Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Amin Abazari

dblp:175/6199 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 61% Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 30% Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › high-level synthesis
hardware generation
0.212016
Resolve: Generation of High-Performance Sorting Architectures from High-Level Synthesis · FPGA 2016
Electronic design automation
high-level synthesis
0.212016
Resolve: Generation of High-Performance Sorting Architectures from High-Level Synthesis · FPGA 2016
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › domain-specific accelerator
sorting accelerator
0.212016
Resolve: Generation of High-Performance Sorting Architectures from High-Level Synthesis · FPGA 2016
Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs
FPGA accelerator
0.112016
Resolve: Generation of High-Performance Sorting Architectures from High-Level Synthesis · FPGA 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

architecture composition · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Resolve: Generation of High-Performance Sorting Architectures from High-Level Synthesis
abstract
Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) implementations of sorting algorithms have proven to be efficient, but existing implementations lack portability and maintainability because they are written in low-level hardware description languages that require substantial domain expertise to develop and maintain. To address this problem, we develop a framework that generates sorting architectures for different requirements (speed, area, power, etc.). Our framework provides ten highly optimized basic sorting architectures, easily composes basic architectures to generate hybrid sorting architectures, enables non-hardware experts to quickly design efficient hardware sorters, and facilitates the development of customized heterogeneous FPGA/CPU sorting systems. Experimental results show that our framework generates architectures that perform at least as well as existing RTL implementations for arrays smaller than 16K elements, and are comparable to RTL implementations for sorting larger arrays. We demonstrate a prototype of an end-to-end system using our sorting architectures for large arrays (16K-130K) on a heterogeneous FPGA/CPU system.
Janarbek Matai, Dustin Richmond, Dajung Lee, Zac Blair, Qiongzhi Wu, Amin Abazari, Ryan Kastner
FPGA6