Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Arambam James Singh
dblp:175/5473
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Multi-agent systems · 60% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 40% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Smart cities and intelligent transportation · 60% Environmental and earth informatics · 40% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
multi-agent decision making |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Multiagent Decision Making For Maritime Traffic Management · AAAI 2019 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
decision making under uncertainty |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Robust Decision Making for Stochastic Network Design · AAAI 2016 |
Mathematical optimization › online optimization
minimax regret |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Robust Decision Making for Stochastic Network Design · AAAI 2016 |
Mathematical optimization › optimization under uncertainty
robust optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Robust Decision Making for Stochastic Network Design · AAAI 2016 |
Smart cities and intelligent transportation › traffic management
maritime traffic management |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Multiagent Decision Making For Maritime Traffic Management · AAAI 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
traffic simulation · 0.8policy gradient · 0.8multi-agent reinforcement learning · 0.8minimax regret · 0.8interval bounds · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | CRLLK: Constrained Reinforcement Learning for Lane Keeping in Autonomous Driving
Xinwei Gao, Arambam James Singh, Gangadhar Royyuru, Michael Yuhas, Arvind Easwaran |
AAMAS | 2 |
| 2022 | Trajectory Optimization for Safe Navigation in Maritime Traffic Using Historical Data
Chaithanya Basrur, Arambam James Singh, Arunesh Sinha, Akshat Kumar, T. K. Satish Kumar |
CP | 2 |
| 2022 | Constrained Multiagent Reinforcement Learning for Large Agent Population
Jiajing Ling, Arambam James Singh, Nguyen Duc Thien, Akshat Kumar |
ECML/PKDD (4) | 2 |
| 2019 | Multiagent Decision Making For Maritime Traffic ManagementabstractWe address the problem of maritime traffic management in busy waterways to increase the safety of navigation by reducing congestion. We model maritime traffic as a large multiagent systems with individual vessels as agents, and VTS authority as the regulatory agent. We develop a maritime traffic simulator based on historical traffic data that incorporates realistic domain constraints such as uncertain and asynchronous movement of vessels. We also develop a traffic coordination approach that provides speed recommendation to vessels in different zones. We exploit the nature of collective interactions among agents to develop a scalable policy gradient approach that can scale up to real world problems. Empirical results on synthetic and real world problems show that our approach can significantly reduce congestion while keeping the traffic throughput high. Arambam James Singh, Duc Thien Nguyen, Akshat Kumar, Hoong Chuin Lau |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2016 | Robust Decision Making for Stochastic Network DesignabstractWe address the problem of robust decision making for stochastic network design. Our work is motivated by spatial conservation planning where the goal is to take management decisions within a fixed budget to maximize the expected spread of a population of species over a network of land parcels. Most previous work for this problem assumes that accurate estimates of different network parameters (edge activation probabilities, habitat suitability scores) are available, which is an unrealistic assumption. To address this shortcoming, we assume that network parameters are only partially known, specified via interval bounds. We then develop a decision making approach that computes the solution with minimax regret. We provide new theoretical results regarding the structure of the minmax regret solution which help develop a computationally efficient approach. Empirically, we show that previous approaches that work on point estimates of network parameters result in high regret on several standard benchmarks, while our approach provides significantly more robust solutions. Akshat Kumar, Arambam James Singh, Pradeep Varakantham, Daniel Sheldon |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2014 | Multi Agent Based Dynamic Task Allocation
Arambam James Singh, Poulami Dalapati, Animesh Dutta |
KES-AMSTA | 1 |