Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nikitas Rontsis
dblp:175/9534
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Optimization for machine learning · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
acquisition function |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Distributionally Ambiguous Optimization for Batch Bayesian Optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
batch bayesian optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Distributionally Ambiguous Optimization for Batch Bayesian Optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Distributionally Ambiguous Optimization for Batch Bayesian Optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Distributionally Ambiguous Optimization for Batch Bayesian Optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Mathematical optimization › optimization under uncertainty › robust optimization
distributionally robust optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Distributionally Ambiguous Optimization for Batch Bayesian Optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gaussian expectation · 0.9expected improvement · 0.9convex optimization · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Optimal Approximation of Doubly Stochastic MatricesabstractWe consider the least-squares approximation of a matrix C in the set of doubly stochastic matrices with the same sparsity pattern as C. Our approach is based on applying the well-known Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (ADMM) to a reformulation of the original problem. Our resulting algorithm requires an initial Cholesky factorization of a positive definite matrix that has the same sparsity pattern as C + I followed by simple iterations whose complexity is linear in the number of nonzeros in C, thus ensuring excellent scalability and speed. We demonstrate the advantages of our approach in a series of experiments on problems with up to 82 million nonzeros; these include normalizing large scale matrices arising from the 3D structure of the human genome, clustering applications, and the SuiteSparse matrix library. Overall, our experiments illustrate the outstanding scalability of our algorithm; matrices with millions of nonzeros can be approximated in a few seconds on modest desktop computing hardware. Nikitas Rontsis, Paul J. Goulart |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2020 | Distributionally Ambiguous Optimization for Batch Bayesian OptimizationabstractWe propose a novel, theoretically-grounded, acquisition function for Batch Bayesian Optimization informed by insights from distributionally ambiguous optimization. Our acquisition function is a lower bound on the well-known Expected Improvement function, which requires evaluation of a Gaussian expectation over a multivariate piecewise affine function. Our bound is computed instead by evaluating the best-case expectation over all probability distributions consistent with the same mean and variance as the original Gaussian distribution. Unlike alternative approaches, including Expected Improvement, our proposed acquisition function avoids multi-dimensional integrations entirely, and can be computed exactly - even on large batch sizes - as the solution of a tractable convex optimization problem. Our suggested acquisition function can also be optimized efficiently, since first and second derivative information can be calculated inexpensively as by-products of the acquisition function calculation itself. We derive various novel theorems that ground our work theoretically and we demonstrate superior performance via simple motivating examples, benchmark functions and real-world problems. Nikitas Rontsis, Michael A. Osborne, Paul J. Goulart |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |