EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Florian Kraus
dblp:175/4631
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0003-4368-8418ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2Theory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Image recognition and object detection · 25% Video understanding and tracking · 25% Autonomous driving · 24% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Autonomous driving
perception |
0.6 | 2 | 2020 | Seeing Through Fog Without Seeing Fog: Deep Multimodal Sensor Fusion in Unseen Adverse Weather · CVPR 2020 Seeing Around Street Corners: Non-Line-of-Sight Detection and Tracking In-the-Wild Using Doppler Radar · CVPR 2020 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › sensor fusion
multimodal sensor fusion |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Seeing Through Fog Without Seeing Fog: Deep Multimodal Sensor Fusion in Unseen Adverse Weather · CVPR 2020 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Seeing Through Fog Without Seeing Fog: Deep Multimodal Sensor Fusion in Unseen Adverse Weather · CVPR 2020 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
object tracking |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Seeing Around Street Corners: Non-Line-of-Sight Detection and Tracking In-the-Wild Using Doppler Radar · CVPR 2020 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › object tracking › robust tracking
occluded object tracking |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Seeing Around Street Corners: Non-Line-of-Sight Detection and Tracking In-the-Wild Using Doppler Radar · CVPR 2020 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
robust object detection |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Seeing Through Fog Without Seeing Fog: Deep Multimodal Sensor Fusion in Unseen Adverse Weather · CVPR 2020 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving › perception
non-line-of-sight detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Seeing Around Street Corners: Non-Line-of-Sight Detection and Tracking In-the-Wild Using Doppler Radar · CVPR 2020 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving › perception › perception robustness
perception in adverse weather |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Seeing Through Fog Without Seeing Fog: Deep Multimodal Sensor Fusion in Unseen Adverse Weather · CVPR 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
temporal fusion · 0.4measurement entropy · 0.4joint detection and tracking network · 0.4feature fusion · 0.4doppler radar · 0.4deep fusion network · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | The Radar Ghost Dataset - An Evaluation of Ghost Objects in Automotive Radar DataabstractRadar sensors have a long tradition in advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) and also play a major role in current concepts for autonomous vehicles. Their importance is reasoned by their high robustness against meteorological effects, such as rain, snow, or fog, and the radar’s ability to measure relative radial velocity differences via the Doppler effect. The cause for these advantages, namely the large wavelength, is also one of the drawbacks of radar sensors. Compared to camera or lidar sensor, a lot more surfaces in a typical traffic scenario appear flat relative to the radar’s emitted signal. This results in multi-path reflections or so called ghost detections in the radar signal. Ghost objects pose a major source for potential false positive detections in a vehicle’s perception pipeline. Therefore, it is important to be able to segregate multipath reflections from direct ones. In this article, we present a dataset with detailed manual annotations for different kinds of ghost detections. Moreover, two different approaches for identifying these kinds of objects are evaluated. We hope that our dataset encourages more researchers to engage in the fields of multi-path object suppression or exploitation. Florian Kraus, Nicolas Scheiner, Werner Ritter, Klaus Dietmayer |
IROS | 1 |
| 2020 | Seeing Through Fog Without Seeing Fog: Deep Multimodal Sensor Fusion in Unseen Adverse WeatherabstractThe fusion of multimodal sensor streams, such as camera, lidar, and radar measurements, plays a critical role in object detection for autonomous vehicles, which base their decision making on these inputs. While existing methods exploit redundant information in good environmental conditions, they fail in adverse weather where the sensory streams can be asymmetrically distorted. These rare ``edge-case'' scenarios are not represented in available datasets, and existing fusion architectures are not designed to handle them. To address this challenge we present a novel multimodal dataset acquired in over 10,000~km of driving in northern Europe. Although this dataset is the first large multimodal dataset in adverse weather, with 100k labels for lidar, camera, radar, and gated NIR sensors, it does not facilitate training as extreme weather is rare. To this end, we present a deep fusion network for robust fusion without a large corpus of labeled training data covering all asymmetric distortions. Departing from proposal-level fusion, we propose a single-shot model that adaptively fuses features, driven by measurement entropy. We validate the proposed method, trained on clean data, on our extensive validation dataset. Code and data are available here https://github.com/princeton-computational-imaging/SeeingThroughFog. Mario Bijelic, Tobias Gruber, Fahim Mannan, Florian Kraus, Werner Ritter, Klaus Dietmayer, Felix Heide |
CVPR | 4 |
| 2020 | Seeing Around Street Corners: Non-Line-of-Sight Detection and Tracking In-the-Wild Using Doppler RadarabstractConventional sensor systems record information about directly visible objects, whereas occluded scene components are considered lost in the measurement process. Non-line-of-sight (NLOS) methods try to recover such hidden objects from their indirect reflections - faint signal components, traditionally treated as measurement noise. Existing NLOS approaches struggle to record these low-signal components outside the lab, and do not scale to large-scale outdoor scenes and high-speed motion, typical in automotive scenarios. In particular, optical NLOS capture is fundamentally limited by the quartic intensity falloff of diffuse indirect reflections. In this work, we depart from visible-wavelength approaches and demonstrate detection, classification, and tracking of hidden objects in large-scale dynamic environments using Doppler radars that can be manufactured at low-cost in series production. To untangle noisy indirect and direct reflections, we learn from temporal sequences of Doppler velocity and position measurements, which we fuse in a joint NLOS detection and tracking network over time. We validate the approach on in-the-wild automotive scenes, including sequences of parked cars or house facades as relay surfaces, and demonstrate low-cost, real-time NLOS in dynamic automotive environments. Nicolas Scheiner, Florian Kraus, Fangyin Wei, Buu Phan, Fahim Mannan, Nils Appenrodt, Werner Ritter, Jürgen Dickmann, Klaus Dietmayer, Bernhard Sick, Felix Heide |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2020 | Off-the-shelf sensor vs. experimental radar - How much resolution is necessary in automotive radar classification?abstractRadar-based road user detection is an important topic in the context of autonomous driving applications. The resolution of conventional automotive radar sensors results in a sparse data representation which is tough to refine during subsequent signal processing. On the other hand, a new sensor generation is waiting in the wings for its application in this challenging field. In this article, two sensors of different radar generations are evaluated against each other. The evaluation criterion is the performance on moving road user object detection and classification tasks. To this end, two data sets originating from an off-the-shelf radar and a high resolution next generation radar are compared. Special attention is given on how the two data sets are assembled in order to make them comparable. The utilized object detector consists of a clustering algorithm, a feature extraction module, and a recurrent neural network ensemble for classification. For the assessment, all components are evaluated both individually and, for the first time, as a whole. This allows for indicating where overall performance improvements have their origin in the pipeline. Furthermore, the generalization capabilities of both data sets are evaluated and important comparison metrics for automotive radar object detection are discussed. Results show clear benefits of the next generation radar. Interestingly, those benefits do not actually occur due to better performance at the classification stage, but rather because of the vast improvements at the clustering stage. Nicolas Scheiner, Ole Schumann, Florian Kraus, Nils Appenrodt, Jürgen Dickmann, Bernhard Sick |
FUSION | 3 |
| 2019 | From Pattern Invocation Networks to Rule Preconditions
Nils Weidmann, Anthony Anjorin, Florian Stolte, Florian Kraus |
ICGT | 4 |
| 2019 | Zynq-based acceleration of robust high density myoelectric signal processing
Alexander Boschmann, Andreas Agne, Georg Thombansen, Linus Witschen, Florian Kraus, Marco Platzner |
J. Parallel Distributed Comput. | 5 |