EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ajil Jalal
dblp:173/5088
· DBLP profile ↗
12ranked-venue papers
5as first author
8since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0006-9244-8575ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 5 first-author · 7 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
9 papers |
Generative modeling · 52% Learning theory · 17% Trustworthy machine learning · 14% | |
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Computational complexity · 64% Information theory · 36% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Physical-layer communications · 77% Cellular and mobile networks · 23% |
Topics — the 20 heaviest of 23, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative prior
deep generative prior |
1.1 | 3 | 2021 | Robust Compressed Sensing MRI with Deep Generative Priors · NeurIPS 2021 Robust compressed sensing using generative models · NeurIPS 2020 Instance-Optimal Compressed Sensing via Posterior Sampling · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Diffusion Posterior Sampling is Computationally Intractable · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › sampling
posterior sampling |
0.7 | 2 | 2024 | Instance-Optimal Compressed Sensing via Posterior Sampling · ICML 2021 Diffusion Posterior Sampling is Computationally Intractable · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
conditional generative model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Learning a 1-layer conditional generative model in total variation · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Learning a 1-layer conditional generative model in total variation · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Instance-Optimal Compressed Sensing via Posterior Sampling · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
compressed sensing |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Instance-Optimal Compressed Sensing via Posterior Sampling · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Fairness for Image Generation with Uncertain Sensitive Attributes · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
group fairness |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Fairness for Image Generation with Uncertain Sensitive Attributes · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
inverse problem |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Intermediate Layer Optimization for Inverse Problems using Deep Generative Models · ICML 2021 |
Physical-layer communications
channel estimation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | High Dimensional Channel Estimation Using Deep Generative Networks · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2021 |
Information theory › signal processing
compressed sensing |
0.4 | 2 | 2020 | Compressed Sensing using Generative Models · ICML 2017 Robust compressed sensing using generative models · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
computational learning theory |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Inverting Deep Generative models, One layer at a time · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
ReLU networks |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Learning a 1-layer conditional generative model in total variation · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › fairness criteria
demographic parity |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Fairness for Image Generation with Uncertain Sensitive Attributes · ICML 2021 |
Medical and health informatics
medical image reconstruction |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Robust Compressed Sensing MRI with Deep Generative Priors · NeurIPS 2021 |
Image and video processing › image restoration
inverse problem |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Robust Compressed Sensing MRI with Deep Generative Priors · NeurIPS 2021 |
Cellular and mobile networks
millimeter-wave communication |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | High Dimensional Channel Estimation Using Deep Generative Networks · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Robust compressed sensing using generative models · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
non-convex optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Inverting Deep Generative models, One layer at a time · NeurIPS 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
posterior sampling · 2.0langevin dynamics · 2.0compressed sensing · 2.0rejection sampling · 1.5reduction from one-way functions · 1.5total variation distance · 0.7sample complexity · 0.7wasserstein distance · 0.5orthogonal matching pursuit · 0.5latent space optimization · 0.5l1 ball search · 0.5deep generative network · 0.5approximate message passing · 0.5median-of-means · 0.4empirical risk minimization · 0.4variational autoencoder · 0.3lasso · 0.3generative model · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Diffusion Posterior Sampling is Computationally IntractableabstractDiffusion models are a remarkably effective way of learning and sampling from a distribution $p(x)$. In posterior sampling, one is also given a measurement model $p(y \mid x)$ and a measurement $y$, and would like to sample from $p(x \mid y)$. Posterior sampling is useful for tasks such as inpainting, super-resolution, and MRI reconstruction, so a number of recent works have given algorithms to heuristically approximate it; but none are known to converge to the correct distribution in polynomial time. In this paper we show that posterior sampling is computationally intractable: under the most basic assumption in cryptography—that one-way functions exist—there are instances for which every algorithm takes superpolynomial time, even though unconditional sampling is provably fast. We also show that the exponential-time rejection sampling algorithm is essentially optimal under the stronger plausible assumption that there are one-way functions that take exponential time to invert. Shivam Gupta 0002, Ajil Jalal, Aditya Parulekar, Eric Price 0001, Zhiyang Xun |
ICML | 2 |
| 2023 | Permod: Perceptually Grounded Voice Modification With Latent Diffusion ModelsabstractPerceptual modification of voice is an elusive goal. While non-experts can modify an image or sentence perceptually with available tools, it is not clear how to similarly modify speech along perceptual axes. Voice conversion does make it possible to convert one voice to another, but these modifications are handled by black box models, and the specifics of what perceptual qualities to modify and how to modify them are unclear. Towards allowing greater perceptual control over voice, we introduce PerMod, a conditional latent diffusion model that takes in an input voice and a perceptual qualities vector, and produces a voice with the matching perceptual qualities. Unlike prior work, PerMod generates a new voice corresponding to specific perceptual modifications. Evaluating perceptual quality vectors with RMSE from both human and predicted labels, we demonstrate that PerMod produces voices with the desired perceptual qualities for typical voices, but performs poorly on atypical voices. Robert Netzorg, Ajil Jalal, Luna McNulty, Gopala Krishna Anumanchipalli |
ASRU | 2 |
| 2023 | Learning a 1-layer conditional generative model in total variationabstractA conditional generative model is a method for sampling from a conditional distribution $p(y \mid x)$. For example, one may want to sample an image of a cat given the label ``cat''. A feed-forward conditional generative model is a function $g(x, z)$ that takes the input $x$ and a random seed $z$, and outputs a sample $y$ from $p(y \mid x)$. Ideally the distribution of outputs $(x, g(x, z))$ would be close in total variation to the ideal distribution $(x, y)$.
Generalization bounds for other learning models require assumptions on the distribution of $x$, even in simple settings like linear regression with Gaussian noise. We show these assumptions are unnecessary in our model, for both linear regression and single-layer ReLU networks. Given samples $(x, y)$, we show how to learn a 1-layer ReLU conditional generative model in total variation. As our result has no assumption on the distribution of inputs $x$, if we are given access to the internal activations of a deep generative model, we can compose our 1-layer guarantee to progressively learn the deep model using a near-linear number of samples. Ajil Jalal, Justin Singh Kang, Ananya Uppal, Kannan Ramchandran, Eric Price 0001 |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2021 | Intermediate Layer Optimization for Inverse Problems using Deep Generative ModelsabstractWe propose Intermediate Layer Optimization (ILO), a novel optimization algorithm for solving inverse problems with deep generative models. Instead of optimizing only over the initial latent code, we progressively change the input layer obtaining successively more expressive generators. To explore the higher dimensional spaces, our method searches for latent codes that lie within a small l1 ball around the manifold induced by the previous layer. Our theoretical analysis shows that by keeping the radius of the ball relatively small, we can improve the established error bound for compressed sensing with deep generative models. We empirically show that our approach outperforms state-of-the-art methods introduced in StyleGAN2 and PULSE for a wide range of inverse problems including inpainting, denoising, super-resolution and compressed sensing. Giannis Daras, Joseph Dean, Ajil Jalal, Alexandros G. Dimakis |
ICML | 3 |
| 2021 | Instance-Optimal Compressed Sensing via Posterior SamplingabstractWe characterize the measurement complexity of compressed sensing of signals drawn from a known prior distribution, even when the support of the prior is the entire space (rather than, say, sparse vectors). We show for Gaussian measurements and \emph{any} prior distribution on the signal, that the posterior sampling estimator achieves near-optimal recovery guarantees. Moreover, this result is robust to model mismatch, as long as the distribution estimate (e.g., from an invertible generative model) is close to the true distribution in Wasserstein distance. We implement the posterior sampling estimator for deep generative priors using Langevin dynamics, and empirically find that it produces accurate estimates with more diversity than MAP. Ajil Jalal, Sushrut Karmalkar, Alexandros G. Dimakis, Eric Price 0001 |
ICML | 1 |
| 2021 | Fairness for Image Generation with Uncertain Sensitive AttributesabstractThis work tackles the issue of fairness in the context of generative procedures, such as image super-resolution, which entail different definitions from the standard classification setting. Moreover, while traditional group fairness definitions are typically defined with respect to specified protected groups – camouflaging the fact that these groupings are artificial and carry historical and political motivations – we emphasize that there are no ground truth identities. For instance, should South and East Asians be viewed as a single group or separate groups? Should we consider one race as a whole or further split by gender? Choosing which groups are valid and who belongs in them is an impossible dilemma and being “fair” with respect to Asians may require being “unfair” with respect to South Asians. This motivates the introduction of definitions that allow algorithms to be \emph{oblivious} to the relevant groupings. We define several intuitive notions of group fairness and study their incompatibilities and trade-offs. We show that the natural extension of demographic parity is strongly dependent on the grouping, and \emph{impossible} to achieve obliviously. On the other hand, the conceptually new definition we introduce, Conditional Proportional Representation, can be achieved obliviously through Posterior Sampling. Our experiments validate our theoretical results and achieve fair image reconstruction using state-of-the-art generative models. Ajil Jalal, Sushrut Karmalkar, Jessica Hoffmann, Alexandros G. Dimakis, Eric Price 0001 |
ICML | 1 |
| 2021 | Robust Compressed Sensing MRI with Deep Generative PriorsabstractThe CSGM framework (Bora-Jalal-Price-Dimakis'17) has shown that deepgenerative priors can be powerful tools for solving inverse problems.However, to date this framework has been empirically successful only oncertain datasets (for example, human faces and MNIST digits), and itis known to perform poorly on out-of-distribution samples. In thispaper, we present the first successful application of the CSGMframework on clinical MRI data. We train a generative prior on brainscans from the fastMRI dataset, and show that posterior sampling viaLangevin dynamics achieves high quality reconstructions. Furthermore,our experiments and theory show that posterior sampling is robust tochanges in the ground-truth distribution and measurement process.Our code and models are available at: \url{https://github.com/utcsilab/csgm-mri-langevin}. Ajil Jalal, Marius Arvinte, Giannis Daras, Eric Price 0001, Alexandros G. Dimakis, Jonathan I. Tamir |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2021 | High Dimensional Channel Estimation Using Deep Generative NetworksabstractThis paper presents a novel compressed sensing (CS) approach to high dimensional wireless channel estimation by optimizing the input to a deep generative network. Channel estimation using generative networks relies on the assumption that the reconstructed channel lies in the range of a generative model. Channel reconstruction using generative priors outperforms conventional CS techniques and requires fewer pilots. It also eliminates the need of a priori knowledge of the sparsifying basis, instead using the structure captured by the deep generative model as a prior. Using this prior, we also perform channel estimation from one-bit quantized pilot measurements, and propose a novel optimization objective function that attempts to maximize the correlation between the received signal and the generator's channel estimate while minimizing the rank of the channel estimate. Our approach significantly outperforms sparse signal recovery methods such as Orthogonal Matching Pursuit (OMP) and Approximate Message Passing (AMP) algorithms such as EM-GM-AMP for narrowband mmWave channel reconstruction, and its execution time is not noticeably affected by the increase in the number of received pilot symbols. Eren Balevi, Akash Doshi, Ajil Jalal, Alexandros G. Dimakis, Jeffrey G. Andrews |
IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. | 3 |
| 2020 | Robust compressed sensing using generative modelsabstractWe consider estimating a high dimensional signal in $\R^n$ using a sublinear number of linear measurements. In analogy to classical compressed sensing, here we assume a generative model as a prior, that is, we assume the signal is represented by a deep generative model $G: \R^k \rightarrow \R^n$. Classical recovery approaches such as empirical risk minimization (ERM) are guaranteed to succeed when the measurement matrix is sub-Gaussian. However, when the measurement matrix and measurements are heavy tailed or have outliers, recovery may fail dramatically. In this paper we propose an algorithm inspired by the Median-of-Means (MOM). Our algorithm guarantees recovery for heavy tailed data, even in the presence of outliers. Theoretically, our results show our novel MOM-based algorithm enjoys the same sample complexity guarantees as ERM under sub-Gaussian assumptions. Our experiments validate both aspects of our claims: other algorithms are indeed fragile and fail under heavy tailed and/or corrupted data, while our approach exhibits the predicted robustness. Ajil Jalal, Alexandros G. Dimakis, Constantine Caramanis |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2019 | Inverting Deep Generative models, One layer at a timeabstractWe study the problem of inverting a deep generative model with ReLU activations. Inversion corresponds to finding a latent code vector that explains observed measurements as much as possible. In most prior works this is performed by attempting to solve a non-convex optimization problem involving the generator. In this paper we obtain several novel theoretical results for the inversion problem. We show that for the realizable case, single layer inversion can be performed exactly in polynomial time, by solving a linear program. Further, we show that for two layers, inversion is NP-hard to recover binary latent code (even for the realizable case) and the pre-image set can be non-convex. For generative models of arbitrary depth, we show that exact recovery is possible in polynomial time with high probability, if the layers are expanding and the weights are randomly selected. Very recent work analyzed the same problem for gradient descent inversion. Their analysis requires significantly higher expansion (logarithmic in the latent dimension) while our proposed algorithm can provably reconstruct even with constant factor expansion. We also provide provable error bounds for different norms for reconstructing noisy observations. Our empirical validation demonstrates that we obtain better reconstructions when the latent dimension is large. Ajil Jalal, Inderjit S. Dhillon, Alexandros G. Dimakis |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2017 | Compressed Sensing using Generative ModelsabstractThe goal of compressed sensing is to estimate a vector from an underdetermined system of noisy linear measurements, by making use of prior knowledge on the structure of vectors in the relevant domain. For almost all results in this literature, the structure is represented by sparsity in a well-chosen basis. We show how to achieve guarantees similar to standard compressed sensing but without employing sparsity at all. Instead, we suppose that vectors lie near the range of a generative model $G: \mathbb{R}^k \to \mathbb{R}^n$. Our main theorem is that, if $G$ is $L$-Lipschitz, then roughly $\mathcal{O}(k \log L)$ random Gaussian measurements suffice for an $\ell_2/\ell_2$ recovery guarantee. We demonstrate our results using generative models from published variational autoencoder and generative adversarial networks. Our method can use $5$-$10$x fewer measurements than Lasso for the same accuracy. Ashish Bora, Ajil Jalal, Eric Price 0001, Alexandros G. Dimakis |
ICML | 2 |
| 2016 | The Adwords Problem with Strict Capacity ConstraintsabstractWe study an online assignment problem where the offline servers have capacities, and the objective is to obtain a maximum-weight assignment of requests that arrive online. The weight of edges incident to any server can be at most the server capacity. Our problem is related to the adwords problem, where the assignment to a server is allowed to exceed its capacity. In many applications, however, server capacities are strict and partially-served requests are of no use, motivating the problem we study. While no deterministic algorithm can be competitive in general for this problem, we give an algorithm with competitive ratio that depends on the ratio of maximum weight of any edge to the capacity of the server it is incident to. If this ratio is 1/2, our algorithm is tight. Further, we give a randomized algorithm that is 6-competitive in expectation for the general problem. Most previous work on the problem and its variants assumes that the edge weights are much smaller than server capacities. Our guarantee, in contrast, does not require any assumptions about job weights. We also give improved lower bounds for both deterministic and randomized algorithms. For the special case of parallel servers, we show that a load-balancing algorithm is tight and near-optimal. Umang Bhaskar, Ajil Jalal, Rahul Vaze |
FSTTCS | 2 |