. Unlike typical data augmentation, DistAug allows usage of functions which modify the target density, enabling aggressive augmentations more commonly seen in supervised and self-supervised learning. We demonstrate this is a more effective regularizer than standard methods, and use it to train a 152M parameter autoregressive model on CIFAR-10 to 2.56 bits per dim (relative to the state-of-the-art 2.80). Samples from this model attain FID 12.75 and IS 8.40, outperforming the majority of GANs. We further demonstrate the technique is broadly applicable across model architectures and problem domains.
Heewoo Jun, Rewon Child, Mark Chen 0003, John Schulman, Aditya Ramesh, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever
ICML6
2020 Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
abstract
We demonstrate that scaling up language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes even becoming competitive with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with 175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model, and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3 achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation, question-answering, and cloze tasks. We also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles, as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to training on large web corpora.
Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Gretchen Krueger, Thomas Henighan, Rewon Child, Aditya Ramesh, Daniel M. Ziegler, Jeff Wu 0003, Clemens Winter, Christopher Hesse, Mark Chen 0003, Eric Sigler, Mateusz Litwin, Scott Gray, Benjamin Chess, Jack Clark, Christopher Berner, Sam McCandlish, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever, Dario Amodei
NeurIPS29
2020 Learning to summarize with human feedback
abstract
As language models become more powerful, training and evaluation are increasingly bottlenecked by the data and metrics used for a particular task. For example, summarization models are often trained to predict human reference summaries and evaluated using ROUGE, but both of these metrics are rough proxies for what we really care about---summary quality. In this work, we show that it is possible to significantly improve summary quality by training a model to optimize for human preferences. We collect a large, high-quality dataset of human comparisons between summaries, train a model to predict the human-preferred summary, and use that model as a reward function to fine-tune a summarization policy using reinforcement learning. We apply our method to a version of the TL;DR dataset of Reddit posts and find that our models significantly outperform both human reference summaries and much larger models fine-tuned with supervised learning alone. Our models also transfer to CNN/DM news articles, producing summaries nearly as good as the human reference without any news-specific fine-tuning. We conduct extensive analyses to understand our human feedback dataset and fine-tuned models. We establish that our reward model generalizes to new datasets, and that optimizing our reward model results in better summaries than optimizing ROUGE according to humans. We hope the evidence from our paper motivates machine learning researchers to pay closer attention to how their training loss affects the model behavior they actually want.
Nisan Stiennon, Long Ouyang, Jeff Wu 0003, Daniel M. Ziegler, Ryan Lowe, Chelsea Voss, Alec Radford, Dario Amodei, Paul F. Christiano
NeurIPS7
2018 Improving GANs Using Optimal Transport
Tim Salimans, Han Zhang 0010, Alec Radford, Dimitris N. Metaxas
ICLR (Poster)3
2016 Improved Techniques for Training GANs
abstract
We present a variety of new architectural features and training procedures that we apply to the generative adversarial networks (GANs) framework. Using our new techniques, we achieve state-of-the-art results in semi-supervised classification on MNIST, CIFAR-10 and SVHN. The generated images are of high quality as confirmed by a visual Turing test: Our model generates MNIST samples that humans cannot distinguish from real data, and CIFAR-10 samples that yield a human error rate of 21.3%. We also present ImageNet samples with unprecedented resolution and show that our methods enable the model to learn recognizable features of ImageNet classes.
Tim Salimans, Ian J. Goodfellow, Wojciech Zaremba, Vicki Cheung, Alec Radford, Xi Chen 0022
NIPS5