Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Marko Doko

dblp:173/6746 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0001-6573-8346ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 4 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Concurrent programming · 39% Program verification · 30% Programming languages and type systems · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Programming languages and type systems › program specification
declarative specification
0.412019
On library correctness under weak memory consistency: specifying and verifying concurrent libraries under declarative consistency models · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2019
Program verification
modular verification
0.412019
On library correctness under weak memory consistency: specifying and verifying concurrent libraries under declarative consistency models · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2019
Concurrent programming › memory models
weak memory models
0.412019
On library correctness under weak memory consistency: specifying and verifying concurrent libraries under declarative consistency models · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2019
Concurrent programming
memory models
0.112019
On library correctness under weak memory consistency: specifying and verifying concurrent libraries under declarative consistency models · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

declarative framework · 0.4compositional verification · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 On library correctness under weak memory consistency: specifying and verifying concurrent libraries under declarative consistency models
abstract
Concurrent libraries are the building blocks for concurrency. They encompass a range of abstractions (locks, exchangers, stacks, queues, sets) built in a layered fashion: more advanced libraries are built out of simpler ones. While there has been a lot of work on verifying such libraries in a sequentially consistent (SC) environment, little is known about how to specify and verify them under weak memory consistency (WMC). We propose a general declarative framework that allows us to specify concurrent libraries declaratively, and to verify library implementations against their specifications compositionally. Our framework is sufficient to encode standard models such as SC, (R)C11 and TSO. Additionally, we specify several concurrent libraries, including mutual exclusion locks, reader-writer locks, exchangers, queues, stacks and sets. We then use our framework to verify multiple weakly consistent implementations of locks, exchangers, queues and stacks.
Azalea Raad, Marko Doko, Lovro Rozic, Ori Lahav 0001, Viktor Vafeiadis
Proc. ACM Program. Lang.2
2018 A Separation Logic for a Promising Semantics
abstract
We present SLR, the first expressive program logic for reasoning about concurrent programs under a weak memory model addressing the out-of-thin-air problem. Our logic includes the standard features from existing logics, such as RSL and GPS, that were previously known to be sound only under stronger memory models: (1) separation, (2) per-location invariants, and (3) ownership transfer via release-acquire synchronisation—as well as novel features for reasoning about (4) the absence of out-of-thin-air behaviours and (5) coherence. The logic is proved sound over the recent “promising” memory model of Kang et al., using a substantially different argument to soundness proofs of logics for simpler memory models.
Kasper Svendsen, Jean Pichon-Pharabod, Marko Doko, Ori Lahav 0001, Viktor Vafeiadis
ESOP3
2017 Tackling Real-Life Relaxed Concurrency with FSL++
Marko Doko, Viktor Vafeiadis
ESOP1
2016 A Program Logic for C11 Memory Fences
Marko Doko, Viktor Vafeiadis
VMCAI1