Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kevin Angstadt
dblp:174/9125
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
4as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-0104-5257ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 6 · 4 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 4 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
6 papers |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 46% Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs · 20% Electronic design automation · 10% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
3 papers |
Debugging and program repair · 51% Programming languages and type systems · 34% Compilers and program optimization · 15% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs
automata processing |
0.7 | 2 | 2018 | ASPEN: A Scalable In-SRAM Architecture for Pushdown Automata · MICRO 2018 Characterizing and Mitigating Output Reporting Bottlenecks in Spatial Automata Processing Architectures · HPCA 2018 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › pattern matching accelerator
automata processor |
0.6 | 2 | 2019 | Debugging Support for Pattern-Matching Languages and Accelerators · ASPLOS 2019 RAPID Programming of Pattern-Recognition Processors · ASPLOS 2016 |
Electronic design automation
high-level synthesis |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Accelerating Legacy String Kernels via Bounded Automata Learning · ASPLOS 2020 |
Debugging and program repair
fault localization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Debugging Support for Pattern-Matching Languages and Accelerators · ASPLOS 2019 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
interactive debugging |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Debugging Support for Pattern-Matching Languages and Accelerators · ASPLOS 2019 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
pattern matching accelerator |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Portable Programming with RAPID · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2019 |
High-performance computing › performance engineering
performance portability |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Portable Programming with RAPID · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2019 |
Memory systems
in-memory computing |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | ASPEN: A Scalable In-SRAM Architecture for Pushdown Automata · MICRO 2018 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
spatial architecture |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Characterizing and Mitigating Output Reporting Bottlenecks in Spatial Automata Processing Architectures · HPCA 2018 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
workload characterization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Characterizing and Mitigating Output Reporting Bottlenecks in Spatial Automata Processing Architectures · HPCA 2018 |
Programming languages and type systems
domain-specific languages |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | RAPID Programming of Pattern-Recognition Processors · ASPLOS 2016 |
Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs
FPGA accelerator |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Accelerating Legacy String Kernels via Bounded Automata Learning · ASPLOS 2020 |
Data mining › pattern mining › tree mining
frequent subtree mining |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | ASPEN: A Scalable In-SRAM Architecture for Pushdown Automata · MICRO 2018 |
Data mining
pattern mining |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Characterizing and Mitigating Output Reporting Bottlenecks in Spatial Automata Processing Architectures · HPCA 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variable inspection · 0.8step-through debugging · 0.8imperative-declarative programming model · 0.8human study · 0.8automata conversion · 0.8output compression · 0.7architectural simulation · 0.7finite automata compilation · 0.5high-level synthesis · 0.4bounded automata learning · 0.4tessellation · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | START: A Framework for Trusted and Resilient Autonomous Vehicles (Practical Experience Report)abstractFrom delivering groceries and vital medical supplies to driving trucks and passenger vehicles, society is becoming increasingly reliant on autonomous vehicles (AVs), It is therefore vital that these systems be resilient to adversarial actions, perform mission-critical functions despite known and unknown vulnerabilities, and protect and repair themselves during or after operational failures and cyber-attacks. While techniques have been proposed to address individual aspects of software resilience, vulnerability assessment, automated repair, and invariant detection, there is no approach that provides end-to-end trusted and resilient mission operation and repair on AVs. In this paper, we describe our experience of building START,11Software Techniques for Automated Resilience and Trust a framework that provides increased resilience, accurate vul-nerability assessment, and trustworthy post-repair operation in autonomous vehicles. We combine techniques from binary analysis and rewriting, runtime monitoring and verification, auto-mated program repair, and invariant detection that cooperatively detect and eliminate a swath of software security vulnerabilities in cyberphysical systems. We evaluate our framework using an autonomous vehicle simulation platform, demonstrating its holistic applicability to AVs. Kevin Leach, Christopher Steven Timperley, Kevin Angstadt, Anh Nguyen-Tuong, Jason Hiser, Aaron Paulos, Partha P. Pal, Patrick Hurley, Carl Thomas, Jack W. Davidson, Stephanie Forrest, Claire Le Goues, Westley Weimer |
ISSRE | 3 |
| 2021 | The Early Bird Gets the Worm: Major Retention in CS3abstractEnrollments continue to rise in Computer Science courses, yet fostering inclusive climates and retaining diverse student bodies remain key challenges. Gender ratios remain heavily skewed and many demographics are severely underrepresented. Numerous studies investigate student retention in introductory courses, but few focus on later stages of the CS retention "pipeline", where techniques and findings from earlier courses may no longer apply. Fee Lia Christoph, Westley Weimer, Kevin Angstadt |
ITiCSE (1) | 3 |
| 2020 | Accelerating Legacy String Kernels via Bounded Automata LearningabstractThe adoption of hardware accelerators, such as FPGAs, into general-purpose computation pipelines continues to rise, but programming models for these devices lag far behind their CPU counterparts. Legacy programs must often be rewritten at very low levels of abstraction, requiring intimate knowledge of the target accelerator architecture. While techniques such as high-level synthesis can help port some legacy software, many programs perform poorly without manual, architecture-specific optimization. Kevin Angstadt, Jean-Baptiste Jeannin, Westley Weimer |
ASPLOS | 1 |
| 2019 | Debugging Support for Pattern-Matching Languages and AcceleratorsabstractPrograms written for hardware accelerators can often be difficult to debug. Without adequate tool support, program maintenance tasks such as fault localization and debugging can be particularly challenging. In this work, we focus on supporting hardware that is specialized for finite automata processing, a computational paradigm that has accelerated pattern-matching applications across a diverse set of problem domains. While commodity hardware enables high-throughput data analysis, direct interactive debugging (e.g., single-stepping) is not currently supported. We propose a debugging approach for existing commodity hardware that supports step-through debugging and variable inspection of user-written automata processing programs. We focus on programs written in RAPID, a domain-specific language for pattern-matching applications. We develop a prototype of our approach for both Xilinx FPGAs and Micron's Automata Processor that supports simultaneous high-speed processing of data and interactive debugging without requiring modifications to the underlying hardware. Our empirical evaluation demonstrates low clock overheads for our approach across thirteen applications in the ANMLZoo automata processing benchmark suite on FPGAs. Additionally, we evaluate our technique through a human study involving over 60 participants and 20 buggy segments of code. Our generated debugging information increases fault localization accuracy by 22%, or 10 percentage points, in a statistically significant manner (p=0.013). Matthew Casias, Kevin Angstadt, Tommy Tracy II, Kevin Skadron, Westley Weimer |
ASPLOS | 2 |
| 2019 | Portable Programming with RAPIDabstractAs the hardware found within data centers becomes more heterogeneous, it is important to allow for efficient execution of algorithms across architectures. We present RAPID, a high-level programming language and combined imperative and declarative model for functionally- and performance-portable execution of sequential pattern-matching applications across CPUs, GPUs, Field-Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs), and Micron's D480 AP. RAPID is clear, maintainable, concise, and efficient both at compile and run time. Language features, such as code abstraction and parallel control structures, map well to pattern-matching problems, providing clarity and maintainability. For generation of efficient runtime code, we present algorithms to convert RAPID programs into finite automata. Our empirical evaluation of applications in the ANMLZoo benchmark suite demonstrates that the automata processing paradigm provides an abstraction that is portable across architectures. We evaluate RAPID programs against custom, baseline implementations previously demonstrated to be significantly accelerated. We also find that RAPID programs are much shorter in length, are expressible at a higher level of abstraction than their handcrafted counterparts, and yield generated code that is often more compact. Kevin Angstadt, Jack Wadden, Westley Weimer, Kevin Skadron |
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. | 1 |
| 2018 | Characterizing and Mitigating Output Reporting Bottlenecks in Spatial Automata Processing ArchitecturesabstractAutomata processing has seen a resurgence in importance due to its usefulness for pattern matching and pattern mining of "big data." While large-scale automata processing is known to bottleneck von Neumann processors due to unpredictable memory accesses, spatial architectures excel at automata processing. Spatial architectures can implement automata graphs by wiring together automata states in reconfigurable arrays, allowing parallel automata state computation, and point-to-point state transitions on-chip. However, spatial automata processing architectures can suffer from output constraints (up to 255x in commercial systems!) due to the physical placement of states, output processing architecture design, I/O resources, and the massively parallel nature of the architecture. To understand this bottleneck, we conduct the first known characterization of output requirements of a realistic set of automata processing benchmarks. We find that most benchmarks report fairly frequently, but that few states report at any one time. This observation motivates new output compression schemes and reporting architectures. We evaluate the benefit of one purely software automata transformation and show that output reporting costs can be greatly reduced (improving performance by up to 40% without hardware modification. We then explore bottlenecks in the reporting architecture of a commercial spatial automata processor and propose a new architecture that improves performance by up to 5.1x. Jack Wadden, Kevin Angstadt, Kevin Skadron |
HPCA | 2 |
| 2018 | ASPEN: A Scalable In-SRAM Architecture for Pushdown AutomataabstractMany applications process some form of tree-structured or recursively-nested data, such as parsing XML or JSON web content as well as various data mining tasks. Typical CPU processing solutions are hindered by branch misprediction penalties while attempting to reconstruct nested structures and also by irregular memory access patterns. Recent work has demonstrated improved performance for many data processing applications through memory-centric automata processing engines. Unfortunately, these architectures do not support a computational model rich enough for tasks such as XML parsing. In this paper, we present ASPEN, a general-purpose, scalable, and reconfigurable memory-centric architecture for processing of tree-like data. We take inspiration from previous automata processing architectures, but support the richer deterministic pushdown automata computational model. We propose a custom datapath capable of performing the state matching, stack manipulation, and transition routing operations of pushdown automata, all efficiently stored and computed in memory arrays. Further, we present compilation algorithms for transforming large classes of existing grammars to pushdown automata executable on ASPEN, and demonstrate their effectiveness on four different languages: Cool (object oriented programming), DOT (graph visualization), JSON, and XML. Finally, we present an empirical evaluation of two application scenarios for ASPEN: XML parsing, and frequent subtree mining. The proposed architecture achieves an average 704.5 ns per KB parsing XML compared to 9983 ns per KB in a state-of-the-art XML parser across 23 benchmarks. We also demonstrate a 37.2x and 6x better end-to-end speedup over CPU and GPU implementations of subtree mining. Kevin Angstadt, Arun Subramaniyan 0001, Elaheh Sadredini, Reza Rahimi, Kevin Skadron, Westley Weimer, Reetuparna Das |
MICRO | 1 |
| 2016 | RAPID Programming of Pattern-Recognition ProcessorsabstractWe present RAPID, a high-level programming language and combined imperative and declarative model for programming pattern-recognition processors, such as Micron's Automata Processor (AP). The AP is a novel, non-Von Neumann architecture for direct execution of non-deterministic finite automata (NFAs), and has been demonstrated to provide substantial speedup for a variety of data-processing applications. RAPID is clear, maintainable, concise, and efficient both at compile and run time. Language features, such as code abstraction and parallel control structures, map well to pattern-matching problems, providing clarity and maintainability. For generation of efficient runtime code, we present algorithms to convert RAPID programs into finite automata. Further, we introduce a tessellation technique for configuring the AP, which significantly reduces compile time, increases programmer productivity, and improves maintainability. We evaluate five RAPID programs against custom, baseline implementations previously demonstrated to be significantly accelerated by the AP. We find that RAPID programs are much shorter in length, are expressible at a higher level of abstraction than their handcrafted counterparts, and yield generated code that is often more compact. In addition, our tessellation technique for configuring the AP has comparable device utilization to, and results in compilation that is up to four orders of magnitude faster than, current solutions. Kevin Angstadt, Westley Weimer, Kevin Skadron |
ASPLOS | 1 |