Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Vincent Samy

dblp:173/7721 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
compliant motion control
0.312017
QP-based adaptive-gains compliance control in humanoid falls · ICRA 2017
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › whole-body control
humanoid fall control
0.312017
QP-based adaptive-gains compliance control in humanoid falls · ICRA 2017
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.312017
QP-based adaptive-gains compliance control in humanoid falls · ICRA 2017
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › optimization-based control
quadratic programming control
0.112017
QP-based adaptive-gains compliance control in humanoid falls · ICRA 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

quadratic programming · 0.3contact force constraints · 0.3adaptive PD gains · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 QP-based adaptive-gains compliance control in humanoid falls
abstract
We address the problem of humanoid falling with a decoupled strategy consisting of a pre-impact and a postimpact stage. In the pre-impact stage, geometrical reasoning allows the robot to choose appropriate impact points in the surrounding environment and to adopt a posture to reach them while avoiding impact-singularities and preparing for the postimpact. The surrounding environment can be unstructured and may contain cluttered obstacles. The post-impact stage uses a quadratic program controller that adapts on-line the joint proportional-derivative (PD) gains to make the robot compliant-to absorb impact and post-impact dynamics, which lowers possible damage risks. This is done by a new approach incorporating the stiffness and damping gains directly as decision variables in the QP along with the usually-considered variables of joint accelerations and contact forces. Constraints of the QP prevent the motors from reaching their torque limits during the fall. Several experiments on the humanoid robot HRP-4 in a full-dynamics simulator are presented and discussed.
Vincent Samy, Karim Bouyarmane, Abderrahmane Kheddar
ICRA1