Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hilla Shinitzky

dblp:173/2553 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0001-9717-8881ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 64% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 36%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › diagnosis
model-based diagnosis
0.212016
Implementing Troubleshooting with Batch Repair · AAAI 2016
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
diagnosis
0.112020
Batch repair actions for automated troubleshooting · Artif. Intell. 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

model-based diagnosis · 0.4batch repair · 0.4heuristic search · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Batch repair actions for automated troubleshooting
Hilla Shinitzky, Roni Stern
Artif. Intell.1
2016 Implementing Troubleshooting with Batch Repair
abstract
Recent work has raised the challenge of efficient automated troubleshooting in domains where repairing a set of components in a single repair action is cheaper than repairing each of them separately. This corresponds to cases where there is a non-negligible overhead to initiating a repair action and to testing the system after a repair action. In this work we propose several algorithms for choosing which batch of components to repair, so as to minimize the overall repair costs. Experimentally, we show the benefit of these algorithms over repairing components one at a time.
Roni Stern, Meir Kalech, Hilla Shinitzky
AAAI3
2016 Batch Repair with Heuristic Search
abstract
Recent work has raised the challenge of efficient automated troubleshooting in domains where repairing a set of components in a single repair action is cheaper than repairing each of them separately. This corresponds to cases where there is a non-negligible overhead to initiating a repair action and to testing the system after a repair action. The problem can be formalized as a combinatorial search problem, propose a new objective function to optimize, and investigate several search frameworks to solve it. The resulting search space is not monotone, but we are able to devise an admissible heuristic for it that enables solving it optimally in some cases with A*. Empirical evaluation on standard model-based diagnosis benchmark systems compare the A*-based approach with other search algorithms
Hilla Shinitzky, Roni Stern, Meir Kalech
SOCS1
2015 Implementing Troubleshooting with Batch Repair
Roni Stern, Meir Kalech, Hilla Shinitzky
DX3