Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Claire Pennarun

dblp:172/8857 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0002-9895-3437ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 4

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Computational geometry · 62% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 25% Combinatorics and discrete mathematics · 13%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph theory › graph product
cartesian products
0.412019
Convex Polygons in Cartesian Products · SoCG 2019
Computational geometry › convex geometry
convex polygon
0.412019
Convex Polygons in Cartesian Products · SoCG 2019
Computational geometry › discrete geometry
convex position
0.412019
Convex Polygons in Cartesian Products · SoCG 2019
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics
extremal combinatorics
0.412019
Convex Polygons in Cartesian Products · SoCG 2019
Computational geometry › intersection graphs
contact graphs
0.312018
Planar Graphs as L-intersection or L-contact graphs · SODA 2018
Computational geometry › geometric modeling and processing
geometric representation
0.312018
Planar Graphs as L-intersection or L-contact graphs · SODA 2018
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph classes
0.312018
Planar Graphs as L-intersection or L-contact graphs · SODA 2018
Computational geometry
intersection graphs
0.312018
Planar Graphs as L-intersection or L-contact graphs · SODA 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

combinatorial bounds · 0.4approximation algorithm · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Convex Polygons in Cartesian Products
abstract
We study several problems concerning convex polygons whose vertices lie in a Cartesian product of two sets of n real numbers (for short, grid). First, we prove that every such grid contains a convex polygon with Omega(log n) vertices and that this bound is tight up to a constant factor. We generalize this result to d dimensions (for a fixed d in N), and obtain a tight lower bound of Omega(log^{d-1}n) for the maximum number of points in convex position in a d-dimensional grid. Second, we present polynomial-time algorithms for computing the longest convex polygonal chain in a grid that contains no two points with the same x- or y-coordinate. We show that the maximum size of such a convex polygon can be efficiently approximated up to a factor of 2. Finally, we present exponential bounds on the maximum number of convex polygons in these grids, and for some restricted variants. These bounds are tight up to polynomial factors.
Jean-Lou De Carufel, Adrian Dumitrescu, Wouter Meulemans, Tim Ophelders, Claire Pennarun, Csaba D. Tóth, Sander Verdonschot
SoCG5
2018 Planar Graphs as L-intersection or L-contact graphs
abstract
The ⌞-intersection graphs are the graphs that have a representation as intersection graphs of axis-parallel ⌞ shapes in the plane. A subfamily of these graphs are {⌞, |, –}-contact graphs which are the contact graphs of axis parallel ⌞, |, and – shapes in the plane. We prove here two results that were conjectured by Chaplick and Ueckerdt in 2013. We show that planar graphs are ⌞-intersection graphs, and that triangle-free planar graphs are {⌞, |, –}-contact graphs. These results are obtained by a new and simple decomposition technique for 4-connected triangulations. Our results also provide a much simpler proof of the known fact that planar graphs are segment intersection graphs.
Daniel Gonçalves 0001, Lucas Isenmann, Claire Pennarun
SODA3
2016 Non-aligned Drawings of Planar Graphs
Therese Biedl, Claire Pennarun
GD2
2015 Rook-Drawing for Plane Graphs
David Auber, Nicolas Bonichon, Paul Dorbec, Claire Pennarun
GD4