Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yariv Aizenbud

dblp:175/1450 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Representation and self-supervised learning · 50% Learning theory · 25% 3D vision · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision
geometric estimation
0.912025
Estimation of Local Geometric Structure on Manifolds from Noisy Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction › manifold learning
manifold fitting
0.912025
Estimation of Local Geometric Structure on Manifolds from Noisy Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
manifold learning
0.912025
Estimation of Local Geometric Structure on Manifolds from Noisy Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation
nonparametric estimation
0.912025
Estimation of Local Geometric Structure on Manifolds from Noisy Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

local polynomial estimation · 0.9grassmannian analysis · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Estimation of Local Geometric Structure on Manifolds from Noisy Data
abstract
A common observation in data-driven applications is that high-dimensional data have a low intrinsic dimension, at least locally. In this work, we consider the problem of point estimation for manifold-valued data. Namely, given a finite set of noisy samples of $\mathcal{M}$, a $d$ dimensional submanifold of $\mathbb{R}^D$, and a point $r$ near the manifold we aim to project $r$ onto the manifold. Assuming that the data was sampled uniformly from a tubular neighborhood of a $k$-times smooth boundaryless and compact manifold, we present an algorithm that takes $r$ from this neighborhood and outputs $\hat p_n\in \mathbb{R}^D$, and $\widehat{T_{\hat p_n}\mathcal{M}}$ an element in the Grassmannian $Gr(d, D)$. We prove that as the number of samples $n\to\infty$, the point $\hat p_n$ converges to $\mathbf{p}\in \mathcal{M}$, the projection of $r$ onto $\mathcal{M}$, and $\widehat{T_{\hat p_n}\mathcal{M}}$ converges to $T_{\mathbf{p}}\mathcal{M}$ (the tangent space at that point) with high probability. Furthermore, we show that $\hat p_n$ approaches the manifold with an asymptotic rate of $n^{-\frac{k}{2k + d}}$, and that $\hat p_n, \widehat{T_{\hat p_n}\mathcal{M}}$ approach $\mathbf{p}$ and $T_{\mathbf{p}}\mathcal{M}$ correspondingly with asymptotic rates of $n^{-\frac{k-1}{2k + d}}$. %While we These rates coincide with the optimal rates for the estimation of function derivatives.
Yariv Aizenbud, Barak Sober
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2024 Transductive and Inductive Outlier Detection with Robust Autoencoders
abstract
Accurate detection of outliers is crucial for the success of numerous data analysis tasks. In this context, we propose the Probabilistic Robust AutoEncoder (PRAE) that can simultaneously remove outliers during training (transductive) and learn a mapping that can be used to detect outliers in new data (inductive). We first present the Robust AutoEncoder (RAE) objective that excludes outliers while including a subset of samples (inliers) that can be effectively reconstructed using an AutoEncoder (AE). RAE minimizes the autoencoder’s reconstruction error while incorporating as many samples as possible. This could be formulated via regularization by subtracting an $\ell_0$ norm, counting the number of selected samples from the reconstruction term. As this leads to an intractable combinatorial problem, we propose two probabilistic relaxations of RAE, which are differentiable and alleviate the need for a combinatorial search. We prove that the solution to the PRAE problem is equivalent to the solution of RAE. We then use synthetic data to demonstrate that PRAE can accurately remove outliers in various contamination levels. Finally, we show that using PRAE for outlier detection leads to state-of-the-art results for inductive and transductive outlier detection.
Ofir Lindenbaum, Yariv Aizenbud, Yuval Kluger
UAI2