EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ekaterina Lobacheva
dblp:176/1464
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
4as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-1538-1286ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 4 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
9 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 38% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 18% Efficient and distributed learning · 12% |
Topics — the 20 heaviest of 24, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training dynamics |
1.4 | 2 | 2025 | Training Dynamics Underlying Language Model Scaling Laws: Loss Deceleration and Zero-Sum Learning · ACL (1) 2025 Training Scale-Invariant Neural Networks on the Sphere Can Happen in Three Regimes · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
fine-tuning |
0.9 | 2 | 2024 | To Stay or Not to Stay in the Pre-train Basin: Insights on Ensembling in Transfer Learning · NeurIPS 2023 Where Do Large Learning Rates Lead Us? · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
scaling laws |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Training Dynamics Underlying Language Model Scaling Laws: Loss Deceleration and Zero-Sum Learning · ACL (1) 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | Structured Sparsification of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks · AAAI 2020 Bayesian Compression for Natural Language Processing · EMNLP 2018 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
learning rate schedule |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Where Do Large Learning Rates Lead Us? · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › loss landscape
loss landscape geometry |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Where Do Large Learning Rates Lead Us? · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › normalization
batch normalization |
0.7 | 2 | 2022 | On the Periodic Behavior of Neural Network Training with Batch Normalization and Weight Decay · NeurIPS 2021 Training Scale-Invariant Neural Networks on the Sphere Can Happen in Three Regimes · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
ensemble learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | To Stay or Not to Stay in the Pre-train Basin: Insights on Ensembling in Transfer Learning · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning › neural network ensemble
snapshot ensembles |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | To Stay or Not to Stay in the Pre-train Basin: Insights on Ensembling in Transfer Learning · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization › norm-based regularization
weight decay |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | On the Periodic Behavior of Neural Network Training with Batch Normalization and Weight Decay · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning
deep ensembles |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | On Power Laws in Deep Ensembles · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
model ensemble |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | On Power Laws in Deep Ensembles · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › sparsity
structured sparsity |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Structured Sparsification of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks · AAAI 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | On Power Laws in Deep Ensembles · NeurIPS 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language model analysis
language model scaling |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Training Dynamics Underlying Language Model Scaling Laws: Loss Deceleration and Zero-Sum Learning · ACL (1) 2025 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › image segmentation
color segmentation |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Joint Optimization of Segmentation and Color Clustering · ICCV 2015 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
image segmentation |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Joint Optimization of Segmentation and Color Clustering · ICCV 2015 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model merging
model soup |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | To Stay or Not to Stay in the Pre-train Basin: Insights on Ensembling in Transfer Learning · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
normalization |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Training Scale-Invariant Neural Networks on the Sphere Can Happen in Three Regimes · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Structured Sparsification of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks · AAAI 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
weight averaging · 0.8fine-tuning · 0.8empirical study · 0.8snapshot ensembles · 0.7loss landscape exploration · 0.7StarSSE · 0.7spherical optimization · 0.6loss landscape analysis · 0.6fixed effective learning rate · 0.6periodic behavior analysis · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Training Dynamics Underlying Language Model Scaling Laws: Loss Deceleration and Zero-Sum LearningabstractAndrei Mircea, Supriyo Chakraborty, Nima Chitsazan, Irina Rish, Ekaterina Lobacheva. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Andrei Mircea, Supriyo Chakraborty, Nima Chitsazan, Irina Rish, Ekaterina Lobacheva |
ACL (1) | 5 |
| 2024 | Where Do Large Learning Rates Lead Us?abstractIt is generally accepted that starting neural networks training with large learning rates (LRs) improves generalization. Following a line of research devoted to understanding this effect, we conduct an empirical study in a controlled setting focusing on two questions: 1) how large an initial LR is required for obtaining optimal quality, and 2) what are the key differences between models trained with different LRs? We discover that only a narrow range of initial LRs slightly above the convergence threshold lead to optimal results after fine-tuning with a small LR or weight averaging. By studying the local geometry of reached minima, we observe that using LRs from this optimal range allows for the optimization to locate a basin that only contains high-quality minima. Additionally, we show that these initial LRs result in a sparse set of learned features, with a clear focus on those most relevant for the task. In contrast, starting training with too small LRs leads to unstable minima and attempts to learn all features simultaneously, resulting in poor generalization. Conversely, using initial LRs that are too large fails to detect a basin with good solutions and extract meaningful patterns from the data. Ildus Sadrtdinov, Maxim Kodryan, Eduard Pokonechny, Ekaterina Lobacheva, Dmitry P. Vetrov |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2023 | To Stay or Not to Stay in the Pre-train Basin: Insights on Ensembling in Transfer LearningabstractTransfer learning and ensembling are two popular techniques for improving the performance and robustness of neural networks.
Due to the high cost of pre-training, ensembles of models fine-tuned from a single pre-trained checkpoint are often used in practice.
Such models end up in the same basin of the loss landscape, which we call the pre-train basin, and thus have limited diversity.
In this work, we show that ensembles trained from a single pre-trained checkpoint may be improved by better exploring the pre-train basin, however, leaving the basin results in losing the benefits of transfer learning and in degradation of the ensemble quality.
Based on the analysis of existing exploration methods, we propose a more effective modification of the Snapshot Ensembles (SSE) for transfer learning setup, StarSSE, which results in stronger ensembles and uniform model soups. Ildus Sadrtdinov, Dmitrii Pozdeev, Dmitry P. Vetrov, Ekaterina Lobacheva |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2022 | Training Scale-Invariant Neural Networks on the Sphere Can Happen in Three RegimesabstractA fundamental property of deep learning normalization techniques, such as batch normalization, is making the pre-normalization parameters scale invariant. The intrinsic domain of such parameters is the unit sphere, and therefore their gradient optimization dynamics can be represented via spherical optimization with varying effective learning rate (ELR), which was studied previously. However, the varying ELR may obscure certain characteristics of the intrinsic loss landscape structure. In this work, we investigate the properties of training scale-invariant neural networks directly on the sphere using a fixed ELR. We discover three regimes of such training depending on the ELR value: convergence, chaotic equilibrium, and divergence. We study these regimes in detail both on a theoretical examination of a toy example and on a thorough empirical analysis of real scale-invariant deep learning models. Each regime has unique features and reflects specific properties of the intrinsic loss landscape, some of which have strong parallels with previous research on both regular and scale-invariant neural networks training. Finally, we demonstrate how the discovered regimes are reflected in conventional training of normalized networks and how they can be leveraged to achieve better optima. Maxim Kodryan, Ekaterina Lobacheva, Maksim Nakhodnov, Dmitry P. Vetrov |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2021 | On the Periodic Behavior of Neural Network Training with Batch Normalization and Weight DecayabstractTraining neural networks with batch normalization and weight decay has become a common practice in recent years. In this work, we show that their combined use may result in a surprising periodic behavior of optimization dynamics: the training process regularly exhibits destabilizations that, however, do not lead to complete divergence but cause a new period of training. We rigorously investigate the mechanism underlying the discovered periodic behavior from both empirical and theoretical points of view and analyze the conditions in which it occurs in practice. We also demonstrate that periodic behavior can be regarded as a generalization of two previously opposing perspectives on training with batch normalization and weight decay, namely the equilibrium presumption and the instability presumption. Ekaterina Lobacheva, Maxim Kodryan, Nadezhda Chirkova, Andrey Malinin, Dmitry P. Vetrov |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2020 | Structured Sparsification of Gated Recurrent Neural NetworksabstractOne of the most popular approaches for neural network compression is sparsification — learning sparse weight matrices. In structured sparsification, weights are set to zero by groups corresponding to structure units, e. g. neurons. We further develop the structured sparsification approach for the gated recurrent neural networks, e. g. Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM). Specifically, in addition to the sparsification of individual weights and neurons, we propose sparsifying the preactivations of gates. This makes some gates constant and simplifies an LSTM structure. We test our approach on the text classification and language modeling tasks. Our method improves the neuron-wise compression of the model in most of the tasks. We also observe that the resulting structure of gate sparsity depends on the task and connect the learned structures to the specifics of the particular tasks. Ekaterina Lobacheva, Nadezhda Chirkova, Alexander Markovich, Dmitry P. Vetrov |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2020 | On Power Laws in Deep EnsemblesabstractEnsembles of deep neural networks are known to achieve state-of-the-art performance in uncertainty estimation and lead to accuracy improvement. In this work, we focus on a classification problem and investigate the behavior of both non-calibrated and calibrated negative log-likelihood (CNLL) of a deep ensemble as a function of the ensemble size and the member network size. We indicate the conditions under which CNLL follows a power law w. r. t. ensemble size or member network size, and analyze the dynamics of the parameters of the discovered power laws. Our important practical finding is that one large network may perform worse than an ensemble of several medium-size networks with the same total number of parameters (we call this ensemble a memory split). Using the detected power law-like dependencies, we can predict (1) the possible gain from the ensembling of networks with given structure, (2) the optimal memory split given a memory budget, based on a relatively small number of trained networks. Ekaterina Lobacheva, Nadezhda Chirkova, Maxim Kodryan, Dmitry P. Vetrov |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2018 | Bayesian Compression for Natural Language ProcessingabstractIn natural language processing, a lot of the tasks are successfully solved with recurrent neural networks, but such models have a huge number of parameters.The majority of these parameters are often concentrated in the embedding layer, which size grows proportionally to the vocabulary length.We propose a Bayesian sparsification technique for RNNs which allows compressing the RNN dozens or hundreds of times without time-consuming hyperparameters tuning.We also generalize the model for vocabulary sparsification to filter out unnecessary words and compress the RNN even further.We show that the choice of the kept words is interpretable. Nadezhda Chirkova, Ekaterina Lobacheva, Dmitry P. Vetrov |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2016 | Deep Part-Based Generative Shape Model with Latent Variables
Alexander Kirillov, Mikhail Gavrikov, Ekaterina Lobacheva, Anton Osokin, Dmitry P. Vetrov |
BMVC | 3 |
| 2015 | Joint Optimization of Segmentation and Color ClusteringabstractBinary energy optimization is a popular approach for segmenting a color image into foreground/background regions. To model the appearance of the regions, color, a relatively high dimensional feature, should be handled effectively. A full color histogram is usually too sparse to be reliable. One approach is to explicitly reduce dimensionality by clustering or quantizing the color space. Another popular approach is to fit GMMs for soft implicit clustering of the color space. These approaches work well when the foreground/background are sufficiently distinct. In cases of more subtle difference in appearance, both approaches may reduce or even eliminate foreground/background distinction. This happens because either color clustering is performed completely independently from the segmentation process, as a preprocessing step (in clustering), or independently for the foreground and independently for the background (in GMM). We propose to make clustering an integral part of segmentation, by including a new clustering term in the energy function. Our energy function with a clustering term favours clusterings that make foreground/background appearance more distinct. Thus our energy function jointly optimizes over color clustering, foreground/background models, and segmentation. Exact optimization is not feasible, therefore we develop an approximate algorithm. We show the advantage of including the color clustering term into the energy function on camouflage images, as well as standard segmentation datasets. Ekaterina Lobacheva, Olga Veksler, Yuri Boykov |
ICCV | 1 |