Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yariv Aizenbud
dblp:175/1450
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 50% Learning theory · 25% 3D vision · 25% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision
geometric estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Estimation of Local Geometric Structure on Manifolds from Noisy Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction › manifold learning
manifold fitting |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Estimation of Local Geometric Structure on Manifolds from Noisy Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
manifold learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Estimation of Local Geometric Structure on Manifolds from Noisy Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation
nonparametric estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Estimation of Local Geometric Structure on Manifolds from Noisy Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
local polynomial estimation · 0.9grassmannian analysis · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Estimation of Local Geometric Structure on Manifolds from Noisy DataabstractA common observation in data-driven applications is that high-dimensional data have a low intrinsic dimension, at least locally. In this work, we consider the problem of point estimation for manifold-valued data. Namely, given a finite set of noisy samples of $\mathcal{M}$, a $d$ dimensional submanifold of $\mathbb{R}^D$, and a point $r$ near the manifold we aim to project $r$ onto the manifold. Assuming that the data was sampled uniformly from a tubular neighborhood of a $k$-times smooth boundaryless and compact manifold, we present an algorithm that takes $r$ from this neighborhood and outputs $\hat p_n\in \mathbb{R}^D$, and $\widehat{T_{\hat p_n}\mathcal{M}}$ an element in the Grassmannian $Gr(d, D)$. We prove that as the number of samples $n\to\infty$, the point $\hat p_n$ converges to $\mathbf{p}\in \mathcal{M}$, the projection of $r$ onto $\mathcal{M}$, and $\widehat{T_{\hat p_n}\mathcal{M}}$ converges to $T_{\mathbf{p}}\mathcal{M}$ (the tangent space at that point) with high probability. Furthermore, we show that $\hat p_n$ approaches the manifold with an asymptotic rate of $n^{-\frac{k}{2k + d}}$, and that $\hat p_n, \widehat{T_{\hat p_n}\mathcal{M}}$ approach $\mathbf{p}$ and $T_{\mathbf{p}}\mathcal{M}$ correspondingly with asymptotic rates of $n^{-\frac{k-1}{2k + d}}$. %While we These rates coincide with the optimal rates for the estimation of function derivatives. Yariv Aizenbud, Barak Sober |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2024 | Transductive and Inductive Outlier Detection with Robust AutoencodersabstractAccurate detection of outliers is crucial for the success of numerous data analysis tasks. In this context, we propose the Probabilistic Robust AutoEncoder (PRAE) that can simultaneously remove outliers during training (transductive) and learn a mapping that can be used to detect outliers in new data (inductive). We first present the Robust AutoEncoder (RAE) objective that excludes outliers while including a subset of samples (inliers) that can be effectively reconstructed using an AutoEncoder (AE). RAE minimizes the autoencoder’s reconstruction error while incorporating as many samples as possible. This could be formulated via regularization by subtracting an $\ell_0$ norm, counting the number of selected samples from the reconstruction term. As this leads to an intractable combinatorial problem, we propose two probabilistic relaxations of RAE, which are differentiable and alleviate the need for a combinatorial search. We prove that the solution to the PRAE problem is equivalent to the solution of RAE. We then use synthetic data to demonstrate that PRAE can accurately remove outliers in various contamination levels. Finally, we show that using PRAE for outlier detection leads to state-of-the-art results for inductive and transductive outlier detection. Ofir Lindenbaum, Yariv Aizenbud, Yuval Kluger |
UAI | 2 |