Compositional reinforcement learning is a promising approach for training policies to perform complex long-horizon tasks. Typically, a high-level task is decomposed into a sequence of subtasks and a separate policy is trained to perform each subtask. In this paper, we focus on the problem of training subtask policies in a way that they can be used to perform any task; here, a task is given by a sequence of subtasks. We aim to maximize the worst-case performance over all tasks as opposed to the average-case performance. We formulate the problem as a two agent zero-sum game in which the adversary picks the sequence of subtasks. We propose two RL algorithms to solve this game: one is an adaptation of existing multi-agent RL algorithms to our setting and the other is an asynchronous version which enables parallel training of subtask policies. We evaluate our approach on two multi-task environments with continuous states and actions and demonstrate that our algorithms outperform state-of-the-art baselines.

Recent advances in deep learning have enabled data-driven controller design for autonomous systems. However, verifying safety of such controllers, which are often hard-to-analyze neural networks, remains a challenge. Inspired by compositional strategies for program verification, we propose a framework for compositional learning and verification of neural network controllers. Our approach is to decompose the task (e.g., car navigation) into a sequence of subtasks (e.g., segments of the track), each corresponding to a different mode of the system (e.g., go straight or turn). Then, we learn a separate controller for each mode, and verify correctness by proving that (i) each controller is correct within its mode, and (ii) transitions between modes are correct. This compositional strategy not only improves scalability of both learning and verification, but also enables our approach to verify correctness for arbitrary compositions of the subtasks. To handle partial observability (e.g., LiDAR), we additionally learn and verify a mode predictor that predicts which controller to use. Finally, our framework also incorporates an algorithm that, given a set of controllers, automatically synthesizes the pre- and postconditions required by our verification procedure. We validate our approach in a case study on a simulation model of the F1/10 autonomous car, a system that poses challenges for existing verification tools due to both its reliance on LiDAR observations, as well as the need to prove safety for complex track geometries. We leverage our framework to learn and verify a controller that safely completes any track consisting of an arbitrary sequence of five kinds of track segments.

Probing accuracy of test fixtures implies test quality but discussions for quantitative analysis of probing accuracy is limited. Arthurs designed an automated optical inspection (AOI) for inspection of fixture probing and drilling holes and analyzed pin contact and drilling holes quality via x/y deviated positions. Reports were examined statistically and showed a significant contribution from variation of tooling holes. Scientific-based tolerances were reported for further fixture quality improvement.