Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jesper Puge Nielsen

dblp:175/6617 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Parallel and multicore computing · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Parallel and multicore computing
concurrent data structures
0.212016
A scalable lock-free hash table with open addressing · PPoPP 2016
Parallel and multicore computing › concurrent data structures
lock-free hash table
0.212016
A scalable lock-free hash table with open addressing · PPoPP 2016
Parallel and multicore computing
concurrent programming
0.112016
A scalable lock-free hash table with open addressing · PPoPP 2016
Parallel and multicore computing › synchronization
non-blocking synchronization
0.112016
A scalable lock-free hash table with open addressing · PPoPP 2016
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 A scalable lock-free hash table with open addressing
abstract
Concurrent data structures synchronized with locks do not scale well with the number of threads. As more scalable alternatives, concurrent data structures and algorithms based on widely available, however advanced, atomic operations have been proposed. These data structures allow for correct and concurrent operations without any locks. In this paper, we present a new fully lock-free open addressed hash table with a simpler design than prior published work. We split hash table insertions into two atomic phases: first inserting a value ignoring other concurrent operations, then in the second phase resolve any duplicate or conflicting values.
Jesper Puge Nielsen, Sven Karlsson
PPoPP1