EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Wenlong Mou
dblp:174/0844
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
6as first author
4since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 6 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
9 papers |
Learning theory · 29% Optimization for machine learning · 27% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 21% | |
| Network and information security
3 papers |
Privacy and data protection · 100% |
Topics — the 27 heaviest of 28, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | An Efficient Sampling Algorithm for Non-smooth Composite Potentials · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 High-Order Langevin Diffusion Yields an Accelerated MCMC Algorithm · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic approximation |
1.0 | 2 | 2022 | Optimal and instance-dependent guarantees for Markovian linear stochastic approximation · COLT 2022 On Linear Stochastic Approximation: Fine-grained Polyak-Ruppert and Non-Asymptotic Concentration · COLT 2020 |
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
0.9 | 3 | 2017 | Efficient Private ERM for Smooth Objectives · IJCAI 2017 Differentially Private Clustering in High-Dimensional Euclidean Spaces · ICML 2017 Collect at Once, Use Effectively: Making Non-interactive Locally Private Learning Possible · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy evaluation |
0.7 | 2 | 2022 | Optimal and instance-dependent guarantees for Markovian linear stochastic approximation · COLT 2022 On Linear Stochastic Approximation: Fine-grained Polyak-Ruppert and Non-Asymptotic Concentration · COLT 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
temporal difference learning |
0.7 | 2 | 2022 | Optimal and instance-dependent guarantees for Markovian linear stochastic approximation · COLT 2022 On Linear Stochastic Approximation: Fine-grained Polyak-Ruppert and Non-Asymptotic Concentration · COLT 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds |
0.7 | 2 | 2018 | Dropout Training, Data-dependent Regularization, and Generalization Bounds · ICML 2018 Generalization Bounds of SGLD for Non-convex Learning: Two Theoretical Viewpoints · COLT 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo
metropolis-hastings |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | An Efficient Sampling Algorithm for Non-smooth Composite Potentials · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient methods |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | ROOT-SGD: Sharp Nonasymptotics and Asymptotic Efficiency in a Single Algorithm · COLT 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | ROOT-SGD: Sharp Nonasymptotics and Asymptotic Efficiency in a Single Algorithm · COLT 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › temporal difference learning › eligibility traces
TD(lambda) |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Optimal and instance-dependent guarantees for Markovian linear stochastic approximation · COLT 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo
langevin dynamics |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | High-Order Langevin Diffusion Yields an Accelerated MCMC Algorithm · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical learning theory
asymptotic analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | On Linear Stochastic Approximation: Fine-grained Polyak-Ruppert and Non-Asymptotic Concentration · COLT 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › stochastic approximation
linear stochastic approximation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | On Linear Stochastic Approximation: Fine-grained Polyak-Ruppert and Non-Asymptotic Concentration · COLT 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › iterate averaging
polyak-ruppert averaging |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | On Linear Stochastic Approximation: Fine-grained Polyak-Ruppert and Non-Asymptotic Concentration · COLT 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical learning theory › regularization theory
data-dependent regularization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Dropout Training, Data-dependent Regularization, and Generalization Bounds · ICML 2018 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization
dropout |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Dropout Training, Data-dependent Regularization, and Generalization Bounds · ICML 2018 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Generalization Bounds of SGLD for Non-convex Learning: Two Theoretical Viewpoints · COLT 2018 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
PAC-Bayes bounds |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Generalization Bounds of SGLD for Non-convex Learning: Two Theoretical Viewpoints · COLT 2018 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
rademacher complexity |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Dropout Training, Data-dependent Regularization, and Generalization Bounds · ICML 2018 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
regularization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Dropout Training, Data-dependent Regularization, and Generalization Bounds · ICML 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo › langevin dynamics
stochastic gradient langevin dynamics |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Generalization Bounds of SGLD for Non-convex Learning: Two Theoretical Viewpoints · COLT 2018 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
empirical risk minimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Efficient Private ERM for Smooth Objectives · IJCAI 2017 |
Data mining
clustering |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Differentially Private Clustering in High-Dimensional Euclidean Spaces · ICML 2017 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
local differential privacy |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Collect at Once, Use Effectively: Making Non-interactive Locally Private Learning Possible · ICML 2017 |
Privacy and data protection
privacy-preserving data analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Collect at Once, Use Effectively: Making Non-interactive Locally Private Learning Possible · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
non-convex optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Generalization Bounds of SGLD for Non-convex Learning: Two Theoretical Viewpoints · COLT 2018 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Collect at Once, Use Effectively: Making Non-interactive Locally Private Learning Possible · ICML 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stochastic gradient descent · 1.1non-asymptotic analysis · 0.9recursive averaging · 0.6mixing time analysis · 0.6minimax lower bound · 0.6k-median · 0.6k-means · 0.6high-dimensional euclidean clustering · 0.6stochastic approximation · 0.4concentration inequalities · 0.4central limit theorem · 0.4stability analysis · 0.3PAC-Bayesian theory · 0.3random round · 0.3random projection · 0.3kernel ridge regression · 0.3gradient descent with output perturbation · 0.3chebyshev expansion · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | ROOT-SGD: Sharp Nonasymptotics and Asymptotic Efficiency in a Single AlgorithmabstractWe study the problem of solving strongly convex and smooth unconstrained optimization problems using stochastic first-order algorithms. We devise a novel algorithm, referred to as \emph{Recursive One-Over-T SGD} (ROOT-SGD), based on an easily implementable, recursive averaging of past stochastic gradients. We prove that it simultaneously achieves state-of-the-art performance in both a finite-sample, nonasymptotic sense and an asymptotic sense. On the nonasymptotic side, we prove risk bounds on the last iterate of ROOT-SGD with leading-order terms that match the optimal statistical risk with a unity pre-factor, along with a higher-order term that scales at the sharp rate of $O(n^{-3/2})$ under the Lipschitz condition on the Hessian matrix. On the asymptotic side, we show that when a mild, one-point Hessian continuity condition is imposed, the rescaled last iterate of (multi-epoch) ROOT-SGD converges asymptotically to a Gaussian limit with the Cramér-Rao optimal asymptotic covariance, for a broad range of step-size choices. Chris Junchi Li, Wenlong Mou, Martin J. Wainwright, Michael I. Jordan |
COLT | 2 |
| 2022 | Optimal and instance-dependent guarantees for Markovian linear stochastic approximationabstractWe study stochastic approximation procedures for approximately solving a $d$-dimensional linear fixed point equation based on observing a trajectory of length $n$ from an ergodic Markov chain. We first exhibit a non-asymptotic bound of the order $t_{\mathrm{mix}} \tfrac{d}{n}$ on the squared error of the last iterate of a standard scheme, where $t_{\mathrm{mix}}$ is a mixing time. We then prove a non-asymptotic instance-dependent bound on a suitably averaged sequence of iterates, with a leading term that matches the local asymptotic minimax limit, including sharp dependence on the parameters $(d, t_{\mathrm{mix}})$ in the higher order terms. We complement these upper bounds with a non-asymptotic minimax lower bound that establishes the instance-optimality of the averaged SA estimator. We derive corollaries of these results for policy evaluation with Markov noise—covering the TD($\lambda$) family of algorithms for all $\lambda \in [0, 1)$—and linear autoregressive models. Our instance-dependent characterizations open the door to the design of fine-grained model selection procedures for hyperparameter tuning (e.g., choosing the value of $\lambda$ when running the TD($\lambda$) algorithm). Wenlong Mou, Ashwin Pananjady, Martin J. Wainwright, Peter L. Bartlett |
COLT | 1 |
| 2022 | An Efficient Sampling Algorithm for Non-smooth Composite PotentialsabstractWe consider the problem of sampling from a density of the form $p(x) \propto \exp(-f(x)- g(x))$, where $f: \mathbb{R}^d \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ is a smooth function and $g: \mathbb{R}^d \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ is a convex and Lipschitz function. We propose a new algorithm based on the Metropolis--Hastings framework. Under certain isoperimetric inequalities on the target density, we prove that the algorithm mixes to within total variation (TV) distance $\varepsilon$ of the target density in at most $O(d \log (d/\varepsilon))$ iterations. This guarantee extends previous results on sampling from distributions with smooth log densities ($g = 0$) to the more general composite non-smooth case, with the same mixing time up to a multiple of the condition number. Our method is based on a novel proximal-based proposal distribution that can be efficiently computed for a large class of non-smooth functions $g$. Simulation results on posterior sampling problems that arise from the Bayesian Lasso show empirical advantage over previous proposal distributions. Wenlong Mou, Nicolas Flammarion, Martin J. Wainwright, Peter L. Bartlett |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2021 | High-Order Langevin Diffusion Yields an Accelerated MCMC AlgorithmabstractWe propose a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm based on third-order Langevin dynamics for sampling from distributions with smooth, log-concave densities. The higher-order dynamics allow for more flexible discretization schemes, and we develop a specific method that combines splitting with more accurate integration. For a broad class of $d$-dimensional distributions arising from generalized linear models, we prove that the resulting third-order algorithm produces samples from a distribution that is at most $\varepsilon > 0$ in Wasserstein distance from the target distribution in $O\left(\frac{d^{1/4}}{ \varepsilon^{1/2}} \right)$ steps. This result requires only Lipschitz conditions on the gradient. For general strongly convex potentials with $\alpha$-th order smoothness, we prove that the mixing time scales as $O \left( \frac{d^{1/4}}{\varepsilon^{1/2}} + \frac{d^{1/2}}{ \varepsilon^{1/(\alpha - 1)}} \right)$. Wenlong Mou, Yi-An Ma, Martin J. Wainwright, Peter L. Bartlett, Michael I. Jordan |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2020 | On Linear Stochastic Approximation: Fine-grained Polyak-Ruppert and Non-Asymptotic ConcentrationabstractWe undertake a precise study of the asymptotic and non-asymptotic properties of stochastic approximation procedures with Polyak-Ruppert averaging for solving a linear system $\bar{A} \theta = \bar{b}$. When the matrix $\bar{A}$ is Hurwitz, we prove a central limit theorem (CLT) for the averaged iterates with fixed step size and number of iterations going to infinity. The CLT characterizes the exact asymptotic covariance matrix, which is the sum of the classical Polyak-Ruppert covariance and a correction term that scales with the step size. Under assumptions on the tail of the noise distribution, we prove a non-asymptotic concentration inequality whose main term matches the covariance in CLT in any direction, up to universal constants. When the matrix $\bar{A}$ is not Hurwitz but only has non-negative real parts in its eigenvalues, we prove that the averaged LSA procedure actually achieves an $O(1/T)$ rate in mean-squared error. Our results provide a more refined understanding of linear stochastic approximation in both the asymptotic and non-asymptotic settings. We also show various applications of the main results, including the study of momentum-based stochastic gradient methods as well as temporal difference algorithms in reinforcement learning. Wenlong Mou, Chris Junchi Li, Martin J. Wainwright, Peter L. Bartlett, Michael I. Jordan |
COLT | 1 |
| 2018 | Generalization Bounds of SGLD for Non-convex Learning: Two Theoretical ViewpointsabstractWe study the generalization errors of \emph{non-convex} regularized ERM procedures using Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics (SGLD). Two theories are proposed with non-asymptotic discrete-time analysis, using stability and PAC-Bayesian theory respectively. The stability-based theory obtains a bound of $O\left(\frac{1}{n}L\sqrt{\beta T_N}\right)$, where $L$ is Lipschitz parameter, $\beta$ is inverse temperature, and $T_N$ is the sum of step sizes. For PAC-Bayesian theory, though the bound has a slower $O(1/\sqrt{n})$ rate, the contribution of each step decays exponentially through time, and the uniform Lipschitz constant is also replaced by actual norms of gradients along the optimization trajectory. Our bounds have reasonable dependence on aggregated step sizes, and do not explicitly depend on dimensions, norms or other capacity measures of the parameter. The bounds characterize how the noises in the algorithm itself controls the statistical learning behavior in non-convex problems, without uniform convergence in the hypothesis space, which sheds light on the effect of training algorithms on the generalization error for deep neural networks. Wenlong Mou, Liwei Wang 0001, Xiyu Zhai, Kai Zheng 0007 |
COLT | 1 |
| 2018 | Dropout Training, Data-dependent Regularization, and Generalization BoundsabstractWe study the problem of generalization guarantees for dropout training. A general framework is first proposed for learning procedures with random perturbation on model parameters. The generalization error is bounded by sum of two offset Rademacher complexities: the main term is Rademacher complexity of the hypothesis class with minus offset induced by the perturbation variance, which characterizes data-dependent regularization by the random perturbation; the auxiliary term is offset Rademacher complexity for the variance class, controlling the degree to which this regularization effect can be weakened. For neural networks, we estimate upper and lower bounds for the variance induced by truthful dropout, a variant of dropout that we propose to ensure unbiased output and fit into our framework, and the variance bounds exhibits connection to adaptive regularization methods. By applying our framework to ReLU networks with one hidden layer, a generalization upper bound is derived with no assumptions on the parameter norms or data distribution, with $O(1/n)$ fast rate and adaptivity to geometry of data points being achieved at the same time. Wenlong Mou, Jun Gao 0004, Liwei Wang 0001 |
ICML | 1 |
| 2017 | Collect at Once, Use Effectively: Making Non-interactive Locally Private Learning PossibleabstractNon-interactive Local Differential Privacy (LDP) requires data analysts to collect data from users through noisy channel at once. In this paper, we extend the frontiers of Non-interactive LDP learning and estimation from several aspects. For learning with smooth generalized linear losses, we propose an approximate stochastic gradient oracle estimated from non-interactive LDP channel using Chebyshev expansion, which is combined with inexact gradient methods to obtain an efficient algorithm with quasi-polynomial sample complexity bound. For the high-dimensional world, we discover that under $\ell_2$-norm assumption on data points, high-dimensional sparse linear regression and mean estimation can be achieved with logarithmic dependence on dimension, using random projection and approximate recovery. We also extend our methods to Kernel Ridge Regression. Our work is the first one that makes learning and estimation possible for a broad range of learning tasks under non-interactive LDP model. Kai Zheng 0007, Wenlong Mou, Liwei Wang 0001 |
ICML | 2 |
| 2017 | Differentially Private Clustering in High-Dimensional Euclidean SpacesabstractWe study the problem of clustering sensitive data while preserving the privacy of individuals represented in the dataset, which has broad applications in practical machine learning and data analysis tasks. Although the problem has been widely studied in the context of low-dimensional, discrete spaces, much remains unknown concerning private clustering in high-dimensional Euclidean spaces $\mathbb{R}^d$. In this work, we give differentially private and efficient algorithms achieving strong guarantees for $k$-means and $k$-median clustering when $d=\Omega(\mathsf{polylog}(n))$. Our algorithm achieves clustering loss at most $\log^3(n)\mathsf{OPT}+\mathsf{poly}(\log n,d,k)$, advancing the state-of-the-art result of $\sqrt{d}\mathsf{OPT}+\mathsf{poly}(\log n,d^d,k^d)$. We also study the case where the data points are $s$-sparse and show that the clustering loss can scale logarithmically with $d$, i.e., $\log^3(n)\mathsf{OPT}+\mathsf{poly}(\log n,\log d,k,s)$. Experiments on both synthetic and real datasets verify the effectiveness of the proposed method. Maria-Florina Balcan, Travis Dick, Yingyu Liang, Wenlong Mou, Hongyang Zhang 0001 |
ICML | 4 |
| 2017 | Efficient Private ERM for Smooth ObjectivesabstractIn this paper, we consider efficient differentially private empirical risk minimization from the viewpoint of optimization algorithms. For strongly convex and smooth objectives, we prove that gradient descent with output perturbation not only achieves nearly optimal utility, but also significantly improves the running time of previous state-of-the-art private optimization algorithms, for both $\epsilon$-DP and $(\epsilon, \delta)$-DP. For non-convex but smooth objectives, we propose an RRPSGD (Random Round Private Stochastic Gradient Descent) algorithm, which provably converges to a stationary point with privacy guarantee. Besides the expected utility bounds, we also provide guarantees in high probability form. Experiments demonstrate that our algorithm consistently outperforms existing method in both utility and running time. Kai Zheng 0007, Wenlong Mou, Liwei Wang 0001 |
IJCAI | 3 |