Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Adrian Rechy Romero
dblp:174/1892
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Robot navigation and mapping · 91% Autonomous driving · 9% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
localization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Map-Aware Particle Filter for Localization · ICRA 2018 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › localization › map-based localization
map matching |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Map-Aware Particle Filter for Localization · ICRA 2018 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › localization › probabilistic localization
monte carlo localization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Map-Aware Particle Filter for Localization · ICRA 2018 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving
perception |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Map-Aware Particle Filter for Localization · ICRA 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
particle filter · 0.3occupancy grid · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Map-Aware Particle Filter for LocalizationabstractThis work presents a method to improve vehicle localization by using the information from a prior occupancy grid to bound the possible poses. The method, named Map-Aware Particle Filter, uses a nonlinear approach to map-matching that can be integrated into a particle filter framework for localization. Each particle is re-weighted based on the validity of its current position in the map. In addition, we buffer the trajectory followed by the vehicle and then append it to each particle's pose. We then quantify the overlap between the trajectory and the map's free space. This serves as a measure of each particle's validity given the trajectory and the shape of the map. We evaluated the method by performing experiments with different types of localization sensors: First, (i) we significantly reduced the drift inherent to dead reckoning. By only using wheel odometry and map information we achieved loop closure over a distance of approximately 3 km. We also (ii) increased the accuracy of GPS localization. Finally, (iii) we fused a fragile 2D LiDAR localization with the map information. The resulting system had a higher robustness and managed to close the loop in an outdated map where it had failed before. Adrian Rechy Romero, Paulo Vinicius Koerich Borges, Andreas Pfrunder, Alberto Elfes |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2017 | Real-time autonomous ground vehicle navigation in heterogeneous environments using a 3D LiDARabstractThe ability to drive autonomously in heterogeneous environments without GPS, pattern identification (e.g. road following), or artificial landmarks is key to field robotics. To address this challenge, we present a complete waypoint navigation framework for unmanned ground vehicles. A Velodyne PUCK VLP-16 LiDAR and an IMU are mounted on an autonomous, full size utility vehicle and used for localization within a previously created base map. We redesign a six degrees of freedom LiDAR SLAM algorithm to achieve 3D localization on the base map, as well as real-time vehicle navigation. We fuse the low-frequency, high precision SLAM updates with high-frequency, odometric local state estimates from the vehicle. The navigation costmap consists of a 2D occupancy grid which is computed from the 3D base map. Relying on this setup, the vehicle is capable of navigating through a complex site completely autonomously. The test site has densely and sparsely built areas, bushland, industrial activities, pedestrians, and other manned or unmanned vehicles. Extensive testing was done using both current and outdated base maps for comparisons, and a high precision RTK-GPS was used for ground truth. So far, more than 60 km of completely autonomous driving has been performed without a single system or navigation failure. Andreas Pfrunder, Paulo Vinicius Koerich Borges, Adrian Rechy Romero, Gavin Catt, Alberto Elfes |
IROS | 3 |