Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Santhosh Prabhu

dblp:174/9522 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Network management and operations · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Network management and operations
configuration verification
0.412020
Plankton: Scalable network configuration verification through model checking · NSDI 2020
Network management and operations › network verification
model checking
0.412020
Plankton: Scalable network configuration verification through model checking · NSDI 2020
Network management and operations
network verification
0.112020
Plankton: Scalable network configuration verification through model checking · NSDI 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

network modeling · 0.4model checking · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Plankton: Scalable network configuration verification through model checking
Santhosh Prabhu, Kuan-Yen Chou, Ali Kheradmand, Brighten Godfrey, Matthew Caesar 0001
NSDI1
2017 Predicting Network Futures with Plankton
abstract
Recent years have seen significant advancement in the field of formal network verification. Tools have been proposed for offline data plane verification, real-time data plane verification and configuration verification under arbitrary, but static sets of failures. However, due to the fundamental limitation of not treating the network as an evolving system, current verification platforms have significant constraints in terms of scope. In real-world networks, correctness policies may be violated only through a particular combination of environment events and protocol actions, possibly in a non-deterministic sequence. Moreover, correctness specifications themselves may often correlate multiple data plane states, particularly when dynamic data plane elements are present. Tools in existence today are not capable of reasoning about all the possible network events, and all the subsequent execution paths that are enabled by those events. We propose Plankton, a verification platform for identifying undesirable evolutions of networks. By combining symbolic modeling of data plane and control plane with explicit state exploration, Plankton performs a goal-directed search on a finite-state transition system that captures the behavior of the network as well as the various events that can influence it. In this way, Plankton can automatically find policy violations that can occur due to a sequence of network events, starting from the current state. Initial experiments have successfully predicted scenarios like BGP Wedgies.
Santhosh Prabhu, Ali Kheradmand, Brighten Godfrey, Matthew Caesar 0001
APNet1