Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Élise Jeanneau

dblp:174/2116 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Distributed computing theory · 91% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed computing theory
consensus
0.312017
Solving k-Set Agreement Using Failure Detectors in Unknown Dynamic Networks · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2017
Distributed computing theory › fault tolerance
failure detectors
0.312017
Solving k-Set Agreement Using Failure Detectors in Unknown Dynamic Networks · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2017
Distributed computing theory › consensus
k-set agreement
0.312017
Solving k-Set Agreement Using Failure Detectors in Unknown Dynamic Networks · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2017
Graph algorithms and graph theory
temporal graph
0.112017
Solving k-Set Agreement Using Failure Detectors in Unknown Dynamic Networks · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

failure detector abstraction · 0.3connectivity assumptions · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 SkyData: Rise of the Data How Can the Intelligent and Autonomous Data Paradigm Become Real?
abstract
Best Poster Award.
Etienne Mauffret, Élise Jeanneau, Eddy Caron
CLOSER2
2017 Solving k-Set Agreement Using Failure Detectors in Unknown Dynamic Networks
abstract
The failure detector abstraction has been used to solve agreement problems in asynchronous systems prone to crash failures, but so far it has mostly been used in static and complete networks. This paper aims to adapt existing failure detectors in order to solve agreement problems in unknown, dynamic systems. We are specifically interested in the k-set agreement problem. The problem of k-set agreement is a generalization of consensus where processes can decide up to k different values. Although some solutions to this problem have been proposed in dynamic networks, they rely on communication synchrony or make strong assumptions on the number of process failures. In this paper we consider unknown dynamic systems modeled using the formalism of Time-Varying Graphs, and extend the definition of the existing$\Pi \Sigma _{x,y}$failure detector to obtain the$\Pi \Sigma _{\bot, x,y}$failure detector, which is sufficient to solve k-set agreement in our model. We then provide an implementation of this new failure detector using connectivity and message pattern assumptions. Finally, we present an algorithm using$\Pi \Sigma _{\bot, x,y}$to solve k-set agreement.
Élise Jeanneau, Thibault Rieutord, Luciana Arantes, Pierre Sens 0001
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst.1
2015 A Failure Detector for k-Set Agreement in Dynamic Systems
abstract
The k-set agreement problem is a generalization of the consensus problem where processes can decide up to k different values. Very few papers have tackled this problem in dynamic networks, and to the best of our knowledge, every algorithm proposed so far for k-set agreement in dynamic networks assumed synchronous communications or made strong failure pattern assumptions. Exploiting the formalism of the Time-Varying Graph model, this paper proposes a new quorum-based failure detector for solving k-set agreement in dynamic networks with asynchronous communications. We present two algorithms that implement this new failure detector using graph connectivity and message pattern assumptions. We also provide an algorithm for solving k-set agreement using our new failure detector.
Élise Jeanneau, Thibault Rieutord, Luciana Arantes, Pierre Sens 0001
NCA1