Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Alessio Spantini

dblp:173/4675 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 77% Optimization for machine learning · 14% Generative modeling · 9%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference
1.132020
Greedy inference with structure-exploiting lazy maps · NeurIPS 2020
Inference via Low-Dimensional Couplings · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2018
A Stein variational Newton method · NeurIPS 2018
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
transport map
0.822020
Greedy inference with structure-exploiting lazy maps · NeurIPS 2020
Inference via Low-Dimensional Couplings · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2018
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference
0.412020
Greedy inference with structure-exploiting lazy maps · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
high-dimensional inference
0.412020
Greedy inference with structure-exploiting lazy maps · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Generative modeling
normalizing flow
0.412020
Greedy inference with structure-exploiting lazy maps · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models
0.312018
Inference via Low-Dimensional Couplings · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2018
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › second-order optimization
newton method
0.312018
A Stein variational Newton method · NeurIPS 2018
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › dynamical system
nonlinear state-space model
0.312018
Inference via Low-Dimensional Couplings · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2018
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
second-order optimization
0.312018
A Stein variational Newton method · NeurIPS 2018
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference › particle-based variational inference
stein variational gradient descent
0.312018
A Stein variational Newton method · NeurIPS 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

kullback-leibler divergence · 0.8polynomial map · 0.4lazy map · 0.4reproducing kernel hilbert space · 0.3optimal transport · 0.3markov property · 0.3functional gradient descent · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Greedy inference with structure-exploiting lazy maps
abstract
We propose a framework for solving high-dimensional Bayesian inference problems using \emph{structure-exploiting} low-dimensional transport maps or flows. These maps are confined to a low-dimensional subspace (hence, lazy), and the subspace is identified by minimizing an upper bound on the Kullback--Leibler divergence (hence, structured). Our framework provides a principled way of identifying and exploiting low-dimensional structure in an inference problem. It focuses the expressiveness of a transport map along the directions of most significant discrepancy from the posterior, and can be used to build deep compositions of lazy maps, where low-dimensional projections of the parameters are iteratively transformed to match the posterior. We prove weak convergence of the generated sequence of distributions to the posterior, and we demonstrate the benefits of the framework on challenging inference problems in machine learning and differential equations, using inverse autoregressive flows and polynomial maps as examples of the underlying density estimators.
Michael Brennan, Daniele Bigoni, Olivier Zahm, Alessio Spantini, Youssef Marzouk 0001
NeurIPS4
2018 A Stein variational Newton method
abstract
Stein variational gradient descent (SVGD) was recently proposed as a general purpose nonparametric variational inference algorithm: it minimizes the Kullback–Leibler divergence between the target distribution and its approximation by implementing a form of functional gradient descent on a reproducing kernel Hilbert space [Liu & Wang, NIPS 2016]. In this paper, we accelerate and generalize the SVGD algorithm by including second-order information, thereby approximating a Newton-like iteration in function space. We also show how second-order information can lead to more effective choices of kernel. We observe significant computational gains over the original SVGD algorithm in multiple test cases.
Gianluca Detommaso, Tiangang Cui, Youssef Marzouk 0001, Alessio Spantini, Robert Scheichl
NeurIPS4
2018 Inference via Low-Dimensional Couplings
abstract
We investigate the low-dimensional structure of deterministic transformations between random variables, i.e., transport maps between probability measures. In the context of statistics and machine learning, these transformations can be used to couple a tractable “reference” measure (e.g., a standard Gaussian) with a target measure of interest. Direct simulation from the desired measure can then be achieved by pushing forward reference samples through the map. Yet characterizing such a map---e.g., representing and evaluating it---grows challenging in high dimensions. The central contribution of this paper is to establish a link between the Markov properties of the target measure and the existence of low-dimensional couplings, induced by transport maps that are sparse and/or decomposable. Our analysis not only facilitates the construction of transformations in high-dimensional settings, but also suggests new inference methodologies for continuous non-Gaussian graphical models. For instance, in the context of nonlinear state-space models, we describe new variational algorithms for filtering, smoothing, and sequential parameter inference. These algorithms can be understood as the natural generalization---to the non-Gaussian case---of the square-root Rauch--Tung--Striebel Gaussian smoother.
Alessio Spantini, Daniele Bigoni, Youssef Marzouk 0001
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1