Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Muhammad El-Haliby
dblp:174/1961
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Empirical software engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Empirical software engineering › mining software repositories › app store mining
app review analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Ensemble Methods for App Review Classification: An Approach for Software Evolution (N) · ASE 2015 |
Empirical software engineering › qualitative research
content analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Ensemble Methods for App Review Classification: An Approach for Software Evolution (N) · ASE 2015 |
Empirical software engineering
mining software repositories |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Ensemble Methods for App Review Classification: An Approach for Software Evolution (N) · ASE 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
machine learning classification · 0.2ensemble learning · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | Ensemble Methods for App Review Classification: An Approach for Software Evolution (N)abstractApp marketplaces are distribution platforms for mobile applications that serve as a communication channel between users and developers. These platforms allow users to write reviews about downloaded apps. Recent studies found that such reviews include information that is useful for software evolution. However, the manual analysis of a large amount of user reviews is a tedious and time consuming task. In this work we propose a taxonomy for classifying app reviews into categories relevant for software evolution. Additionally, we describe an experiment that investigates the performance of individual machine learning algorithms and its ensembles for automatically classifying the app reviews. We evaluated the performance of the machine learning techniques on 4550 reviews that were systematically labeled using content analysis methods. Overall, the ensembles had a better performance than the individual classifiers, with an average precision of 0.74 and 0.59 recall. Emitza Guzman, Muhammad El-Haliby, Bernd Brügge |
ASE | 2 |