Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Arambam James Singh

dblp:175/5473 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Multi-agent systems · 60% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 40%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Smart cities and intelligent transportation · 60% Environmental and earth informatics · 40%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
multi-agent decision making
0.412019
Multiagent Decision Making For Maritime Traffic Management · AAAI 2019
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
decision making under uncertainty
0.212016
Robust Decision Making for Stochastic Network Design · AAAI 2016
Mathematical optimization › online optimization
minimax regret
0.212016
Robust Decision Making for Stochastic Network Design · AAAI 2016
Mathematical optimization › optimization under uncertainty
robust optimization
0.212016
Robust Decision Making for Stochastic Network Design · AAAI 2016
Smart cities and intelligent transportation › traffic management
maritime traffic management
0.112019
Multiagent Decision Making For Maritime Traffic Management · AAAI 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

traffic simulation · 0.8policy gradient · 0.8multi-agent reinforcement learning · 0.8minimax regret · 0.8interval bounds · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 CRLLK: Constrained Reinforcement Learning for Lane Keeping in Autonomous Driving
Xinwei Gao, Arambam James Singh, Gangadhar Royyuru, Michael Yuhas, Arvind Easwaran
AAMAS2
2022 Trajectory Optimization for Safe Navigation in Maritime Traffic Using Historical Data
Chaithanya Basrur, Arambam James Singh, Arunesh Sinha, Akshat Kumar, T. K. Satish Kumar
CP2
2022 Constrained Multiagent Reinforcement Learning for Large Agent Population
Jiajing Ling, Arambam James Singh, Nguyen Duc Thien, Akshat Kumar
ECML/PKDD (4)2
2019 Multiagent Decision Making For Maritime Traffic Management
abstract
We address the problem of maritime traffic management in busy waterways to increase the safety of navigation by reducing congestion. We model maritime traffic as a large multiagent systems with individual vessels as agents, and VTS authority as the regulatory agent. We develop a maritime traffic simulator based on historical traffic data that incorporates realistic domain constraints such as uncertain and asynchronous movement of vessels. We also develop a traffic coordination approach that provides speed recommendation to vessels in different zones. We exploit the nature of collective interactions among agents to develop a scalable policy gradient approach that can scale up to real world problems. Empirical results on synthetic and real world problems show that our approach can significantly reduce congestion while keeping the traffic throughput high.
Arambam James Singh, Duc Thien Nguyen, Akshat Kumar, Hoong Chuin Lau
AAAI1
2016 Robust Decision Making for Stochastic Network Design
abstract
We address the problem of robust decision making for stochastic network design. Our work is motivated by spatial conservation planning where the goal is to take management decisions within a fixed budget to maximize the expected spread of a population of species over a network of land parcels. Most previous work for this problem assumes that accurate estimates of different network parameters (edge activation probabilities, habitat suitability scores) are available, which is an unrealistic assumption. To address this shortcoming, we assume that network parameters are only partially known, specified via interval bounds. We then develop a decision making approach that computes the solution with minimax regret. We provide new theoretical results regarding the structure of the minmax regret solution which help develop a computationally efficient approach. Empirically, we show that previous approaches that work on point estimates of network parameters result in high regret on several standard benchmarks, while our approach provides significantly more robust solutions.
Akshat Kumar, Arambam James Singh, Pradeep Varakantham, Daniel Sheldon
AAAI2
2014 Multi Agent Based Dynamic Task Allocation
Arambam James Singh, Poulami Dalapati, Animesh Dutta
KES-AMSTA1