Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tsung-Wei Ke
dblp:173/4984
· DBLP profile ↗
12ranked-venue papers
8as first author
6since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-1315-3834ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 6 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 8 · 6 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
8 papers |
Segmentation and scene understanding · 27% Generative modeling · 13% Motion planning and robot control · 11% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video processing · 100% |
Topics — the 23 heaviest of 27, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › image segmentation
hierarchical segmentation |
1.3 | 2 | 2024 | Learning Hierarchical Image Segmentation For Recognition and By Recognition · ICLR 2024 Unsupervised Hierarchical Semantic Segmentation with Multiview Cosegmentation and Clustering Transformers · CVPR 2022 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
1.3 | 3 | 2022 | Unsupervised Hierarchical Semantic Segmentation with Multiview Cosegmentation and Clustering Transformers · CVPR 2022 Adversarial Structure Matching for Structured Prediction Tasks · CVPR 2019 Adaptive Affinity Fields for Semantic Segmentation · ECCV (1) 2018 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
1.0 | 2 | 2024 | Diffusion-ES: Gradient-Free Planning with Diffusion for Autonomous and Instruction-Guided Driving · CVPR 2024 Test-time Adaptation of Discriminative Models via Diffusion Generative Feedback · NeurIPS 2023 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning › learning-based motion planning
diffusion-based trajectory planning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Diffusion-ES: Gradient-Free Planning with Diffusion for Autonomous and Instruction-Guided Driving · CVPR 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › evolutionary computation
genetic algorithms |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Diffusion-ES: Gradient-Free Planning with Diffusion for Autonomous and Instruction-Guided Driving · CVPR 2024 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Learning Hierarchical Image Segmentation For Recognition and By Recognition · ICLR 2024 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving
planning for self-driving vehicles |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Diffusion-ES: Gradient-Free Planning with Diffusion for Autonomous and Instruction-Guided Driving · CVPR 2024 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
trajectory optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Diffusion-ES: Gradient-Free Planning with Diffusion for Autonomous and Instruction-Guided Driving · CVPR 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › part-based representation learning
unsupervised part discovery |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Learning Hierarchical Image Segmentation For Recognition and By Recognition · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
diffusion model adaptation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Test-time Adaptation of Discriminative Models via Diffusion Generative Feedback · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
test-time adaptation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Test-time Adaptation of Discriminative Models via Diffusion Generative Feedback · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › clustering
hierarchical clustering |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Unsupervised Hierarchical Semantic Segmentation with Multiview Cosegmentation and Clustering Transformers · CVPR 2022 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › annotation-efficient segmentation
unsupervised semantic segmentation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Unsupervised Hierarchical Semantic Segmentation with Multiview Cosegmentation and Clustering Transformers · CVPR 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Universal Weakly Supervised Segmentation by Pixel-to-Segment Contrastive Learning · ICLR 2021 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › semantic segmentation
weakly supervised semantic segmentation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Universal Weakly Supervised Segmentation by Pixel-to-Segment Contrastive Learning · ICLR 2021 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
depth estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Adversarial Structure Matching for Structured Prediction Tasks · CVPR 2019 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › depth estimation
monocular depth estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Adversarial Structure Matching for Structured Prediction Tasks · CVPR 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
structured prediction |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Adversarial Structure Matching for Structured Prediction Tasks · CVPR 2019 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
surface normal estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Adversarial Structure Matching for Structured Prediction Tasks · CVPR 2019 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative feedback |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Test-time Adaptation of Discriminative Models via Diffusion Generative Feedback · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › image segmentation › co-segmentation
multiview co-segmentation |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Unsupervised Hierarchical Semantic Segmentation with Multiview Cosegmentation and Clustering Transformers · CVPR 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness
adversarial training |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Adversarial Structure Matching for Structured Prediction Tasks · CVPR 2019 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
affinity learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Adaptive Affinity Fields for Semantic Segmentation · ECCV (1) 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
diffusion model · 1.4vision transformer · 0.8graph pooling · 0.8gradient-free optimization · 0.8evolutionary search · 0.8LLM prompting · 0.8generative feedback · 0.7contrastive feature learning · 0.6co-segmentation · 0.6clustering transformers · 0.6multigrid methods · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Diffusion-ES: Gradient-Free Planning with Diffusion for Autonomous and Instruction-Guided DrivingabstractDiffusion models excel at modeling complex and multi-modal trajectory distributions for decision-making and control. Reward-gradient guided denoising has been recently proposed to generate trajectories that maximize both a differentiable reward function and the likelihood under the data distribution captured by a diffusion model. Reward-gradient guided denoising requires a differentiable reward function fitted to both clean and noised samples, limiting its applicability as a general trajectory optimizer. In this paper, we propose Diffusion-ES, a method that combines gradient-free optimization with trajectory denoising to optimize black-box non-differentiable objectives while staying in the data manifold. Diffusion-ES samples trajectories during evolutionary search from a diffusion model and scores them using a black-box reward function. It mutates high-scoring trajecto-ries using a truncated diffusion process that applies a small number of noising and denoising steps, allowing for much more efficient exploration of the solution space. We show that Diffusion-Ex achieves state-of-the-art performance on nuPlan, an established closed-loop planning benchmark for autonomous driving. Diffusion-ES outperforms existing sampling-based planners, reactive deterministic or diffusion-based policies, and reward-gradient guidance. Additionally, we show that unlike prior guidance methods, our method can optimize non-differentiable language-shaped reward functions generated by few-shot LLM prompting. When guided by a human teacher that issues instructions to follow, our method can generate novel, highly complex behaviors, such as aggressive lane weaving, which are not present in the training data. This allows us to solve the hardest nuPlan scenarios which are beyond the capabilities of existing tra-jectory optimization methods and driving policies.11Project page: diffusion-es.github.io Brian Yang, Huangyuan Su, Nikolaos Gkanatsios, Tsung-Wei Ke, Jeff G. Schneider, Katerina Fragkiadaki |
CVPR | 4 |
| 2024 | Learning Hierarchical Image Segmentation For Recognition and By RecognitionabstractLarge vision and language models learned directly through image-text associations often lack detailed visual substantiation, whereas image segmentation tasks are treated separately from recognition, supervisedly learned without interconnections.
Our key observation is that, while an image can be recognized in multiple ways, each has a consistent part-and-whole visual organization. Segmentation thus should be treated not as an end task to be mastered through supervised learning, but as an internal process that evolves with and supports the ultimate goal of recognition.
We propose to integrate a hierarchical segmenter into the recognition process,
{\it train} and {\it adapt} the entire model solely on image-level recognition objectives. We learn hierarchical segmentation {\it for free} alongside recognition, automatically uncovering part-to-whole relationships that not only underpin but also enhance recognition.
Enhancing the Vision Transformer (ViT) with adaptive segment tokens and graph pooling, our model surpasses ViT in unsupervised part-whole discovery, semantic segmentation, image classification, and efficiency. Notably, our model (trained on {\it unlabeled} 1M ImageNet images) outperforms SAM (trained on 11M images and 1 billion masks) by absolute 8\% in mIoU on PartImageNet object segmentation. Tsung-Wei Ke, Sangwoo Mo, Stella X. Yu |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2023 | Test-time Adaptation of Discriminative Models via Diffusion Generative Feedback
Mihir Prabhudesai, Tsung-Wei Ke, Alexander C. Li, Deepak Pathak, Katerina Fragkiadaki |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2023 | Local pseudo-attributes for long-tailed recognition
Dong-Jin Kim 0003, Tsung-Wei Ke, Stella X. Yu |
Pattern Recognit. Lett. | 2 |
| 2022 | Unsupervised Hierarchical Semantic Segmentation with Multiview Cosegmentation and Clustering TransformersabstractUnsupervised semantic segmentation aims to discover groupings within and across images that capture object-and view-invariance of a category without external supervision. Grouping naturally has levels of granularity, creating ambiguity in unsupervised segmentation. Existing methods avoid this ambiguity and treat it as a factor outside modeling, whereas we embrace it and desire hierarchical grouping consistency for unsupervised segmentation. We approach unsupervised segmentation as a pixel-wise feature learning problem. Our idea is that a good representation shall reveal not just a particular level of grouping, but any level of grouping in a consistent and predictable manner. We enforce spatial consistency of grouping and bootstrap feature learning with co-segmentation among multiple views of the same image, and enforce semantic consistency across the grouping hierarchy with clustering transformers between coarse- and fine-grained features. We deliver the first data-driven unsupervised hierarchical semantic segmentation method called Hierarchical Segment Grouping (HSG). Capturing visual similarity and statistical co-occurrences, HSG also outperforms existing un-supervised segmentation methods by a large margin on five major object- and scene-centric benchmarks. Tsung-Wei Ke, Jyh-Jing Hwang, Yunhui Guo, Xudong Wang 0007, Stella X. Yu |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2021 | Universal Weakly Supervised Segmentation by Pixel-to-Segment Contrastive Learning
Tsung-Wei Ke, Jyh-Jing Hwang, Stella X. Yu |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2019 | Adversarial Structure Matching for Structured Prediction TasksabstractPixel-wise losses, i.e., cross-entropy or L2, have been widely used in structured prediction tasks as a spatial extension of generic image classification or regression. However, its i.i.d. assumption neglects the structural regularity present in natural images. Various attempts have been made to incorporate structural reasoning mostly through structure priors in a cooperative way where co-occurring patterns are encouraged. We, on the other hand, approach this problem from an opposing angle and propose a new framework, Adversarial Structure Matching (ASM), for training such structured prediction networks via an adversarial process, in which we train a structure analyzer that provides the supervisory signals, the ASM loss. The structure analyzer is trained to maximize ASM loss, or to emphasize recurring multi-scale hard negative structural mistakes usually among co-occurring patterns. On the contrary, the structured prediction network is trained to reduce those mistakes and is thus enabled to distinguish fine-grained structures. As a result, training structured prediction networks using ASM reduces contextual confusion among objects and improves boundary localization. We demonstrate that ASM outperforms its pixel-wise counterpart and commonly used structure priors, GAN, on three different structured prediction tasks, namely, semantic segmentation, monocular depth estimation, and surface normal prediction. Jyh-Jing Hwang, Tsung-Wei Ke, Jianbo Shi, Stella X. Yu |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2018 | Adaptive Affinity Fields for Semantic Segmentation
Tsung-Wei Ke, Jyh-Jing Hwang, Ziwei Liu 0002, Stella X. Yu |
ECCV (1) | 1 |
| 2017 | Multigrid Neural Architectures
Tsung-Wei Ke, Michael Maire, Stella X. Yu |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2017 | Mooney face classification and prediction by learning across toneabstractMooney faces are special two-tone images that elicit a rich impression of identity and facial expression in human observers. While Mooney faces are important, there exist only a small number of instances hand-crafted from source photos which are often no longer available. We first apply deep learning methods to generate a plausible Mooney face automatically from any face photo. We are then able to create a large-scale face dataset with paired grayscale and two-tone images. We then study how well two-tone versions make face predictions, using conditional Generative Adversarial Networks. We show that faces predicted from Mooney images bear striking resemblance to source photos, and they are better than two-tone images obtained by global intensity thresholding. We also demonstrate remarkable face predictions from very low resolution surveillance photos. Our findings reveal great potentials of combining deep learning and Mooney faces for more effective face recognition in a wide range of conditions. Tsung-Wei Ke, Stella X. Yu, David Whitney |
ICIP | 1 |
| 2016 | Variational Convolutional Networks for Human-Centric Annotations
Tsung-Wei Ke, Che-Wei Lin, Tyng-Luh Liu, Davi Geiger |
ACCV (4) | 1 |
| 2016 | Recursive reduction net for large-scale high-dimensional dataabstractPerforming dimensionality reduction on features is essential in tackling a majority of large-scale computer vision and pattern recognition problems. The popularity of adopting high-dimensional descriptors has caused conventional techniques such as PCA inefficient or even unfeasible. We introduce an unsupervised deep-net approach, termed as recursive reduction net (RRN), to carrying out dimensionality reduction for large-scale high-dimensional data. The proposed iterative algorithm is designed to learn how to merge piecewise reduction results effectively. To this end, we use PCA as the teacher model to establish a reduction net and a fusion net, respectively. To demonstrate the usefulness of RRN, we evaluate the property of variance explaining and carry out extensive experiments on similarity search via binary coding, which would benefit from a proper dimensionality-reduction scheme. Tsung-Wei Ke, Tyng-Luh Liu |
ICIP | 1 |