Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Muhammad El-Haliby

dblp:174/1961 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Empirical software engineering › mining software repositories › app store mining
app review analysis
0.212015
Ensemble Methods for App Review Classification: An Approach for Software Evolution (N) · ASE 2015
Empirical software engineering › qualitative research
content analysis
0.212015
Ensemble Methods for App Review Classification: An Approach for Software Evolution (N) · ASE 2015
Empirical software engineering
mining software repositories
0.212015
Ensemble Methods for App Review Classification: An Approach for Software Evolution (N) · ASE 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

machine learning classification · 0.2ensemble learning · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Ensemble Methods for App Review Classification: An Approach for Software Evolution (N)
abstract
App marketplaces are distribution platforms for mobile applications that serve as a communication channel between users and developers. These platforms allow users to write reviews about downloaded apps. Recent studies found that such reviews include information that is useful for software evolution. However, the manual analysis of a large amount of user reviews is a tedious and time consuming task. In this work we propose a taxonomy for classifying app reviews into categories relevant for software evolution. Additionally, we describe an experiment that investigates the performance of individual machine learning algorithms and its ensembles for automatically classifying the app reviews. We evaluated the performance of the machine learning techniques on 4550 reviews that were systematically labeled using content analysis methods. Overall, the ensembles had a better performance than the individual classifiers, with an average precision of 0.74 and 0.59 recall.
Emitza Guzman, Muhammad El-Haliby, Bernd Brügge
ASE2