Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sebastien Leger

dblp:175/4684 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Hardware security and side channels · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Hardware security and side channels › side-channel attack › profiled side-channel attack
deep learning-based side-channel attack
0.412020
Deep Learning Multi-Channel Fusion Attack Against Side-Channel Protected Hardware · DAC 2020
Hardware security and side channels › side-channel attack
profiled side-channel attack
0.412020
Deep Learning Multi-Channel Fusion Attack Against Side-Channel Protected Hardware · DAC 2020
Hardware security and side channels
side-channel attack
0.412020
Deep Learning Multi-Channel Fusion Attack Against Side-Channel Protected Hardware · DAC 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

information fusion · 0.4deep learning · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Deep Learning Multi-Channel Fusion Attack Against Side-Channel Protected Hardware
abstract
State-of-the-art hardware masking approaches like threshold implementations and domain-oriented masking provide a guaranteed level of security even in the presence of glitches. Although provable secure in theory, recent work showed that the effective security order of a masked hardware implementation can be lowered by applying a multi-probe attack or exploiting externally amplified coupling effects. However, the proposed attacks are based on an unrealistic adversary model (i.e. knowledge of masks values during profiling) or require complex measurement setup manipulations.In this work, we propose a novel attack vector that exploits location dependent leakage from several decoupling capacitors of a modern System-on-Chip (SoC) with 16 nm fabrication technology. We combine the leakage from different sources using a deep learning-based information fusion approach. The results show a remarkable advantage regarding the number of required traces for a successful key recovery compared to state-of-the-art profiled side-channel attacks. All evaluations are performed under realistic conditions, resulting in a real-world attack scenario that is not limited to academic environments.
Benjamin Hettwer, Daniel Fennes, Sebastien Leger, Jan Richter-Brockmann, Stefan Gehrer, Tim Güneysu
DAC3
2020 Lightweight Side-Channel Protection using Dynamic Clock Randomization
abstract
Power analysis attacks have evolved rapidly over the past two decades, recently strengthened by advanced deep learning algorithms. However, the application of effective countermeasures such as masking is often challenging in practice due to restricted power and area resources of cryptographic devices. On the other hand, lightweight hiding methods like random data delays often introduce only a small amount of entropy in the execution process, and thus provide only a moderate level of protection. In this work, we propose and evaluate a generic hiding countermeasure based on dynamic clock frequency randomization. We exploit runtime reconfiguration of modern reconfigurable devices to produce a highly unstable clock signal, which yields up to 20 million different execution times for an AES encryption operation. Our design not only creates heavy misalignments in the power traces, but is also highly customizable and can be easily composed with other side-channel countermeasures. We test our approach using recently proposed evaluation methods for desynchronized power traces including sliding-window correlation analysis and deep neural networks. The results show that none of the attacks is able to recover the secret key with one million power traces. Furthermore, we could not detect any first-order leakage in five million encryptions using state-of-the-art leakage assessment.
Benjamin Hettwer, Kallyan Das, Sebastien Leger, Stefan Gehrer, Tim Güneysu
FPL3