Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rostislav Chernomorsky

dblp:173/1992 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 67% Computational science and engineering · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics › copy number analysis
copy number variation detection
0.212016
CLAMMS: a scalable algorithm for calling common and rare copy number variants from exome sequencing data · Bioinform. 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › next-generation sequencing data analysis
exome sequencing analysis
0.212016
CLAMMS: a scalable algorithm for calling common and rare copy number variants from exome sequencing data · Bioinform. 2016
Computational science and engineering › latent variable model
mixture model
0.212016
CLAMMS: a scalable algorithm for calling common and rare copy number variants from exome sequencing data · Bioinform. 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical inference · 0.2lattice-aligned mixture model · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 CLAMMS: a scalable algorithm for calling common and rare copy number variants from exome sequencing data
abstract
MOTIVATION: Several algorithms exist for detecting copy number variants (CNVs) from human exome sequencing read depth, but previous tools have not been well suited for large population studies on the order of tens or hundreds of thousands of exomes. Their limitations include being difficult to integrate into automated variant-calling pipelines and being ill-suited for detecting common variants. To address these issues, we developed a new algorithm--Copy number estimation using Lattice-Aligned Mixture Models (CLAMMS)--which is highly scalable and suitable for detecting CNVs across the whole allele frequency spectrum. RESULTS: In this note, we summarize the methods and intended use-case of CLAMMS, compare it to previous algorithms and briefly describe results of validation experiments. We evaluate the adherence of CNV calls from CLAMMS and four other algorithms to Mendelian inheritance patterns on a pedigree; we compare calls from CLAMMS and other algorithms to calls from SNP genotyping arrays for a set of 3164 samples; and we use TaqMan quantitative polymerase chain reaction to validate CNVs predicted by CLAMMS at 39 loci (95% of rare variants validate; across 19 common variant loci, the mean precision and recall are 99% and 94%, respectively). In the Supplementary Materials (available at the CLAMMS Github repository), we present our methods and validation results in greater detail. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/rgcgithub/clamms (implemented in C). CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Jonathan S. Packer, Evan K. Maxwell, Colm O'Dushlaine, Alexander E. Lopez, Frederick E. Dewey, Rostislav Chernomorsky, Aris Baras, John D. Overton, Lukas Habegger, Jeffrey G. Reid
Bioinform.6