EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Werner Zellinger
dblp:175/2798
· DBLP profile ↗
14ranked-venue papers
5as first author
8since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-1166-6062ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 12 · 4 first-author · 7 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
9 papers |
Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 24% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 23% Learning theory · 19% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 18 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › density estimation
density ratio estimation |
3.0 | 4 | 2025 | Binary Losses for Density Ratio Estimation · ICLR 2025 On Regularized Radon-Nikodym Differentiation · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 Overcoming Saturation in Density Ratio Estimation by Iterated Regularization · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation
unsupervised domain adaptation |
1.9 | 3 | 2024 | Overcoming Saturation in Density Ratio Estimation by Iterated Regularization · ICML 2024 Addressing Parameter Choice Issues in Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Aggregation · ICLR 2023 The balancing principle for parameter choice in distance-regularized domain adaptation · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain adaptation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Binary Losses for Density Ratio Estimation · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
loss function design |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Binary Losses for Density Ratio Estimation · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical learning theory › regularization theory
iterative regularization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Overcoming Saturation in Density Ratio Estimation by Iterated Regularization · ICML 2024 |
Mathematical optimization
regularization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | On Regularized Radon-Nikodym Differentiation · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
hyperparameter optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Addressing Parameter Choice Issues in Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Aggregation · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › model selection
parameter selection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Addressing Parameter Choice Issues in Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Aggregation · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods
reproducing kernel hilbert space |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Adaptive Learning of Density Ratios in RKHS · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
ReLU networks |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Tessellation-Filtering ReLU Neural Networks · IJCAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | The balancing principle for parameter choice in distance-regularized domain adaptation · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › hyperparameter optimization
regularization parameter selection |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | The balancing principle for parameter choice in distance-regularized domain adaptation · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization error
target error bound |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | The balancing principle for parameter choice in distance-regularized domain adaptation · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative adversarial network |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Mixture Density Generative Adversarial Networks · CVPR 2019 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative adversarial network › GAN training
mode collapse |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Mixture Density Generative Adversarial Networks · CVPR 2019 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › invariant representation learning
domain-invariant representation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Central Moment Discrepancy (CMD) for Domain-Invariant Representation Learning · ICLR (Poster) 2017 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain-invariant representation learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Central Moment Discrepancy (CMD) for Domain-Invariant Representation Learning · ICLR (Poster) 2017 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Tessellation-Filtering ReLU Neural Networks · IJCAI 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
regularization · 2.0bregman divergence · 1.5reproducing kernel hilbert space · 1.5christoffel functions · 1.5binary classification · 0.9kernel methods · 0.8lepskii parameter choice · 0.7aggregation · 0.7inverse problem · 0.5balancing principle · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Binary Losses for Density Ratio EstimationabstractEstimating the ratio of two probability densities from a finite number of observations is a central machine learning problem. A common approach is to construct estimators using binary classifiers that distinguish observations from the two densities. However, the accuracy of these estimators depends on the choice of the binary loss function, raising the question of which loss function to choose based on desired error properties. For example, traditional loss functions, such as logistic or boosting loss, prioritize accurate estimation of small density ratio values over large ones, even though the latter are more critical in many applications.
In this work, we start with prescribed error measures in a class of Bregman divergences and characterize all loss functions that result in density ratio estimators with small error. Our characterization extends results on composite binary losses from Reid & Williamson (2010) and their connection to density ratio estimation as identified by Menon & Ong (2016). As a result, we obtain a simple recipe for constructing loss functions with certain properties, such as those that prioritize an accurate estimation of large density ratio values. Our novel loss functions outperform related approaches for resolving parameter choice issues of 11 deep domain adaptation algorithms in average performance across 484 real-world tasks including sensor signals, texts, and images. Werner Zellinger |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2024 | Overcoming Saturation in Density Ratio Estimation by Iterated RegularizationabstractEstimating the ratio of two probability densities from finitely many samples, is a central task in machine learning and statistics. In this work, we show that a large class of kernel methods for density ratio estimation suffers from error saturation, which prevents algorithms from achieving fast error convergence rates on highly regular learning problems. To resolve saturation, we introduce iterated regularization in density ratio estimation to achieve fast error rates. Our methods outperform its non-iteratively regularized versions on benchmarks for density ratio estimation as well as on large-scale evaluations for importance-weighted ensembling of deep unsupervised domain adaptation models. Lukas Gruber, Markus Holzleitner, Johannes Lehner, Sepp Hochreiter, Werner Zellinger |
ICML | 5 |
| 2024 | Rethinking data augmentation for adversarial robustness
Hamid Eghbalzadeh, Werner Zellinger, Maura Pintor, Kathrin Grosse, Khaled Koutini, Bernhard Moser 0001, Battista Biggio, Gerhard Widmer |
Inf. Sci. | 2 |
| 2024 | On Regularized Radon-Nikodym DifferentiationabstractWe discuss the problem of estimating Radon-Nikodym derivatives. This problem appears in various applications, such as covariate shift adaptation, likelihood-ratio testing, mutual information estimation, and conditional probability estimation. However, in many of the above applications one is interested in the pointwise evaluation of the Radon-Nikodym derivatives rather than in their approximation as elements of some spaces of functions, and this aspect has been left unexplored in the previous studies. To address the above problem, we employ the general regularization scheme in reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces. The convergence rate of the corresponding regularized algorithm is established by taking into account both the smoothness of the derivative and the capacity of the space in which it is estimated. This is done in terms of general source conditions and the regularized Christoffel functions. We also find that the reconstruction of Radon-Nikodym derivatives at any particular point can be done with higher order of accuracy as compared to the reported work available so far. Our theoretical results are illustrated by numerical simulations. Duc Hoan Nguyen, Werner Zellinger, Sergei V. Pereverzyev |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2023 | Addressing Parameter Choice Issues in Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Aggregation
Marius-Constantin Dinu, Markus Holzleitner, Maximilian Beck, Hoan Duc Nguyen, Andrea Huber, Hamid Eghbalzadeh, Bernhard Moser 0001, Sergei V. Pereverzyev, Sepp Hochreiter, Werner Zellinger |
ICLR | 10 |
| 2023 | Adaptive Learning of Density Ratios in RKHSabstractEstimating the ratio of two probability densities from finitely many observations of the densities is a central problem in machine learning and statistics with applications in two-sample testing, divergence estimation, generative modeling, covariate shift adaptation, conditional density estimation, and novelty detection. In this work, we analyze a large class of density ratio estimation methods that minimize a regularized Bregman divergence between the true density ratio and a model in a reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS). We derive new finite-sample error bounds, and we propose a Lepskii type parameter choice principle that minimizes the bounds without knowledge of the regularity of the density ratio. In the special case of square loss, our method adaptively achieves a minimax optimal error rate. A numerical illustration is provided. Werner Zellinger, Stefan Kindermann 0001, Sergei V. Pereverzyev |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2022 | Tessellation-Filtering ReLU Neural NetworksabstractWe identify tessellation-filtering ReLU neural networks that, when composed with another ReLU network, keep its non-redundant tessellation unchanged or reduce it.The additional network complexity modifies the shape of the decision surface without increasing the number of linear regions. We provide a mathematical understanding of the related additional expressiveness by means of a novel measure of shape complexity by counting deviations from convexity which results in a Boolean algebraic characterization of this special class. A local representation theorem gives rise to novel approaches for pruning and decision surface analysis. Bernhard Moser 0001, Michal Lewandowski, Somayeh Kargaran, Werner Zellinger, Battista Biggio, Christoph Koutschan |
IJCAI | 4 |
| 2021 | The balancing principle for parameter choice in distance-regularized domain adaptationabstractWe address the unsolved algorithm design problem of choosing a justified regularization parameter in unsupervised domain adaptation. This problem is intriguing as no labels are available in the target domain. Our approach starts with the observation that the widely-used method of minimizing the source error, penalized by a distance measure between source and target feature representations, shares characteristics with regularized ill-posed inverse problems. Regularization parameters in inverse problems are optimally chosen by the fundamental principle of balancing approximation and sampling errors. We use this principle to balance learning errors and domain distance in a target error bound. As a result, we obtain a theoretically justified rule for the choice of the regularization parameter. In contrast to the state of the art, our approach allows source and target distributions with disjoint supports. An empirical comparative study on benchmark datasets underpins the performance of our approach. Werner Zellinger, Natalia Shepeleva, Marius-Constantin Dinu, Hamid Eghbalzadeh, Hoan Duc Nguyen, Bernhard Nessler, Sergei V. Pereverzyev, Bernhard Moser 0001 |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2020 | Applying AI in Practice: Key Challenges and Lessons Learned
Lukas Fischer 0001, Lisa Ehrlinger, Verena Geist, Rudolf Ramler, Florian Sobieczky, Werner Zellinger, Bernhard Moser 0001 |
CD-MAKE | 6 |
| 2020 | Domain adaptation for regression under Beer-Lambert's law
Ramin Nikzad-Langerodi, Werner Zellinger, Susanne Saminger-Platz, Bernhard Moser 0001 |
Knowl. Based Syst. | 2 |
| 2019 | Mixture Density Generative Adversarial NetworksabstractGenerative Adversarial Networks have a surprising ability to generate sharp and realistic images, but they are known to suffer from the so-called mode collapse problem. In this paper, we propose a new GAN variant called Mixture Density GAN that overcomes this problem by encouraging the Discriminator to form clusters in its embedding space, which in turn leads the Generator to exploit these and discover different modes in the data. This is achieved by positioning Gaussian density functions in the corners of a simplex, using the resulting Gaussian mixture as a likelihood function over discriminator embeddings, and formulating an objective function for GAN training that is based on these likelihoods. We show how formation of these clusters changes the probability landscape of the discriminator and improves the mode discovery of the GAN. We also show that the optimum of our training objective is attained if and only if the generated and the real distribution match exactly. We support our theoretical results with empirical evaluations on three mode discovery benchmark datasets (Stacked-MNIST, Ring of Gaussians and Grid of Gaussians), and four image datasets (CIFAR-10, CelebA, MNIST, and Fashion-MNIST). Furthermore, we demonstrate (1) the ability to avoid mode collapse and discover all the modes and (2) superior quality of the generated images (as measured by the Fréchet Inception Distance (FID)), achieving the lowest FID compared to all baselines. Hamid Eghbalzadeh, Werner Zellinger, Gerhard Widmer |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2019 | Domain-Invariant Regression Under Beer-Lambert's LawabstractWe consider the problem of unsupervised domain adaptation (DA) in regression under the assumption of linear hypotheses (e.g. Beer-Lambert's law) - a task recurrently encountered in analytical chemistry. Following the ideas from the non-linear iterative partial least squares (NIPALS) method, we propose a novel algorithm that identifies a low-dimensional subspace aiming at the following two objectives: i) the projections of the source domain samples are informative w.r.t. the output variable and ii) the projected domain-specific input samples have a small covariance difference. In particular, the latent variable vectors that span this subspace are derived in closed-form by solving a constrained optimization problem for each subspace dimension adding flexibility for balancing the two objectives. We demonstrate the superiority of our approach over several state-of-the-art (SoA) methods on two typical DA scenarios involving unsupervised adaptation of multivariate calibration models between different process lines in melamine production and equality to SoA on a well-known benchmark dataset from analytical chemistry involving (unsupervised) model adaptation between different spectrometers. The former data set is provided along with this paper. Ramin Nikzad-Langerodi, Werner Zellinger, Susanne Saminger-Platz, Bernhard Moser 0001 |
ICMLA | 2 |
| 2019 | Robust unsupervised domain adaptation for neural networks via moment alignment
Werner Zellinger, Bernhard Moser 0001, Thomas Grubinger, Edwin Lughofer, Thomas Natschläger, Susanne Saminger-Platz |
Inf. Sci. | 1 |
| 2017 | Central Moment Discrepancy (CMD) for Domain-Invariant Representation Learning
Werner Zellinger, Thomas Grubinger, Edwin Lughofer, Thomas Natschläger, Susanne Saminger-Platz |
ICLR (Poster) | 1 |