Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Gilwoo Lee

dblp:173/5976 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
4as first author
2since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 4 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 39% Reinforcement learning · 22% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 13%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning
anytime planning
0.412020
Posterior Sampling for Anytime Motion Planning on Graphs with Expensive-to-Evaluate Edges · ICRA 2020
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning
0.412020
Posterior Sampling for Anytime Motion Planning on Graphs with Expensive-to-Evaluate Edges · ICRA 2020
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › sampling
posterior sampling
0.412020
Posterior Sampling for Anytime Motion Planning on Graphs with Expensive-to-Evaluate Edges · ICRA 2020
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning
sampling-based motion planning
0.412020
Posterior Sampling for Anytime Motion Planning on Graphs with Expensive-to-Evaluate Edges · ICRA 2020
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy search
bayesian policy search
0.412019
Bayesian Policy Optimization for Model Uncertainty · ICLR (Poster) 2019
Computer vision › 3D vision › motion capture
motion capture dataset
0.412019
Talking With Hands 16.2M: A Large-Scale Dataset of Synchronized Body-Finger Motion and Audio for Conversational Motion Analysis and Synthesis · ICCV 2019
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization
0.412019
Bayesian Policy Optimization for Model Uncertainty · ICLR (Poster) 2019
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
model uncertainty
0.112019
Bayesian Policy Optimization for Model Uncertainty · ICLR (Poster) 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

regret bounds · 0.4posterior sampling · 0.4temporal neural network · 0.4model-based reinforcement learning · 0.4inverse kinematics loss · 0.4bayesian inference · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Bayesian Residual Policy Optimization: : Scalable Bayesian Reinforcement Learning with Clairvoyant Experts
abstract
Informed and robust decision making in the face of uncertainty is critical for robots operating in unstructured environments. We formulate this as Bayesian Reinforcement Learning over latent Markov Decision Processes (MDPs). While Bayes-optimality is theoretically the gold standard, existing algorithms scale poorly to continuous state and action spaces. We build on the following insight: in the absence of uncertainty, each latent MDP is easier to solve. We first obtain an ensemble of experts, one for each latent MDP, and fuse their advice to compute a baseline policy. Next, we train a Bayesian residual policy to improve upon the ensemble’s recommendation and learn to reduce uncertainty. Our algorithm, Bayesian Residual Policy Optimization (BRPO), imports the scalability of policy gradient methods and task-specific expert skills. BRPO significantly improves the ensemble of experts and drastically outperforms existing adaptive RL methods, both in simulated and physical robot experiments.
Gilwoo Lee, Brian Hou, Sanjiban Choudhury, Siddhartha S. Srinivasa
IROS1
2021 Imitation Learning as f-Divergence Minimization
Liyiming Ke, Sanjiban Choudhury, Matt Barnes 0001, Wen Sun 0002, Gilwoo Lee, Siddhartha S. Srinivasa
WAFR5
2020 Posterior Sampling for Anytime Motion Planning on Graphs with Expensive-to-Evaluate Edges
abstract
Collision checking is a computational bottleneck in motion planning, requiring lazy algorithms that explicitly reason about when to perform this computation. Optimism in the face of collision uncertainty minimizes the number of checks before finding the shortest path. However, this may take a prohibitively long time to compute, with no other feasible paths discovered during this period. For many real-time applications, we instead demand strong anytime performance, defined as minimizing the cumulative lengths of the feasible paths yielded over time. We introduce Posterior Sampling for Motion Planning (PSMP), an anytime lazy motion planning algorithm that leverages learned posteriors on edge collisions to quickly discover an initial feasible path and progressively yield shorter paths. PSMP obtains an expected regret bound of Õ(√(SAT)) and outperforms comparative baselines on a set of 2D and 7D planning problems.
Brian Hou, Sanjiban Choudhury, Gilwoo Lee, Aditya Mandalika, Siddhartha S. Srinivasa
ICRA3
2019 Talking With Hands 16.2M: A Large-Scale Dataset of Synchronized Body-Finger Motion and Audio for Conversational Motion Analysis and Synthesis
abstract
We present a 16.2-million frame (50-hour) multimodal dataset of two-person face-to-face spontaneous conversations. Our dataset features synchronized body and finger motion as well as audio data. To the best of our knowledge, it represents the largest motion capture and audio dataset of natural conversations to date. The statistical analysis verifies strong intraperson and interperson covariance of arm, hand, and speech features, potentially enabling new directions on data-driven social behavior analysis, prediction, and synthesis. As an illustration, we propose a novel real-time finger motion synthesis method: a temporal neural network innovatively trained with an inverse kinematics (IK) loss, which adds skeletal structural information to the generative model. Our qualitative user study shows that the finger motion generated by our method is perceived as natural and conversation enhancing, while the quantitative ablation study demonstrates the effectiveness of IK loss.
Gilwoo Lee, Zhiwei Deng, Shugao Ma, Takaaki Shiratori, Siddhartha S. Srinivasa, Yaser Sheikh
ICCV1
2019 Bayesian Policy Optimization for Model Uncertainty
Gilwoo Lee, Brian Hou, Aditya Mandalika, Jeongseok Lee, Sanjiban Choudhury, Siddhartha S. Srinivasa
ICLR (Poster)1
2019 Robot-Assisted Feeding: Generalizing Skewering Strategies Across Food Items on a Plate
Ryan Feng, Youngsun Kim, Gilwoo Lee, Ethan K. Gordon, Matt Schmittle, Shivaum Kumar, Tapomayukh Bhattacharjee, Siddhartha S. Srinivasa
ISRR3
2015 Hierarchical planning for multi-contact non-prehensile manipulation
abstract
Manipulation planning involves planning the combined motion of objects in the environment as well as the robot motions to achieve them. In this paper, we explore a hierarchical approach to planning sequences of non-prehensile and prehensile actions. We subdivide the planning problem into three stages (object contacts, object poses and robot contacts) and thereby reduce the size of search space that is explored. We show that this approach is more efficient than earlier strategies that search in the combined robot-object configuration space directly.
Gilwoo Lee, Tomás Lozano-Pérez, Leslie Pack Kaelbling
IROS1