Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Ekaterina Lobacheva

dblp:176/1464 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
4as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-1538-1286ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 4 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
9 papers
Deep learning architectures and training · 38% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 18% Efficient and distributed learning · 12%

Topics — the 20 heaviest of 24, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training dynamics
1.422025
Training Dynamics Underlying Language Model Scaling Laws: Loss Deceleration and Zero-Sum Learning · ACL (1) 2025
Training Scale-Invariant Neural Networks on the Sphere Can Happen in Three Regimes · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
fine-tuning
0.922024
To Stay or Not to Stay in the Pre-train Basin: Insights on Ensembling in Transfer Learning · NeurIPS 2023
Where Do Large Learning Rates Lead Us? · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
scaling laws
0.912025
Training Dynamics Underlying Language Model Scaling Laws: Loss Deceleration and Zero-Sum Learning · ACL (1) 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
0.822020
Structured Sparsification of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks · AAAI 2020
Bayesian Compression for Natural Language Processing · EMNLP 2018
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
learning rate schedule
0.812024
Where Do Large Learning Rates Lead Us? · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › loss landscape
loss landscape geometry
0.812024
Where Do Large Learning Rates Lead Us? · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › normalization
batch normalization
0.722022
On the Periodic Behavior of Neural Network Training with Batch Normalization and Weight Decay · NeurIPS 2021
Training Scale-Invariant Neural Networks on the Sphere Can Happen in Three Regimes · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
ensemble learning
0.712023
To Stay or Not to Stay in the Pre-train Basin: Insights on Ensembling in Transfer Learning · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning › neural network ensemble
snapshot ensembles
0.712023
To Stay or Not to Stay in the Pre-train Basin: Insights on Ensembling in Transfer Learning · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization › norm-based regularization
weight decay
0.512021
On the Periodic Behavior of Neural Network Training with Batch Normalization and Weight Decay · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning
deep ensembles
0.412020
On Power Laws in Deep Ensembles · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
model ensemble
0.412020
On Power Laws in Deep Ensembles · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › sparsity
structured sparsity
0.412020
Structured Sparsification of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks · AAAI 2020
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation
0.412020
On Power Laws in Deep Ensembles · NeurIPS 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language model analysis
language model scaling
0.312025
Training Dynamics Underlying Language Model Scaling Laws: Loss Deceleration and Zero-Sum Learning · ACL (1) 2025
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › image segmentation
color segmentation
0.212015
Joint Optimization of Segmentation and Color Clustering · ICCV 2015
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
image segmentation
0.212015
Joint Optimization of Segmentation and Color Clustering · ICCV 2015
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model merging
model soup
0.212023
To Stay or Not to Stay in the Pre-train Basin: Insights on Ensembling in Transfer Learning · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
normalization
0.212022
Training Scale-Invariant Neural Networks on the Sphere Can Happen in Three Regimes · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network
0.112020
Structured Sparsification of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks · AAAI 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

weight averaging · 0.8fine-tuning · 0.8empirical study · 0.8snapshot ensembles · 0.7loss landscape exploration · 0.7StarSSE · 0.7spherical optimization · 0.6loss landscape analysis · 0.6fixed effective learning rate · 0.6periodic behavior analysis · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Training Dynamics Underlying Language Model Scaling Laws: Loss Deceleration and Zero-Sum Learning
abstract
Andrei Mircea, Supriyo Chakraborty, Nima Chitsazan, Irina Rish, Ekaterina Lobacheva. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025.
Andrei Mircea, Supriyo Chakraborty, Nima Chitsazan, Irina Rish, Ekaterina Lobacheva
ACL (1)5
2024 Where Do Large Learning Rates Lead Us?
abstract
It is generally accepted that starting neural networks training with large learning rates (LRs) improves generalization. Following a line of research devoted to understanding this effect, we conduct an empirical study in a controlled setting focusing on two questions: 1) how large an initial LR is required for obtaining optimal quality, and 2) what are the key differences between models trained with different LRs? We discover that only a narrow range of initial LRs slightly above the convergence threshold lead to optimal results after fine-tuning with a small LR or weight averaging. By studying the local geometry of reached minima, we observe that using LRs from this optimal range allows for the optimization to locate a basin that only contains high-quality minima. Additionally, we show that these initial LRs result in a sparse set of learned features, with a clear focus on those most relevant for the task. In contrast, starting training with too small LRs leads to unstable minima and attempts to learn all features simultaneously, resulting in poor generalization. Conversely, using initial LRs that are too large fails to detect a basin with good solutions and extract meaningful patterns from the data.
Ildus Sadrtdinov, Maxim Kodryan, Eduard Pokonechny, Ekaterina Lobacheva, Dmitry P. Vetrov
NeurIPS4
2023 To Stay or Not to Stay in the Pre-train Basin: Insights on Ensembling in Transfer Learning
abstract
Transfer learning and ensembling are two popular techniques for improving the performance and robustness of neural networks. Due to the high cost of pre-training, ensembles of models fine-tuned from a single pre-trained checkpoint are often used in practice. Such models end up in the same basin of the loss landscape, which we call the pre-train basin, and thus have limited diversity. In this work, we show that ensembles trained from a single pre-trained checkpoint may be improved by better exploring the pre-train basin, however, leaving the basin results in losing the benefits of transfer learning and in degradation of the ensemble quality. Based on the analysis of existing exploration methods, we propose a more effective modification of the Snapshot Ensembles (SSE) for transfer learning setup, StarSSE, which results in stronger ensembles and uniform model soups.
Ildus Sadrtdinov, Dmitrii Pozdeev, Dmitry P. Vetrov, Ekaterina Lobacheva
NeurIPS4
2022 Training Scale-Invariant Neural Networks on the Sphere Can Happen in Three Regimes
abstract
A fundamental property of deep learning normalization techniques, such as batch normalization, is making the pre-normalization parameters scale invariant. The intrinsic domain of such parameters is the unit sphere, and therefore their gradient optimization dynamics can be represented via spherical optimization with varying effective learning rate (ELR), which was studied previously. However, the varying ELR may obscure certain characteristics of the intrinsic loss landscape structure. In this work, we investigate the properties of training scale-invariant neural networks directly on the sphere using a fixed ELR. We discover three regimes of such training depending on the ELR value: convergence, chaotic equilibrium, and divergence. We study these regimes in detail both on a theoretical examination of a toy example and on a thorough empirical analysis of real scale-invariant deep learning models. Each regime has unique features and reflects specific properties of the intrinsic loss landscape, some of which have strong parallels with previous research on both regular and scale-invariant neural networks training. Finally, we demonstrate how the discovered regimes are reflected in conventional training of normalized networks and how they can be leveraged to achieve better optima.
Maxim Kodryan, Ekaterina Lobacheva, Maksim Nakhodnov, Dmitry P. Vetrov
NeurIPS2
2021 On the Periodic Behavior of Neural Network Training with Batch Normalization and Weight Decay
abstract
Training neural networks with batch normalization and weight decay has become a common practice in recent years. In this work, we show that their combined use may result in a surprising periodic behavior of optimization dynamics: the training process regularly exhibits destabilizations that, however, do not lead to complete divergence but cause a new period of training. We rigorously investigate the mechanism underlying the discovered periodic behavior from both empirical and theoretical points of view and analyze the conditions in which it occurs in practice. We also demonstrate that periodic behavior can be regarded as a generalization of two previously opposing perspectives on training with batch normalization and weight decay, namely the equilibrium presumption and the instability presumption.
Ekaterina Lobacheva, Maxim Kodryan, Nadezhda Chirkova, Andrey Malinin, Dmitry P. Vetrov
NeurIPS1
2020 Structured Sparsification of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks
abstract
One of the most popular approaches for neural network compression is sparsification — learning sparse weight matrices. In structured sparsification, weights are set to zero by groups corresponding to structure units, e. g. neurons. We further develop the structured sparsification approach for the gated recurrent neural networks, e. g. Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM). Specifically, in addition to the sparsification of individual weights and neurons, we propose sparsifying the preactivations of gates. This makes some gates constant and simplifies an LSTM structure. We test our approach on the text classification and language modeling tasks. Our method improves the neuron-wise compression of the model in most of the tasks. We also observe that the resulting structure of gate sparsity depends on the task and connect the learned structures to the specifics of the particular tasks.
Ekaterina Lobacheva, Nadezhda Chirkova, Alexander Markovich, Dmitry P. Vetrov
AAAI1
2020 On Power Laws in Deep Ensembles
abstract
Ensembles of deep neural networks are known to achieve state-of-the-art performance in uncertainty estimation and lead to accuracy improvement. In this work, we focus on a classification problem and investigate the behavior of both non-calibrated and calibrated negative log-likelihood (CNLL) of a deep ensemble as a function of the ensemble size and the member network size. We indicate the conditions under which CNLL follows a power law w. r. t. ensemble size or member network size, and analyze the dynamics of the parameters of the discovered power laws. Our important practical finding is that one large network may perform worse than an ensemble of several medium-size networks with the same total number of parameters (we call this ensemble a memory split). Using the detected power law-like dependencies, we can predict (1) the possible gain from the ensembling of networks with given structure, (2) the optimal memory split given a memory budget, based on a relatively small number of trained networks.
Ekaterina Lobacheva, Nadezhda Chirkova, Maxim Kodryan, Dmitry P. Vetrov
NeurIPS1
2018 Bayesian Compression for Natural Language Processing
abstract
In natural language processing, a lot of the tasks are successfully solved with recurrent neural networks, but such models have a huge number of parameters.The majority of these parameters are often concentrated in the embedding layer, which size grows proportionally to the vocabulary length.We propose a Bayesian sparsification technique for RNNs which allows compressing the RNN dozens or hundreds of times without time-consuming hyperparameters tuning.We also generalize the model for vocabulary sparsification to filter out unnecessary words and compress the RNN even further.We show that the choice of the kept words is interpretable.
Nadezhda Chirkova, Ekaterina Lobacheva, Dmitry P. Vetrov
EMNLP2
2016 Deep Part-Based Generative Shape Model with Latent Variables
Alexander Kirillov, Mikhail Gavrikov, Ekaterina Lobacheva, Anton Osokin, Dmitry P. Vetrov
BMVC3
2015 Joint Optimization of Segmentation and Color Clustering
abstract
Binary energy optimization is a popular approach for segmenting a color image into foreground/background regions. To model the appearance of the regions, color, a relatively high dimensional feature, should be handled effectively. A full color histogram is usually too sparse to be reliable. One approach is to explicitly reduce dimensionality by clustering or quantizing the color space. Another popular approach is to fit GMMs for soft implicit clustering of the color space. These approaches work well when the foreground/background are sufficiently distinct. In cases of more subtle difference in appearance, both approaches may reduce or even eliminate foreground/background distinction. This happens because either color clustering is performed completely independently from the segmentation process, as a preprocessing step (in clustering), or independently for the foreground and independently for the background (in GMM). We propose to make clustering an integral part of segmentation, by including a new clustering term in the energy function. Our energy function with a clustering term favours clusterings that make foreground/background appearance more distinct. Thus our energy function jointly optimizes over color clustering, foreground/background models, and segmentation. Exact optimization is not feasible, therefore we develop an approximate algorithm. We show the advantage of including the color clustering term into the energy function on camouflage images, as well as standard segmentation datasets.
Ekaterina Lobacheva, Olga Veksler, Yuri Boykov
ICCV1