Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Evan Racah

dblp:175/1508 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 53% Reinforcement learning · 24% Image recognition and object detection · 20%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
High-performance computing · 50% Parallel and multicore computing · 50%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Environmental and earth informatics · 77% Computational science and engineering · 23%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning
0.412020
The LoCA Regret: A Consistent Metric to Evaluate Model-Based Behavior in Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning
0.412019
Unsupervised State Representation Learning in Atari · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
mutual information maximization
0.412019
Unsupervised State Representation Learning in Atari · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › latent representation learning
state representation learning
0.412019
Unsupervised State Representation Learning in Atari · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
unsupervised representation learning
0.412019
Unsupervised State Representation Learning in Atari · NeurIPS 2019
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object localization
bounding box prediction
0.312017
ExtremeWeather: A large-scale climate dataset for semi-supervised detection, localization, and understanding of extreme weather events · NIPS 2017
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection
0.312017
ExtremeWeather: A large-scale climate dataset for semi-supervised detection, localization, and understanding of extreme weather events · NIPS 2017
Environmental and earth informatics › climate science
climate informatics
0.312017
ExtremeWeather: A large-scale climate dataset for semi-supervised detection, localization, and understanding of extreme weather events · NIPS 2017
Parallel and multicore computing
distributed deep learning training
0.312017
Deep learning at 15PF: supervised and semi-supervised classification for scientific data · SC 2017
High-performance computing
large-scale training
0.312017
Deep learning at 15PF: supervised and semi-supervised classification for scientific data · SC 2017
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
sample efficiency
0.112020
The LoCA Regret: A Consistent Metric to Evaluate Model-Based Behavior in Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning
0.112017
ExtremeWeather: A large-scale climate dataset for semi-supervised detection, localization, and understanding of extreme weather events · NIPS 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

convolutional neural network · 1.1synchronous and asynchronous training · 0.6semi-supervised learning · 0.6local change adaptation regret · 0.4neural encoder · 0.4mutual information maximization · 0.4contrastive learning · 0.4spatiotemporal model · 0.3spatio-temporal model · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Hierarchical Model-Based Imitation Learning for Planning in Autonomous Driving
abstract
We demonstrate the first large-scale application of model-based generative adversarial imitation learning (MGAIL) to the task of dense urban self-driving. We augment standard MGAIL using a hierarchical model to enable generalization to arbitrary goal routes, and measure performance using a closed-loop evaluation framework with simulated interactive agents. We train policies from expert trajectories collected from real vehicles driving over 100,000 miles in San Francisco, and demonstrate a steerable policy that can navigate robustly even in a zero-shot setting, generalizing to synthetic scenarios with novel goals that never occurred in real-world driving. We also demonstrate the importance of mixing closed-loop MGAIL losses with open-loop behavior cloning losses, and show our best policy approaches the performance of the expert. We evaluate our imitative model in both average and challenging scenarios, and show how it can serve as a useful prior to plan successful trajectories.
Eli Bronstein, Mark Palatucci, Dominik Notz, Brandyn White, Alex Kuefler, Yiren Lu 0001, Supratik Paul, Payam Nikdel, Paul Mougin, Hongge Chen, Justin Fu, Austin Abrams, Punit Shah, Evan Racah, Benjamin Frenkel, Shimon Whiteson, Dragomir Anguelov
IROS14
2020 The LoCA Regret: A Consistent Metric to Evaluate Model-Based Behavior in Reinforcement Learning
abstract
Deep model-based Reinforcement Learning (RL) has the potential to substantially improve the sample-efficiency of deep RL. While various challenges have long held it back, a number of papers have recently come out reporting success with deep model-based methods. This is a great development, but the lack of a consistent metric to evaluate such methods makes it difficult to compare various approaches. For example, the common single-task sample-efficiency metric conflates improvements due to model-based learning with various other aspects, such as representation learning, making it difficult to assess true progress on model-based RL. To address this, we introduce an experimental setup to evaluate model-based behavior of RL methods, inspired by work from neuroscience on detecting model-based behavior in humans and animals. Our metric based on this setup, the Local Change Adaptation (LoCA) regret, measures how quickly an RL method adapts to a local change in the environment. Our metric can identify model-based behavior, even if the method uses a poor representation and provides insight in how close a method's behavior is from optimal model-based behavior. We use our setup to evaluate the model-based behavior of MuZero on a variation of the classic Mountain Car task.
Harm van Seijen, Hadi Nekoei, Evan Racah, Sarath Chandar
NeurIPS3
2019 Unsupervised State Representation Learning in Atari
abstract
State representation learning, or the ability to capture latent generative factors of an environment is crucial for building intelligent agents that can perform a wide variety of tasks. Learning such representations in an unsupervised manner without supervision from rewards is an open problem. We introduce a method that tries to learn better state representations by maximizing mutual information across spatially and temporally distinct features of a neural encoder of the observations. We also introduce a new benchmark based on Atari 2600 games where we evaluate representations based on how well they capture the ground truth state. We believe this new framework for evaluating representation learning models will be crucial for future representation learning research. Finally, we compare our technique with other state-of-the-art generative and contrastive representation learning methods.
Ankesh Anand, Evan Racah, Sherjil Ozair, Yoshua Bengio, Marc-Alexandre Côté, R. Devon Hjelm
NeurIPS2
2017 ExtremeWeather: A large-scale climate dataset for semi-supervised detection, localization, and understanding of extreme weather events
abstract
Then detection and identification of extreme weather events in large-scale climate simulations is an important problem for risk management, informing governmental policy decisions and advancing our basic understanding of the climate system. Recent work has shown that fully supervised convolutional neural networks (CNNs) can yield acceptable accuracy for classifying well-known types of extreme weather events when large amounts of labeled data are available. However, many different types of spatially localized climate patterns are of interest including hurricanes, extra-tropical cyclones, weather fronts, and blocking events among others. Existing labeled data for these patterns can be incomplete in various ways, such as covering only certain years or geographic areas and having false negatives. This type of climate data therefore poses a number of interesting machine learning challenges. We present a multichannel spatiotemporal CNN architecture for semi-supervised bounding box prediction and exploratory data analysis. We demonstrate that our approach is able to leverage temporal information and unlabeled data to improve the localization of extreme weather events. Further, we explore the representations learned by our model in order to better understand this important data. We present a dataset, ExtremeWeather, to encourage machine learning research in this area and to help facilitate further work in understanding and mitigating the effects of climate change. The dataset is available at extremeweatherdataset.github.io and the code is available at https://github.com/eracah/hur-detect.
Evan Racah, Christopher Beckham, Tegan Maharaj, Samira Ebrahimi Kahou, Prabhat, Christopher Joseph Pal
NIPS1
2017 Deep learning at 15PF: supervised and semi-supervised classification for scientific data
abstract
This paper presents the first, 15-PetaFLOP Deep Learning system for solving scientific pattern classification problems on contemporary HPC architectures. We develop supervised convolutional architectures for discriminating signals in high-energy physics data as well as semi-supervised architectures for localizing and classifying extreme weather in climate data. Our Intelcaffe-based implementation obtains ~2TFLOP/s on a single Cori Phase-II Xeon-Phi node. We use a hybrid strategy employing synchronous node-groups, while using asynchronous communication across groups. We use this strategy to scale training of a single model to ~9600 Xeon-Phi nodes; obtaining peak performance of 11.73-15.07 PFLOP/s and sustained performance of 11.41-13.27 PFLOP/s. At scale, our HEP architecture produces state-of-the-art classification accuracy on a dataset with 10M images, exceeding that achieved by selections on high-level physics-motivated features. Our semi-supervised architecture successfully extracts weather patterns in a 15TB climate dataset. Our results demonstrate that Deep Learning can be optimized and scaled effectively on many-core, HPC systems.
Thorsten Kurth, Jian Zhang 0049, Nadathur Satish, Evan Racah, Ioannis Mitliagkas, Md. Mostofa Ali Patwary, Tareq M. Malas, Narayanan Sundaram, Wahid Bhimji, Mikhail Smorkalov, Jack Deslippe, Mikhail Shiryaev, Srinivas Sridharan 0002, Prabhat, Pradeep Dubey
SC4
2016 Matrix factorizations at scale: A comparison of scientific data analytics in spark and C+MPI using three case studies
abstract
We explore the trade-offs of performing linear algebra using Apache Spark, compared to traditional C and MPI implementations on HPC platforms. Spark is designed for data analytics on cluster computing platforms with access to local disks and is optimized for data-parallel tasks. We examine three widely-used and important matrix factorizations: NMF (for physical plausability), PCA (for its ubiquity) and CX (for data interpretability). We apply these methods to 1.6TB particle physics, 2.2TB and 16TB climate modeling and 1.1TB bioimaging data. The data matrices are tall-and-skinny which enable the algorithms to map conveniently into Spark's data-parallel model. We perform scaling experiments on up to 1600 Cray XC40 nodes, describe the sources of slowdowns, and provide tuning guidance to obtain high performance.
Alex Gittens, Aditya Devarakonda, Evan Racah, Michael F. Ringenburg, Lisa Gerhardt, Jey Kottalam, Jialin Liu 0002, Kristyn J. Maschhoff, Shane Canon, Jatin Chhugani, Pramod Sharma, Jiyan Yang, James Demmel, Jim Harrell, Venkat Krishnamurthy, Michael W. Mahoney, Prabhat
IEEE BigData3
2016 Revealing Fundamental Physics from the Daya Bay Neutrino Experiment Using Deep Neural Networks
abstract
Experiments in particle physics produce enormous quantities of data that must be analyzed and interpreted by teams of physicists. This analysis is often exploratory, where scientists are unable to enumerate the possible types of signal prior to performing the experiment. Thus, tools for summarizing, clustering, visualizing and classifying high-dimensional data are essential. In this work, we show that meaningful physical content can be revealed by transforming the raw data into a learned high-level representation using deep neural networks, with measurements taken at the Daya Bay Neutrino Experiment as a case study. We further show how convolutional deep neural networks can provide an effective classification filter with greater than 97% accuracy across different classes of physics events, significantly better than other machine learning approaches.
Evan Racah, Seyoon Ko, Peter J. Sadowski, Wahid Bhimji, Craig Tull, Sang-Yun Oh, Pierre Baldi, Prabhat
ICMLA1
2016 PANDA: Extreme Scale Parallel K-Nearest Neighbor on Distributed Architectures
abstract
Computing k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) is one of the core kernels used in many machine learning, data mining and scientific computing applications. Although kd-tree based O(log n) algorithms have been proposed for computing KNN, due to its inherent sequentiality, linear algorithms are being used in practice. This limits the applicability of such methods to millions of data points, with limited scalability for Big Data analytics challenges in the scientific domain. In this paper, we present parallel and highly optimized kd*tree based KNN algorithms (both construction and querying) suitable for distributed architectures. Our algorithm includes novel approaches for pruning search space and improving load balancing and partitioning among nodes and threads. Using TB-sized datasets from three science applications: astrophysics, plasma physics, and particle physics, we show that our implementation can construct kd-tree of 189 billion particles in 48 seconds on utilizing ~50,000 cores. We also demonstrate computation of KNN of 19 billion queries in 12 seconds. We demonstrate almost linear speedup both for shared and distributed memory computers. Our algorithms outperforms earlier implementations by more than order of magnitude, thereby radically improving the applicability of our implementation to state-of-the-art Big Data analytics problems.
Md. Mostofa Ali Patwary, Nadathur Satish, Narayanan Sundaram, Jialin Liu 0002, Peter J. Sadowski, Evan Racah, Surendra Byna, Craig Tull, Wahid Bhimji, Prabhat, Pradeep Dubey
IPDPS6