Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Masataka Nishi

dblp:175/3929 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automated reasoning and model checking · 67% Computational complexity · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Automated reasoning and model checking › model checking
bounded model checking
0.212016
Towards bounded model checking using nonlinear programming solver · ASE 2016
Computational complexity
constraint satisfaction
0.212016
Towards bounded model checking using nonlinear programming solver · ASE 2016
Automated reasoning and model checking › satisfiability modulo theories
nonlinear arithmetic
0.212016
Towards bounded model checking using nonlinear programming solver · ASE 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

nonlinear programming · 0.2IPOPT · 0.2ANTIGONE · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Towards bounded model checking using nonlinear programming solver
abstract
Due to their complexity, currently available bounded model checking techniques based on Boolean Satisfiability and Satisfiability Modulo Theories inadequately handle non-linear floating-point and integer arithmetic. Using a numerical approach, we reduce a bounded model checking problem to a constraint satisfaction problem. Currently available techniques attempt to solve the constraint problem but can guarantee neither global convergence nor correctness. Using the IPOPT and ANTIGONE non-linear programming (NLP) solvers, we transform the original constraint satisfaction problem from one having disjunctions of constraints into one having conjunctions of constraints with a few introduced auxiliary variables. The transformation lowers the computing cost and preserves the Boolean structure of the original problem while complying with limits of NLP solvers.
Masataka Nishi
ASE1