EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Lucy Li
dblp:174/9518
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 3 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
3 papers |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 45% Authentication and access control · 29% Privacy and data protection · 26% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Indexing and storage engines · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Privacy and data protection › data confidentiality
encrypted storage |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Pancake: Frequency Smoothing for Encrypted Data Stores · USENIX Security Symposium 2020 |
Authentication and access control › password security
compromised credential checking |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Protocols for Checking Compromised Credentials · CCS 2019 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › encryption
deterministic encryption |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | The Local Forking Lemma and Its Application to Deterministic Encryption · ASIACRYPT (3) 2019 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
forking lemma |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | The Local Forking Lemma and Its Application to Deterministic Encryption · ASIACRYPT (3) 2019 |
Authentication and access control
password authentication |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Protocols for Checking Compromised Credentials · CCS 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
frequency smoothing · 0.9threat modeling · 0.4empirical leakage analysis · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Understanding Research Related to Designing for Children's Privacy and Security: A Document AnalysisabstractMany children are growing up in a “digital-by-default” world, where technologies mediate many of their interactions. There is emerging consensus that those who design technology must support children's privacy and security. However, privacy and security are complex concepts that are challenging to design for, and centering the interests of children is similarly difficult. Through a document analysis of 90 HCI publications, we examine what problems and solutions designing for children's privacy and security addresses and how this research engages with children. Applying Solove's privacy taxonomy, we find that research addresses a range of problems related to information collection, processing, dissemination, and invasion at the organizational, system, and individual levels. Children's participation in this research is largely limited to providing feedback rather than helping to guide the research itself. Based on these findings, we offer recommendations for designers to sharpen their privacy and security contributions and center children in their work. Priya Kumar 0001, Fiona O'Connell, Lucy Li, Virginia Byrne, Marshini Chetty, Tamara L. Clegg, Jessica Vitak |
IDC | 3 |
| 2020 | Pancake: Frequency Smoothing for Encrypted Data Stores
Paul Grubbs, Anurag Khandelwal, Marie-Sarah Lacharité, Lloyd Brown, Lucy Li, Rachit Agarwal 0001, Thomas Ristenpart |
USENIX Security Symposium | 5 |
| 2019 | The Local Forking Lemma and Its Application to Deterministic Encryption
Mihir Bellare, Wei Dai 0011, Lucy Li |
ASIACRYPT (3) | 3 |
| 2019 | Protocols for Checking Compromised CredentialsabstractTo prevent credential stuffing attacks, industry best practice now proactively checks if user credentials are present in known data breaches. Recently, some web services, such as HaveIBeenPwned (HIBP) and Google Password Checkup (GPC), have started providing APIs to check for breached passwords. We refer to such services as compromised credential checking (C3) services. We give the first formal description of C3 services, detailing different settings and operational requirements, and we give relevant threat models. One key security requirement is the secrecy of a user's passwords that are being checked. Current widely deployed C3 services have the user share a small prefix of a hash computed over the user's password. We provide a framework for empirically analyzing the leakage of such protocols, showing that in some contexts knowing the hash prefixes leads to a 12x increase in the efficacy of remote guessing attacks. We propose two new protocols that provide stronger protection for users' passwords, implement them, and show experimentally that they remain practical to deploy. Lucy Li, Bijeeta Pal, Junade Ali, Nick Sullivan, Rahul Chatterjee 0001, Thomas Ristenpart |
CCS | 1 |