Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alexandre Antunes

dblp:175/1039 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 50% Robot manipulation · 38% Motion planning and robot control · 12%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot manipulation
language-conditioned task planning
0.212016
From human instructions to robot actions: Formulation of goals, affordances and probabilistic planning · ICRA 2016
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
task planning
0.212016
From human instructions to robot actions: Formulation of goals, affordances and probabilistic planning · ICRA 2016
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning › manipulation planning
affordance-based planning
0.112016
From human instructions to robot actions: Formulation of goals, affordances and probabilistic planning · ICRA 2016
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
probabilistic planning
0.112016
From human instructions to robot actions: Formulation of goals, affordances and probabilistic planning · ICRA 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semantic reasoning · 0.2probabilistic planning · 0.2affordance modeling · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 A Bi-directional Multiple Timescales LSTM Model for Grounding of Actions and Verbs
abstract
In this paper we present a neural architecture to learn a bi-directional mapping between actions and language. We implement a Multiple Timescale Long Short-Term Memory (MT-LSTM) network comprised of 7 layers with different timescale factors, to connect actions to language without explicitly learning an intermediate representation. Instead, the model self-organizes such representations at the level of a slow-varying latent layer, linking action branch and language branch at the center. We train the model in a bi-directional way, learning how to produce a sentence from a certain action sequence input and, simultaneously, how to generate an action sequence given a sentence as input. Furthermore we show this model preserves some of the generalization behaviour of Multiple Timescale Recurrent Neural Networks (MTRNN) in generating sentences and actions that were not explicitly trained. We compare this model with a number of different baseline models, confirming the importance of both the bi-directional training and the multiple timescales architecture. Finally, the network was evaluated on motor actions performed by an iCub robot and their corresponding letter-based description. The results of these experiments are presented at the end of the paper.
Alexandre Antunes, Alban Laflaquière, Tetsuya Ogata, Angelo Cangelosi
IROS1
2016 From human instructions to robot actions: Formulation of goals, affordances and probabilistic planning
abstract
This paper addresses the problem of having a robot executing motor tasks requested by a human through spoken language. Verbal instructions do not typically have a one-to-one mapping to robot actions, due to various reasons: economy of spoken language, e.g., one short instruction might indeed correspond to a complex sequence of robot actions, and details about action execution might be omitted; grounding, e.g., some actions might need to be added or adapted due to environmental contingencies; embodiment, e.g., a robot might have different means than the human ones to obtain the goals that the instruction refers to. We propose a general cognitive architecture to deal with these issues, based on three steps: i) language-based semantic reasoning on the instruction (high-level), ii) formulation of goals in robot symbols and probabilistic planning to achieve them (mid-level), iii) action execution (low-level). The description of the mid-level is the main focus of this paper. The robot plans are adapted to the current scenario, perceived in real-time and continuously updated, taking in consideration the robot capabilities, modeled through the concept of affordances: this allows for flexibility and creativity in the task execution. We showcase the performance of the proposed architecture with real world experiments using the iCub humanoid robot, also in the presence of unexpected events and action failures.
Alexandre Antunes, Lorenzo Jamone, Giovanni Saponaro, Alexandre Bernardino, Rodrigo M. M. Ventura
ICRA1