Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Keisuke Umezawa

dblp:172/4713 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Robot manipulation · 77% Motion planning and robot control · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot manipulation
learning from demonstration
0.212015
Task Parameterization Using Continuous Constraints Extracted From Human Demonstrations · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2015
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › impedance control
hybrid impedance control
0.112015
Task Parameterization Using Continuous Constraints Extracted From Human Demonstrations · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

task segmentation · 0.2constraint extraction from demonstrations · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Task Parameterization Using Continuous Constraints Extracted From Human Demonstrations
abstract
In this paper, we propose an approach for learning task specifications automatically, by observing human demonstrations. Using this approach allows a robot to combine representations of individual actions to achieve a high-level goal. We hypothesize that task specifications consist of variables that present a pattern of change that is invariant across demonstrations. We identify these specifications at different stages of task completion. Changes in task constraints allow us to identify transitions in the task description and to segment them into subtasks. We extract the following task-space constraints: 1) the reference frame in which to express the task variables; 2) the variable of interest at each time step, position, or force at the end effector; and 3) a factor that can modulate the contribution of force and position in a hybrid impedance controller. The approach was validated on a seven-degree-of-freedom Kuka arm, performing two different tasks: grating vegetables and extracting a battery from a charging stand.
Ana Lucia Pais, Keisuke Umezawa, Yoshihiko Nakamura, Aude Billard
IEEE Trans. Robotics2