Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nicky Advokaat

dblp:172/1175 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Graph data management · 69% Database system architecture and tuning · 24% Query processing and optimization · 7%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Graph data management
graph database
0.622017
gMark: Schema-Driven Generation of Graphs and Queries · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2017
gMark: Schema-Driven Generation of Graphs and Queries · ICDE 2017
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking
0.422017
gMark: Schema-Driven Generation of Graphs and Queries · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2017
Generating Flexible Workloads for Graph Databases · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2016
Database system architecture and tuning
query workload generation
0.312017
gMark: Schema-Driven Generation of Graphs and Queries · ICDE 2017
Performance modeling and evaluation › workload characterization
workload generation
0.312017
gMark: Schema-Driven Generation of Graphs and Queries · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2017
Query processing and optimization
selectivity estimation
0.112017
gMark: Schema-Driven Generation of Graphs and Queries · ICDE 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

schema-driven generation · 1.4selectivity estimation · 0.5regular path queries · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 gMark: Schema-Driven Generation of Graphs and Queries
abstract
Massive graph data sets are pervasive in contemporary application domains. Hence, graph database systems are becoming increasingly important. In the experimental study of these systems, it is vital that the research community has shared solutions for the generation of database instances and query workloads having predictable and controllable properties. We present the design and engineering principles of gMark, a domain- and query language-independent graph instance and query workload generator. A core contribution of gMark is its ability to target and control the diversity of properties of both the generated instances and the generated workloads coupled to these instances. Further novelties include support for regular path queries, a fundamental graph query paradigm, and schema-driven selectivity estimation of queries, a key feature in controlling workload chokepoints. We illustrate the flexibility and practical usability of gMark by showcasing the framework's capabilities in generating high quality graphs and workloads, and its ability to encode user-defined schemas across a variety of application domains.
Guillaume Bagan, Angela Bonifati, Radu Ciucanu, George Fletcher 0001, Aurélien Lemay, Nicky Advokaat
ICDE6
2017 gMark: Schema-Driven Generation of Graphs and Queries
abstract
Massive graph data sets are pervasive in contemporary application domains. Hence, graph database systems are becoming increasingly important. In the experimental study of these systems, it is vital that the research community has shared solutions for the generation of database instances and query workloads having predictable and controllable properties. In this paper, we present the design and engineering principles of$\mathsf {gMark}$, a domain- and query language-independent graph instance and query workload generator. A core contribution of$\mathsf {gMark}$is its ability to target and control the diversity of properties of both the generated instances and the generated workloads coupled to these instances. Further novelties include support for regular path queries, a fundamental graph query paradigm, and schema-driven selectivity estimation of queries, a key feature in controlling workload chokepoints. We illustrate the flexibility and practical usability of$\mathsf {gMark}$by showcasing the framework's capabilities in generating high quality graphs and workloads, and its ability to encode user-defined schemas across a variety of application domains.
Guillaume Bagan, Angela Bonifati, Radu Ciucanu, George Fletcher 0001, Aurélien Lemay, Nicky Advokaat
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.6
2016 Generating Flexible Workloads for Graph Databases
abstract
Graph data management tools are nowadays evolving at a great pace. Key drivers of progress in the design and study of data intensive systems are solutions for synthetic generation of data and workloads, for use in empirical studies. Current graph generators, however, provide limited or no support for workload generation or are limited to fixed use-cases. Towards addressing these limitations, we demonstrate gMark, the first domain- and query language-independent framework for synthetic graph and query workload generation. Its novel features are: (i) fine-grained control of graph instance and query workload generation via expressive user-defined schemas; (ii) the support of expressive graph query languages, including recursion among other features; and, (iii) selectivity estimation of the generated queries. During the demonstration, we will showcase the highly tunable generation of graphs and queries through various user-defined schemas and targeted selectivities, and the variety of supported practical graph query languages. We will also show a performance comparison of four state-of-the-art graph database engines, which helps us understand their current strengths and desirable future extensions.
Guillaume Bagan, Angela Bonifati, Radu Ciucanu, George Fletcher 0001, Aurélien Lemay, Nicky Advokaat
Proc. VLDB Endow.6