Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Stefan Webb
dblp:173/4951
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 37% Trustworthy machine learning · 24% Graph learning · 22% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Computational complexity · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Distributed systems · 100% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › continuous graph neural network
graph neural diffusion |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | GRAND: Graph Neural Diffusion · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | GRAND: Graph Neural Diffusion · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural differential equations
neural ordinary differential equations |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | GRAND: Graph Neural Diffusion · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
neural network verification |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | A Statistical Approach to Assessing Neural Network Robustness · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | A Statistical Approach to Assessing Neural Network Robustness · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference
amortized inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Faithful Inversion of Generative Models for Effective Amortized Inference · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
approximate inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Faithful Inversion of Generative Models for Effective Amortized Inference · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Faithful Inversion of Generative Models for Effective Amortized Inference · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › privacy › privacy attack
model inversion |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Faithful Inversion of Generative Models for Effective Amortized Inference · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Distributed Bayesian Learning with Stochastic Natural Gradient Expectation Propagation and the Posterior Server · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed statistical learning
distributed bayesian learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Distributed Bayesian Learning with Stochastic Natural Gradient Expectation Propagation and the Posterior Server · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
expectation propagation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Distributed Bayesian Learning with Stochastic Natural Gradient Expectation Propagation and the Posterior Server · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
posterior inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Faithful Inversion of Generative Models for Effective Amortized Inference · NeurIPS 2018 |
Distributed systems › operating system support › interprocess communication
asynchronous message passing |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Distributed Bayesian Learning with Stochastic Natural Gradient Expectation Propagation and the Posterior Server · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Distributed systems
distributed machine learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Distributed Bayesian Learning with Stochastic Natural Gradient Expectation Propagation and the Posterior Server · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
statistical estimation · 0.8stochastic natural gradient · 0.6monte carlo sampling · 0.6partial differential equation discretization · 0.5diffusion process · 0.5graphical model inversion · 0.3amortized variational inference · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | GRAND: Graph Neural DiffusionabstractWe present Graph Neural Diffusion (GRAND) that approaches deep learning on graphs as a continuous diffusion process and treats Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) as discretisations of an underlying PDE. In our model, the layer structure and topology correspond to the discretisation choices of temporal and spatial operators. Our approach allows a principled development of a broad new class of GNNs that are able to address the common plights of graph learning models such as depth, oversmoothing, and bottlenecks. Key to the success of our models are stability with respect to perturbations in the data and this is addressed for both implicit and explicit discretisation schemes. We develop linear and nonlinear versions of GRAND, which achieve competitive results on many standard graph benchmarks. Benjamin Paul Chamberlain, James Rowbottom, Maria I. Gorinova 0001, Michael M. Bronstein, Stefan Webb, Emanuele Rossi 0001 |
ICML | 5 |
| 2021 | Statistically robust neural network classificationabstractDespite their numerous successes, there are many scenarios where adversarial risk metrics do not provide an appropriate measure of robustness. For example, test-time perturbations may occur in a probabilistic manner rather than being generated by an explicit adversary, while the poor train–test generalization of adversarial metrics can limit their usage to simple problems. Motivated by this, we develop a probabilistic robust risk framework, the statistically robust risk (SRR), which considers pointwise corruption distributions, as opposed to worst-case adversaries. The SRR provides a distinct and complementary measure of robust performance, compared to natural and adversarial risk. We show that the SRR admits estimation and training schemes which are as simple and efficient as for the natural risk: these simply require noising the inputs, but with a principled derivation for exactly how and why this should be done. Furthermore, we demonstrate both theoretically and experimentally that it can provide superior generalization performance compared with adversarial risks, enabling application to high-dimensional datasets. Benjie Wang 0001, Stefan Webb, Tom Rainforth |
UAI | 2 |
| 2019 | A Statistical Approach to Assessing Neural Network Robustness
Stefan Webb, Tom Rainforth, Yee Whye Teh, M. Pawan Kumar |
ICLR (Poster) | 1 |
| 2018 | Faithful Inversion of Generative Models for Effective Amortized InferenceabstractInference amortization methods share information across multiple posterior-inference problems, allowing each to be carried out more efficiently. Generally, they require the inversion of the dependency structure in the generative model, as the modeller must learn a mapping from observations to distributions approximating the posterior. Previous approaches have involved inverting the dependency structure in a heuristic way that fails to capture these dependencies correctly, thereby limiting the achievable accuracy of the resulting approximations. We introduce an algorithm for faithfully, and minimally, inverting the graphical model structure of any generative model. Such inverses have two crucial properties: (a) they do not encode any independence assertions that are absent from the model and; (b) they are local maxima for the number of true independencies encoded. We prove the correctness of our approach and empirically show that the resulting minimally faithful inverses lead to better inference amortization than existing heuristic approaches. Stefan Webb, Adam Golinski, Robert Zinkov, N. Siddharth 0001, Tom Rainforth, Yee Whye Teh, Frank D. Wood |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2017 | Distributed Bayesian Learning with Stochastic Natural Gradient Expectation Propagation and the Posterior ServerabstractThis paper makes two contributions to Bayesian machine learning algorithms. Firstly, we propose stochastic natural gradient expectation propagation (SNEP), a novel alternative to expectation propagation (EP), a popular variational inference algorithm. SNEP is a black box variational algorithm, in that it does not require any simplifying assumptions on the distribution of interest, beyond the existence of some Monte Carlo sampler for estimating the moments of the EP tilted distributions. Further, as opposed to EP which has no guarantee of convergence, SNEP can be shown to be convergent, even when using Monte Carlo moment estimates. Secondly, we propose a novel architecture for distributed Bayesian learning which we call the posterior server. The posterior server allows scalable and robust Bayesian learning in cases where a data set is stored in a distributed manner across a cluster, with each compute node containing a disjoint subset of data. An independent Monte Carlo sampler is run on each compute node, with direct access only to the local data subset, but which targets an approximation to the global posterior distribution given all data across the whole cluster. This is achieved by using a distributed asynchronous implementation of SNEP to pass messages across the cluster. We demonstrate SNEP and the posterior server on distributed Bayesian learning of logistic regression and neural networks. Leonard Hasenclever, Stefan Webb, Thibaut Liénart, Sebastian J. Vollmer, Balaji Lakshminarayanan, Charles Blundell, Yee Whye Teh |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |