EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Pradeep Anand Ravindranath
dblp:174/8914
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation › binding site prediction
ligand binding site prediction |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | AutoSite: an automated approach for pseudo-ligands prediction - from ligand-binding sites identification to predicting key ligand atoms · Bioinform. 2016 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural bioinformatics
protein-ligand binding |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | AutoSite: an automated approach for pseudo-ligands prediction - from ligand-binding sites identification to predicting key ligand atoms · Bioinform. 2016 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › drug discovery
drug design |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | AutoSite: an automated approach for pseudo-ligands prediction - from ligand-binding sites identification to predicting key ligand atoms · Bioinform. 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
feature point extraction · 0.2clustering · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | AutoSite: an automated approach for pseudo-ligands prediction - from ligand-binding sites identification to predicting key ligand atomsabstractMOTIVATION: The identification of ligand-binding sites from a protein structure facilitates computational drug design and optimization, and protein function assignment. We introduce AutoSite: an efficient software tool for identifying ligand-binding sites and predicting pseudo ligand corresponding to each binding site identified. Binding sites are reported as clusters of 3D points called fills in which every point is labelled as hydrophobic or as hydrogen bond donor or acceptor. From these fills AutoSite derives feature points: a set of putative positions of hydrophobic-, and hydrogen-bond forming ligand atoms. RESULTS: We show that AutoSite identifies ligand-binding sites with higher accuracy than other leading methods, and produces fills that better matches the ligand shape and properties, than the fills obtained with a software program with similar capabilities, AutoLigand In addition, we demonstrate that for the Astex Diverse Set, the feature points identify 79% of hydrophobic ligand atoms, and 81% and 62% of the hydrogen acceptor and donor hydrogen ligand atoms interacting with the receptor, and predict 81.2% of water molecules mediating interactions between ligand and receptor. Finally, we illustrate potential uses of the predicted feature points in the context of lead optimization in drug discovery projects. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: http://adfr.scripps.edu/AutoDockFR/autosite.html CONTACT: [email protected] information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Pradeep Anand Ravindranath, Michel F. Sanner |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2015 | AutoDockFR: Advances in Protein-Ligand Docking with Explicitly Specified Binding Site FlexibilityabstractAutomated docking of drug-like molecules into receptors is an essential tool in structure-based drug design. While modeling receptor flexibility is important for correctly predicting ligand binding, it still remains challenging. This work focuses on an approach in which receptor flexibility is modeled by explicitly specifying a set of receptor side-chains a-priori. The challenges of this approach include the: 1) exponential growth of the search space, demanding more efficient search methods; and 2) increased number of false positives, calling for scoring functions tailored for flexible receptor docking. We present AutoDockFR-AutoDock for Flexible Receptors (ADFR), a new docking engine based on the AutoDock4 scoring function, which addresses the aforementioned challenges with a new Genetic Algorithm (GA) and customized scoring function. We validate ADFR using the Astex Diverse Set, demonstrating an increase in efficiency and reliability of its GA over the one implemented in AutoDock4. We demonstrate greatly increased success rates when cross-docking ligands into apo receptors that require side-chain conformational changes for ligand binding. These cross-docking experiments are based on two datasets: 1) SEQ17 -a receptor diversity set containing 17 pairs of apo-holo structures; and 2) CDK2 -a ligand diversity set composed of one CDK2 apo structure and 52 known bound inhibitors. We show that, when cross-docking ligands into the apo conformation of the receptors with up to 14 flexible side-chains, ADFR reports more correctly cross-docked ligands than AutoDock Vina on both datasets with solutions found for 70.6% vs. 35.3% systems on SEQ17, and 76.9% vs. 61.5% on CDK2. ADFR also outperforms AutoDock Vina in number of top ranking solutions on both datasets. Furthermore, we show that correctly docked CDK2 complexes re-create on average 79.8% of all pairwise atomic interactions between the ligand and moving receptor atoms in the holo complexes. Finally, we show that down-weighting the receptor internal energy improves the ranking of correctly docked poses and that runtime for AutoDockFR scales linearly when side-chain flexibility is added. Pradeep Anand Ravindranath, Stefano Forli, David S. Goodsell, Arthur J. Olson, Michel F. Sanner |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 1 |