Optimizing computing circuits such as multipliers and adders is a fundamental challenge in modern integrated circuit design. Recent efforts propose formulating this optimization problem as a reinforcement learning (RL) proxy task, offering a promising approach to search high-speed and area-efficient circuit design solutions. However, we show that the RL-based formulation (proxy task) converges to a local optimal design solution (original task) due to the deceptive reward signals and incrementally localized actions in the RL-based formulation. To address this challenge, we propose a novel model-based circuit genetic evolution (MUTE) framework, which reformulates the problem as a genetic evolution process by proposing a grid-based genetic representation of design solutions. This novel formulation avoids misleading rewards by evaluating and improving generated solutions using the true objective value rather than proxy rewards. To promote globally diverse exploration, MUTE proposes a multi-granularity genetic crossover operator that recombines design substructures at varying column ranges between two grid-based genetic solutions. To the best of our knowledge, MUTE is the first to reformulate the problem as a circuit genetic evolution process, which enables effectively searching for global optimal design solutions. We evaluate MUTE on several fundamental computing circuits, including multipliers, adders, and multiply-accumulate circuits. Experiments on these circuits demonstrate that MUTE significantly Pareto-dominates state-of-the-art approaches in terms of both area and delay. Moreover, experiments demonstrate that circuits designed by MUTE well generalize to large-scale computation-intensive circuits as well.

Tree-search-based reasoning methods have significantly enhanced the reasoning capability of large language models (LLMs) by facilitating the exploration of multiple intermediate reasoning steps, i.e., thoughts. However, these methods suffer from substantial inference latency, as they have to generate numerous reasoning thoughts, severely limiting LLM applicability. To address this challenge, we propose a novel Speculative Search (SpecSearch) framework that significantly accelerates LLM reasoning by optimizing thought generation. Specifically, SpecSearch utilizes a small model to strategically collaborate with a large model at both thought and token levels, efficiently generating high-quality reasoning thoughts. The major pillar of SpecSearch is a novel quality-preserving rejection mechanism, which effectively filters out thoughts whose quality falls below that of the large model's outputs. Moreover, we show that SpecSearch preserves comparable reasoning quality to the large model. Experiments on both the Qwen and Llama models demonstrate that SpecSearch significantly outperforms state-of-the-art approaches, achieving up to 2.12$\times$ speedup with comparable reasoning quality.

Arithmetic circuit optimization remains a fundamental challenge in modern integrated circuit design. Recent advances have cast this problem within the Learning to Optimize (L2O) paradigm, where intelligent agents autonomously explore high-performance design spaces with encouraging results. However, existing approaches predominantly target coarse-grained architectural configurations, while the crucial interconnect optimization stage is often relegated to oversimplified proxy models or a heuristic approach. This disconnect undermines design quality, leading to suboptimal solutions in the circuit topology search space. To bridge this gap, we present **Arith-DAS**, a **D**ifferentiable **A**rchitecture **S**earch framework for **Arith**metic circuits. To the best of our knowledge, **Arith-DAS** is the first to formulate interconnect optimization within arithmetic circuits as a differentiable edge prediction problem over a multi-relational directed acyclic graph, enabling fine-grained, proxy-free optimization at the interconnection level. We evaluate **Arith-DAS** on a suite of representative arithmetic circuits, including multipliers and multiply-accumulate units. Experiments show substantial improvements over state-of-the-art L2O and conventional methods, achieving up to $\textbf{27.05}$% gain in hypervolume of area-delay Pareto front, a standard metric for evaluating multi-objective optimization performance. Moreover, integrating our optimized arithmetic units into large-scale AI accelerators yields up to $\textbf{6.59}$% delay reduction, demonstrating both scalability and real-world applicability.

Multiplier design—which aims to explore a large combinatorial design space to simultaneously optimize multiple conflicting objectives—is a fundamental problem in the integrated circuits industry. Although traditional approaches tackle the multi-objective multiplier optimization problem by manually designed heuristics, reinforcement learning (RL) offers a promising approach to discover high-speed and area-efficient multipliers. However, the existing RL-based methods struggle to find Pareto-optimal circuit designs for all possible preferences, i.e., weights over objectives, in a sample-efficient manner. To address this challenge, we propose a novel hierarchical adaptive (HAVE) multi-task reinforcement learning framework. The hierarchical framework consists of a meta-agent to generate diverse multiplier preferences, and an adaptive multi-task agent to collaboratively optimize multipliers conditioned on the dynamic preferences given by the meta-agent. To the best of our knowledge, HAVE is the first to well approximate Pareto-optimal circuit designs for the entire preference space with high sample efficiency. Experiments on multipliers across a wide range of input widths demonstrate that HAVE significantly Pareto-dominates state-of-the-art approaches, achieving up to 28% larger hypervolume. Moreover, experiments demonstrate that multipliers designed by HAVE can well generalize to large-scale computation-intensive circuits.